discoveryhomes
Newbie
- Apr 4, 2023
- 17
- 5
What do you prefer? Do-Follow links or No-Follow links?
Do-Follow links or No-Follow links
- Thread starter discoveryhomes
- Start date
- Sep 7, 2017
- 7,187
- 6,435
What kind of question is this?
It's ******** everyday. No-follow links can't rank your website, don't spend money on them.
- Feb 9, 2023
- 2,223
- 1,566
Do-Follow
- Apr 25, 2014
- 6,918
- 12,420
Everyone prefers DF links. However, you need a healthy mixture of DF & NF.
The idea for your backlink profile is to look organic.
The idea for your backlink profile is to look organic.
- Apr 27, 2017
- 4,308
- 791
I prefer both. however it depends on your objective in long run.
- Feb 27, 2016
- 3,689
- 464
Having a natural mix of both do-follow and no-follow links can make your link profile look more organic and trustworthy to Google. Therefore, I prefer to have both types of links for my website, as long as they are relevant, high-quality, and from reputable sources.
Mix of both is required. More importance should be given to do follow links.
White Label SEO
Supreme Member
- Apr 27, 2013
- 1,262
- 123
Do-follow links are generally considered better than No-follow links in terms of SEO.
But if you create only do follow links, it will be treated as spam.
White Label SEO
Supreme Member
- Apr 27, 2013
- 1,262
- 123
You are right, we should use both links, but out of do-follow and no-follow only do-follow links are considered better.
- Apr 27, 2016
- 6,358
- 2,519
Both are equally important for ranking. 60-40 is a good ratio.
sohaib34
Newbie
- May 20, 2023
- 3
- 8
DoF is best
Asuna Yuuki
Registered Member
- May 20, 2023
- 53
- 90
This is not true at all. What if a nofol.low link brings you a huge (with huge i mean huge huge) amount of traffic than a corresponding dofol.low link without traffic?
60/40 is indeed very good
sam55
Power Member
- Dec 5, 2013
- 578
- 892
A link is a link.
It's DO-FOLLOW by default and that's how the web should work.
That's why there is no "do-follow" tag. Nofollow is some bullshit introduced by Google and its thugs like Matt Cutts.
Just think about it, when you're worrying about such things, you're actually worrying about pleasing a fucking bot. Your goal shouldn't be making a bot happy. Make your users happy and they will reward you.
The web is made for people, not for Google bots to police whether you're adding a stupid tag on your OWN property or not.
We gave the fuckers too much power by acting religiously on their every single wish.
It's DO-FOLLOW by default and that's how the web should work.
That's why there is no "do-follow" tag. Nofollow is some bullshit introduced by Google and its thugs like Matt Cutts.
Just think about it, when you're worrying about such things, you're actually worrying about pleasing a fucking bot. Your goal shouldn't be making a bot happy. Make your users happy and they will reward you.
The web is made for people, not for Google bots to police whether you're adding a stupid tag on your OWN property or not.
We gave the fuckers too much power by acting religiously on their every single wish.
Asuna Yuuki
Registered Member
- May 20, 2023
- 53
- 90
"do-follow" is by default wrong it should be "follow" but that's another thing.
For me it makes perfekt sense. It is a ranking factor like the old pagerank or other things they implemented.
I mean they have to controll Google through some algorithms or it would be a complete mess.
sam55
Power Member
- Dec 5, 2013
- 578
- 892
It should be nothing like the original.
The only rel tags there should be noreferrer and noopener.
Google manipulated webmasters for too long.
Yeah they have to "control" their search engine but not by telling us to add invisible tags that mean nothing to the average user.
"It would be a complete mess" what would be a complete mess?
The search results?? That's not my problem or your problem. It's google's problem. Have them fix that by their own.
Asuna Yuuki
Registered Member
- May 20, 2023
- 53
- 90
Oh boy... Did you had a bad day or something? I don't think there's anything I or anyone else can do to discuss with you in a normal tone.
Or maybe it's your normal tone, but I can't handle it.