Massive Link building strategy?

Joined
Jan 22, 2023
Messages
25
Reaction score
3
Let's suppose we have a blog with 100 pages. Each blog post has the content optimized for one keyword each.
If we build a PBN made of 1000 websites (each website has a 40+ DA)
If we publish 100 contextual articles with contextual links to each of the blog posts. Doing this we would have 100 contenxtual articles x 1000 PBN websites = 10000 different articles. Will this strategy get us ranked to #1 on Google for most of the keywords ?


My team already did this in the last 3 weeks. With a smaller scale (200 instead of 1000). We got already many keywords on page 2. Sometimes (we use random proxies) we see the results on page #3, page #4. Can this strategy get us top 1 ?
 
Last edited:
I believe it can go page 1, yet question is how long it can sustain?
 
Chance to be there, But need to chose the good quality PBN.Of course, It works well for being on top position too.
 
You should also take into account on-page engagement. If that isn't as Google wants it, #1 rankings would be hard to achieve and sustain, regardless of backlinks.
 
Google first page is not an big deal , it depends on the comp and the volume for keywords , plus you ranked moreover but how can you stable the rankings .
 
Google first page is not an big deal , it depends on the comp and the volume for keywords , plus you ranked moreover but how can you stable the rankings .


You should also take into account on-page engagement. If that isn't as Google wants it, #1 rankings would be hard to achieve and sustain, regardless of backlinks.


How about using rotational proxies and making a robot to manually click the links
 
How about using rotational proxies and making a robot to manually click the links
On-page engagement is not only about clicking, it's about staying on-page, interacting with the page, browsing through other internal pages from that page, and, Google knows how to diferentiate between proxified bot traffic and real logged in users, with browsing history... It's way more complicated than that.
 
On-page engagement is not only about clicking, it's about staying on-page, interacting with the page, browsing through other internal pages from that page, and, Google knows how to diferentiate between proxified bot traffic and real logged in users, with browsing history... It's way more complicated than that.
You are wrong. Google can't spy users to know how much do they stay and how many clicks they do. Unless you have Google Analytics and or Adsense installed. I won't use both.
Google is only able to track how many people click on your link in their search results. It is also able to track how many people return back to the search results and click the next result.
The traffic between users and websites is encrypted using SSL.
 
You are wrong. Google can't spy users to know how much do they stay and how many clicks they do. Unless you have Google Analytics and or Adsense installed. I won't use both.
Google is only able to track how many people click on your link in their search results. It is also able to track how many people return back to the search results and click the next result.
The traffic between users and websites is encrypted using SSL.
You're right.

And then, who do you think Google will prioritize in ranks?

1. A site having analytics and showing high user engagement.
2. A site without analytics where they can't track user engagement.
 
You're right.

And then, who do you think Google will prioritize in ranks?

1. A site having analytics and showing high user engagement.
2. A site without analytics where they can't track user engagement.
I think 95% of websites do no use Google Analytics. I don't think medium, wikipedia uses Google Analytics. I might be wrong.
 
Let's suppose we have a blog with 100 pages. Each blog post has the content optimized for one keyword each.
If we build a PBN made of 1000 websites (each website has a 40+ DA)
If we publish 100 contextual articles with contextual links to each of the blog posts. Doing this we would have 100 contenxtual articles x 1000 PBN websites = 10000 different articles. Will this strategy get us ranked to #1 on Google for most of the keywords ?


My team already did this in the last 3 weeks. With a smaller scale (200 instead of 1000). We got already many keywords on page 2. Sometimes (we use random proxies) we see the results on page #3, page #4. Can this strategy get us top 1 ?
If all your domain is on the same IP, possible it will not going to work for long as it is detected by the algorithm.
 
If all your domain is on the same IP, possible it will not going to work for long as it is detected by the algorithm.
Good point. We are using cloudflare. Same server, but using cloudflare.

In theory, yes, you can reach the top #1.

But only if the PBNs are set up well. And they are good quality expired domains.
Our biggest concern is the following: We have many pages (over 100 pages) that we want to rank. We think Google might not consider more than 5 unique backlinks from each PBN domain. Could our concern be true ?
 
Good point. We are using cloudflare. Same server, but using cloudflare.


Our biggest concern is the following: We have many pages (over 100 pages) that we want to rank. We think Google might not consider more than 5 unique backlinks from each PBN website. Could our concern be true ?
Keep 1 PBN for 1 page. That's what I would recommend.

But its totally your decision.
 
Good point. We are using cloudflare. Same server, but using cloudflare.


Our biggest concern is the following: We have many pages (over 100 pages) that we want to rank. We think Google might not consider more than 5 unique backlinks from each PBN domain. Could our concern be true ?
it will work fine If you try to avoid sub-IP because they belong to the same class.
 
Back
Top