chatgpt becoming useless

That’s not the point here. But if you insist, in terms of garbage, it was “ garbage in, quality out” at the start and now it is “<anything in>, garbage out”. Even instructing it specifically what needs to be done where in the code doesn’t help. It just continues to pretend like everything is fine. This may not be noticeable much in simple coding tasks though
Really? Maybe from your end mate. If you knew the number of complex tools and products I've been able to come up with past couple of days, bet u wouldn't say that. Obviously won't go much into details. Again... suit yourself. I'm not the kind of guy you can dare me trivially and expect me to shit out gold for u lol. Do yr homework
 
I have created 2 phython script doing wonderful automation jobs purely via ChatGPT, make sure you divide the chats in different code and always use same chat so model can learn the process, it also depends on the way you word the prompt.

Currently I have created a script that (one one click), converts Google trends, into youtube shorts. It's amazing.
 
With Chatgpt, the prompts you use is a big factor to the results you get
Exactly what I've been trying to say. There's a reason why it's called "prompt engineering" and why it's becoming a whole subject on it's own. Anyone remember "fravier's search lors" back in the days? That's the kind of place I'm coming from and a whole lot more.
 
Exactly what I've been trying to say. There's a reason why it's called "prompt engineering" and why it's becoming a whole subject on it's own. Anyone remember "fravier's search lors" back in the days? That's the kind of place I'm coming from and a whole lot more.
true, in fact, i realised that if you keep on using one chat window on single subject, results improve drastically.

Now I am working on a simple phython script that will scrap shopify product images, save them and then store shopify product description, convert it into subtitles and then using TTS, convert to audio, and finally using product images + subtitles + TTS, resize the video to 9/16 and create youtube short.

Problem generally comes from updated API's by services like Shopify or Amazon, as chatGPT data is till 2021. So it still takes time however once
hit the right code, output is beautiful.
 
I have told you, guys, before
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/chatgpt-wont-go-anywhere.1475367/
Where those people who told me that I am wrong

You're very wrong.

In fact your understanding of how machine learning models work is completely wrong.

They aren't mathematical algorithms that tell it how to respond to certain words. Not even close.

The reason chatgpt isn't great at coding right now is because it isn't trained to be.

Just wait until the results of openai hiring 1000 programmers to instruct-train it to solve programming problems..

You can't say that chatgpt will never replace programmers, then because it hasn't in 6 weeks, it never will.

That's like those guys who used to laugh at the internet and say it's a fad ;-)
 
I used to be amazed by coding with Chatgpt. But recently its responses are becoming generic, dumb, false and literally wasting my time...

It gives me simply non-working code.

At this point its faster to use google again...

:(
just a suggestion, but how about..just an idea.. how about actually learning to code instead of using AI and google ? ;)
you know how people coded programs before chatGPT and stackoverflow? they read books and RFCs and yea sure asked other programmers for help once in a while on IRC, but generally figured things out themselfs. this dumbing down of coding in recent years is really annoying. coding used to be an art, now its all made easy with frameworks and stuff so nobody really has to understand or think for themselfs.
sorry needed this little rant :D

python-meme.png
 
Although.. It might be becoming useless on second thought.

Remember that thing called the Internet that we all gave up on around the year 2000 because of information overload and high access charges? https://i.redd.it/7tjxc536x7k71.png
 
just a suggestion, but how about..just an idea.. how about actually learning to code instead of using AI and google ? ;)
you know how people coded programs before chatGPT and stackoverflow? they read books and RFCs and yea sure asked other programmers for help once in a while on IRC, but generally figured things out themselfs. this dumbing down of coding in recent years is really annoying. coding used to be an art, now its all made easy with frameworks and stuff so nobody really has to understand or think for themselfs.
sorry needed this little rant :D

View attachment 248895
I expected you to say this. I remember you said the same about hobby and professional programmers. Now we have also chat gpt programmers. That code sucks if it's not handled properly. Same as with junior code - if someone doesn't refactor it, it will suck big time. I would highly recommend to learn coding the old way - code quality and handling of different scenarios is much better this way.
 
You're very wrong.

In fact your understanding of how machine learning models work is completely wrong.

They aren't mathematical algorithms that tell it how to respond to certain words. Not even close.

The reason chatgpt isn't great at coding right now is because it isn't trained to be.

Just wait until the results of openai hiring 1000 programmers to instruct-train it to solve programming problems..

You can't say that chatgpt will never replace programmers, then because it hasn't in 6 weeks, it never will.

That's like those guys who used to laugh at the internet and say it's a fad ;-)
here you go man
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-03-31 075432.png
    Screenshot 2023-03-31 075432.png
    69.3 KB · Views: 26
  • Screenshot 2023-03-31 075453.png
    Screenshot 2023-03-31 075453.png
    65.4 KB · Views: 26
I think its just you have become a brilliant programmer, and chatgp no long has as many parameters as your brain! lol
 
You're very wrong.

