Originality AI it's not as Originality as they think

SirLouen

Elite Member
Executive VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
5,263
Reaction score
4,955
Yesterday I checked a text.

The result:

1681120517392.png

I thought: Ok, pretty good overall, it can feel a little bit AI but it's probably human writen

This morning I retest the EXACT same text and....

1681120577353.png

Let's go! These are the results of the supposedly most recommended tool out there. Every man for himself!

giphy.gif
 
Dude I ran content I wrote 5 years ago when nobody knew what AI is. These crappy detectors marked it all as AI written lol, bullshit.
You write like a bot o_O

What % of AI did it throw to you for such texts?
 
Heh, maybe it's preditcting what will happen in the future. You typed in the text so since then it belongs to AI, therefore AI will use it in it's answers thanks to constantly learning alghoritms, therefore it's AI generated. Right? ;). This checkers are VERY innacurate, some AI generated SQL code i checked it said it's 100% non AI and sometimes my own code it said it is 100% AI( and you can easily *trick* these type of checkers by putting comments in your code).
 
Heh, maybe it's preditcting what will happen in the future. You typed in the text so since then it belongs to AI, therefore AI will use it in it's answers thanks to constantly learning alghoritms, therefore it's AI generated. Right? ;). This checkers are VERY innacurate, some AI generated SQL code i checked it said it's 100% non AI and sometimes my own code it said it is 100% AI( and you can easily *trick* these type of checkers by putting comments in your code).
I've also tested today a text I put in originality like 4 days ago and ranked 40% AI, and today it has ranked 10% AI which invalidates that theory.
 
Also its asking for money, who is paying them for app that don't work.
 
maybe you are NPC and you dont know it.
The big bang AI theory says eveybody will become and NPC that will be replaceable by AI, therefore we are all NPC's. Everything you say will be generated against you in the future.
 
Haven't found a single tool that can accurately predict AI text. I can read something and have a pretty good hunch if the writer used AI for it. The writing is pretty garbage and uninspiring. But if you run it through multiple detectors, they should flag a portion of it at least. ChatGPt content always has 100% or higher levels on most tools. They are still not as useful, I really hope someone builds one that can really predict with high accuracy.
 
Just ran AI content through it and got back 100% Ai. Ran real content through it… 100% Ai. It would seemed they just tweaked it where anything borderline is now considered AI with their new update. But if a “detector” says Ai and real content is 100% so then it doesn’t really do anyone any good.
 
You write like a bot o_O

What % of AI did it throw to you for such texts?
I no longer use AI detectors. Honestly, I am relieved. It was an extra unecessary step which left me wondering WTF. I was testing chapGPT for spelling and grammar. This may have been my mistake? I copied and pasted my text into chatGPT. I am assume this is why my scan was marked 100% AI. A joke, as text was written by me and the content is totally orginal and based on my life experiences.

I loved the example I saw here were someone quoted the Bible, and orginality ai scanned it as 100% AI.

Thanks to all of you, BlackHatWorld and the Computer Chaos Club are my go to sources when I want real insights into services offered.

Thank you!
 
Yesterday I checked a text.

The result:

View attachment 250132

I thought: Ok, pretty good overall, it can feel a little bit AI but it's probably human writen

This morning I retest the EXACT same text and....

View attachment 250133

Let's go! These are the results of the supposedly most recommended tool out there. Every man for himself!

giphy.gif
A.I. detection is a scam known to many. Perhaps you haven't read the forum enough but there are plenty of people who view it as a scam here.
 
A.I. detection is a scam known to many. Perhaps you haven't read the forum enough but there are plenty of people who view it as a scam here.
I did not fall for it, but after reading Forbes magazine review, I was interested. Should've known better. Glad I joined here. I was using chatGPT 3.5, now 4,0 and Bard, I haven't used Gemini that often, but I checked it out in more depth today. Better than Bard.

I worked for a company who outsourced training AI's. It was interesting even when pay wasn't that great.

The best job was outsource training for G..... I signed all kinds of privacy documents, had to send copy of passport before beginning training. Spent weeks learning how to rate pages. That was very interesting! I hung in all those weeks for the training, not for the money.

The posts I read here are great! I thank all of you for shedding the light right through the scams!
 
Back
Top