Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
TO ANYONE ASKING FOR REVIEW COPIES: It's spammy, please do not post in this thread asking for review copies, your post will be reported as spam. Please STOP!


Do you have any sample for gaming/crypto niche?
No sorry.

Is this a monthly payment or a one-time payment for the link?
Pay as you go. No membership or recurring fees.
 
this sounds promising, do you offer SEO service? I need to use SEO on my blog to get more activity there
 
Hey all,

Super excited to share some news - the new and improved Buyselltext.com is now live!

We've streamlined the bulk order process, and you can now sort, filter, and find your old articles with a whole lot less hassle. Plus, whether you're on a laptop, tablet, or phone, the new fully responsive design has got you covered.

Just a heads up - like any fresh update, there might be a few bugs and quirks lurking around. The team is on it, but do give a shout out if you spot anything funky.

But we're not done yet - we're continuously working on more updates for the site. We're also onboarding new writers each week to ensure your content is delivered faster going forward.

Cheers!
 
What is the AI score for the articles?
We do not currently rely on AI scores alone for determining potential AI use among writers (except in cases where both sectional and full content scores skew toward the same extreme) although it is one part of our defense. This is because results with originality.ai range widely depending on their detection model used, and because sectional scan scores are less accurate than full-content scores due to the shorter amount of input text used. So we use a custom (and adjusting) threshold to trigger reviews, but it is based on a combination of full and sectional scores, not a single one.

Since the scores indicate probabilities only, we use them in context with our own inhouse tools. As such I can't say 'this is our single score threshold for every article", like I can say with Copyscape results, because these scans do not work in that way - yet.
 
We do not currently rely on AI scores alone for determining potential AI use among writers (except in cases where both sectional and full content scores skew toward the same extreme) although it is one part of our defense. This is because results with originality.ai range widely depending on their detection model used, and because sectional scan scores are less accurate than full-content scores due to the shorter amount of input text used. So we use a custom (and adjusting) threshold to trigger reviews, but it is based on a combination of full and sectional scores, not a single one.

Since the scores indicate probabilities only, we use them in context with our own inhouse tools. As such I can't say 'this is our single score threshold for every article", like I can say with Copyscape results, because these scans do not work in that way - yet.
How can I rely on your in-house tool? Which obviously can't be considered a standard.
 
How can I rely on your in-house tool? Which obviously can't be considered a standard.
We use originality.ai as well, but our system doesn't trigger based on a single score (such as their overall scan score) which is also unreliable, because it provides a scale of probabilities for each content scanned, and not definitive results the way Copyscape does. We trigger reviews based on a calculated score derived from their sectional (block) scores and full scores, as well as running averages for each writer, and then supported by a review. It's not bullet-proof, but it's more reliable than the single score cut-off.

We've pushed through several thousand pieces when testing the integration, so we have a fairly good understanding of it's strengths and weaknesses. We have had content fail which was written well prior to the launch of CGPT, and inhouse for our own channels. The results vary even more widely depending on their model you're using, so a single score threshold would not be a reliable standard by which to ban or dock writers.
 
Any discounts?

We currently offer the following bulk deposit bonuses outlined below:

$1,000+ - 3% bonus
$2,500+ - 6% bonus

So a $3000 deposit, as an example, will add $3,180 in funds to your account.

These are deposit bonuses - not order discounts. So you would get the bonus when adding funds at or above the amounts mentioned above.
 
We got some open slots for content writing right now. Pumping out top-notch articles, blog posts, product descriptions – you name it. Got the time to deliver quick! Shoot me a DM if you need a quote or had any questions.
 
I ordered an article via the dashboard 3 days ago. So far nothing... What's the normal ETA on article writings?

Also, your entire website (BuySellText.com) has been down for the past 24-48 hours. What's up?
 
Dear clients,

I regret to inform you that our website is currently down due to what appears to be a fire related incident affecting the NY servers of our hosting provider (Kamatera). We have been in contact with them and they expect the servers to be back online today. The length of this outage has been unacceptable, and unfortunately it was initially not communicate that it would take this long to resolve - the initial suggestion was that it would be resolved by mid-day yesterday, however the Fire Marshall required additional checks to be done this morning at 9 AM EST. We've never had an issue with this host in the past, but the way this incident has been handled will make us look elsewhere once we're back online.

I apologize about the situation. It has been incredibly frustrating for both myself, clients and writers who depend on us for their livelihood.

For a single article the ETA is typically 48-72 hours, however that is currently delayed as the backend where our writers view and complete assignments is also down. We'll be putting in overtime as soon as we're back later today.

Once again, I apologize for the current situation. I'll drop a message here as soon as we're back online or have further updates to share.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top