In fact your understanding of how machine learning models work is completely wrong.

They aren't mathematical algorithms that tell it how to respond to certain words. Not even close.

The reason chatgpt isn't great at coding right now is because it isn't trained to be.

Just wait until the results of openai hiring 1000 programmers to instruct-train it to solve programming problems..

You can't say that chatgpt will never replace programmers, then because it hasn't in 6 weeks, it never will.

That's like those guys who used to laugh at the internet and say it's a fad ;-)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nd...affers-all-techies-fired-report-3902373/amp/1
The spokesperson added that the company's focus is to ensure that GitHub is a fully-integrated platform powered by artificial intelligence (AI) for developers and customers.
 
here you go man

I completely agree with @courses_retailer

BTW I am deep learning engineer

and I can guarantee that every AI bot depends on mathematical algos

Still both wrong. :)

Machine learning models are not a mathematical algorithm.

It's not correct to say that the model its self is a mathematical algorithm.

BUILDING the model, ie, training it uses mathematical algorithms to minimize the loss function by gradient descent, which is done using calculus. Specifically partial derivatives and the chain rule.

It's akin to saying that a car engine uses a wrench to get from A to B. It doesn't.

A wrench was used to tune the engine. Once the engine is tuned and ready, it doesn't use the spanner.

Likewise, a machine learning model does not use any mathematical algorithms AT ALL once. You BUILD the machine learning model with algorithms.

This is the fundamental difference between machine learning models and traditional programs.

Traditional programs use algorithms and conditional statements to perform a task. A machine learning model does not. There's not a single algorithm you can find in a neural network.

A machine learning model will produce totally different outputs for the same input each time you run it. (Providing of course the hyperparameter temperature is high enough). But a machine learning model returns multiple options at each step and chooses one to use. This is also what the decoder hyperparameters top-k and top-p are for. To tweak what tokens are chosen. top-p is tokens who have a probability above the top-p and top-k is the top k tokens.

This isn't possible with an algorithm. An algorithm will produce 1, and only 1 answer for every input, every time.

It's really not correct to describe a model as an algorithm, let alone "just an algorithm".

The term 'algorithm' is heavily used, but it's often incorrectly used or misunderstood.

At the most fundamental level an algorithm is a set of rules that are followed.

You could in a way say that a transformer is a "set of rules", and it is.

But within that set of rules is a black box that NO ONE understands.

No one knows why machine learning models are doing what they're doing.

machine learning is mostly experimental science. So reducing it to an 'algorithm' is highly misleading.

The problem is when one is talking about 'deep learning algorithms' what's being referred to are the algorithms for training and the algorithms for deploying the transformer its self.

Take a look at https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1506/1506.01195.pdf

Look at how they use the term 'algorithm'

"CNN algorithm has two main processes: convolution and sampling ."

The 'algorithmic' components are the outer processes. It's not the part within the neural network its self after it's trained.

https://share.getcloudapp.com/OAuond7W
Normally you don't have to make this subtle distinction, but when someone's trying to reduce the power of what a deep neural network is.

13ce4eaa-4249-4fc3-a06d-da1fcbead660.jpeg


again here

e02ae49e-b66a-4d5d-b0f9-44cda58d6342.jpeg


The 'algorithms' are the processes of that particular model and the training. It's not the actual brain of the AI, which is not just simply an algorithm.

19985801-1b4f-4e05-bb61-340e62b47f45.jpeg


https://www.spiceworks.com/tech/art...cles/how-does-ai-learn-through-ml-algorithms/
Notice how it says "machine learning algorithms are the computer programs that can learn from data". The algorithms are in the training. Not the final result.
 
Last edited:
I expected you to say this. I remember you said the same about hobby and professional programmers. Now we have also chat gpt programmers. That code sucks if it's not handled properly. Same as with junior code - if someone doesn't refactor it, it will suck big time. I would highly recommend to learn coding the old way - code quality and handling of different scenarios is much better this way.
Exactly, I don't see how a non programmer or someone with 0 knowledge on how to handle codes will use chatGPT for programming, That's for now, I don't know about the future.
 
Yes, Chatgpt doesnt generate anything interesting so far. All new inventions are mostly hype. Inventions rate slows down 8% a year. From 1990 to 2000 the world changest more then from 2000-2023
 
Yes, Chatgpt doesnt generate anything interesting so far. All new inventions are mostly hype. Inventions rate slows down 8% a year. From 1990 to 2000 the world changest more then from 2000-2023
I was just on a walk and thought we have improved about 10% at best, so I was pretty close to your number.

Everything has changed but only by a small factor. I would say, everything is the same as in 2010, but 10% different.

But for our perception it's like a new world because perception and time are tricky, right.
 
been getting good results idk why ur getting bad ones kinda weird
 
Back
Top