Review
I got 2 links from the handwritten PBN in exchange for my honest review
Seller contact, TAT & report
- I've placed the order easily on Wednesday and got the report yesterday, 2 working days +- TAT, no delays
- The report contains each of the dates of published articles, PBN domains, Link URL, TF/DA/RD, age of the PBN domain, Anchor text used and the targeted URL of each link
- The metrics are as the following
TF | DA | RD | AGE |
14 | 27 | 69 | 6 years, 4 months |
24 | 26 | 84 | 3 years, 4 months |
Articles Content
- The articles contain 351 & 387 words
- The content is decent, there are some grammatical mistakes, but it's readable, unique and looks handwritten
- The articles contain 1-2 relevant images
- The link placements were good to go, could be better, but still contextual
Websites Structure & Design
- The websites look natural, just like real websites
- Both the websites have a different theme & logo
- Both of the websites have the same categories, sidebar as well as the widgets & menus,
I believe this is something that should be changed for a better diversity
- One of the websites has www in the URL, while the other does not, but both are HTTP
- Both of the websites contain a fake ad in the sidebar
- Both of the websites have a different font & text size
Domains Links
- Each of the websites have a couple of links from Wikipedia
- Each of the websites has some natural old links from authority websites
- Both of the websites have links from Blogspot, looks a little bit weird, but good to go
What can I suggest
- Add favicons
- Add an SSL, HTTPs website is a must nowadays, not all of the websites but at least the majority
- Change the websites structure, categories names for a better diversity
Overall, I can say that these PBNs are decent but could be really improved with some work
UO40
