Looking for organic traffic service
- Thread starter tiannvu
- Start date
- Sep 30, 2022
- 821
- 106
Many Good service providers available here : https://www.blackhatworld.com/forums/seo-link-building.43/
Oh this service have can trackable in gg search console right
Could u recommend some partner can provide it?
IPTS to receive "organic" traffic from... bots?!? For the life of me, I just don't get the point. It must prove helpful under certain circumstances, though, since you're recommending it, but HOW??
- Jan 17, 2015
- 5,263
- 4,956
There are other more expensive options for sure. There was a very interesting topic talking about these options I recommend you to check
Thank you @SirLouen ! The thread is very instructive, indeed, but does not aswer my question, which is: why would automated, fake views have any impact on Google rankings? I've tried human CTR manipulation, and it works, although certainly not so well as 5 years ago (and it's goddamn expensive). Humans do make a real search on the real Google to really land on your page and then behave like humans, scrolling, rclicking, reading. That's why Google takes it into account. But I don't think fake traffic will be taken into account. Plus it's useless in terms of conversion. The only thing I see which can happen when using it is a penalty. I thought, perhaps it can boost a product on Amazon, but I'm not even sure. Or some crooks may use it to artificially boost the metrics of a website they want to sell. But from an owner's POV, I don't know what to do with it. What is your personal experience with it? How/Why do you use it?
- Jan 17, 2015
- 5,263
- 4,956
In that post you can see both automated and human tested. Some work others not so good. I think it's not about the fact that it's automated or manually done, but that the traffic that is being injected looks natural or doesn't. So basically for each single visit, if you are leaving a footprint for future checks then it will be easily tagged and dimissed. This is why most of the automated software try to offer some randomization options on their simulations. But if you don't set them appropiately they won't go through. This is by far the most difficult thing of automating almost anything for marketing purposes.
You could even have manual views hindered. For example this happens a lot in YT. Microworkers views that are removed after a while. Basically because another issue with microworkers, is that they use the exact same browser data, to do zillion of repetitions everyday, which tag their behaviour similarly to other automation systems.
Also another problem with automation is the IP (this is where rotating proxies with millions of IP appear to the rescue). I don't think anyone can answer with precision why or why not an automated or manual system will impact with 100% reliability. There are many aspects that are permanently changing (ie CTRBooster may have worked like 6 months ago, but nowadays I don't see it as the best option)