Don't waste time using ChatGPT 100% content

Obviously, it's not about doing a copy/paste of the content directly from ChatGPT. I think you have to be like a editor reviewing the content generated by ChatGPT. In other words, you have to give the content a "human touch".

It is not "obvious" at all, and I am sure it is not necessary. The idea is quantity over quality, and I promise that the most successful people online are doing it with automated (or almost entirely automated) quantity. If editing works for you, great, especially good for people who speak English as a second language I guess. But there will always be ways to use lower quality AI generated content.
 
You can use a paraphrasing tool to rewrite the article. After that, use Deepl for better sentences.
 
See the example below:

ChatGPT identifies the primary keyword and a secondary keyword (or key phrase) and repeats this 6 and 4 times, respectively. In a text of 206 words, this is absurd.

This makes the text highly predictable, repetitive and of low quality.

Any AI-text detector can see that this was not the work of a human being, Google which has the best technology available with its almost infinite budget can identify this in a second.

View attachment 237862

Human behavior, of course would be to avoid such repetition and replace these words with synonyms, or simply use pronouns to avoid over-mentioning the same words.

A checker I used (free and very simple), gave this result for the text above, created 100% with ChatGPT. The current trend in ChatGPT technologies is precisely to identify a keyword and repeat it. The longer the keyword or key phrase, the more obvious it becomes that it is a machine that is writing it.

View attachment 237865

Okay, so what do I do?

Simply copy and paste the text created by ChatGPT, open a synonym dictionary and replace this bunch of repetitions by other words, by pronouns or simply delete when unnecessary.

Write a new paragraph in your own words and be happy using this in the right way, as an assistant.

I strongly believe that in a few years we will be using this without any modification, however, today, January 02, 2023, this is not possible, if you just copy and paste the text, any free checker analysis can tell that this is done by a machine.

So obviously Open AI-3 or ChatGPT are still far from being able to replace human text creators, unless you hire very low quality people to write your articles.

People who use ChatGPT in the same way you described are not very smart :eek: These people are lazy and these are the same people who are looking for a way to make money by just clicking one button. Who's crazy enough to copy/paste without proofreading and arranging the text?

ChatGPT cannot replace an article writer, however, if like me you are used to writing your articles manually, ChatGPT is the perfect assistant that will help you create very good articles very quickly. Editing a text is much faster to do than writing an entire text ;)

Best Regards
 
Didn't know about that A.I detector.
I will check it..

Thanks
 
Let's say three blog owners decide to write an article on the topic "how to make muffins" and decide to use Chat GPT for the task...what are the odds that they'll end up with similar-sounding articles?

Good, talented human writers are here to stay mates! Human creativity is divine. That said, you're better off using AI as opposed to hiring low-quality writers who merely rewrite whatever stuff they come across on the web.
 
ill tell you this.. chatgpt is great for writing code and scripts though
 
It is not "obvious" at all, and I am sure it is not necessary. The idea is quantity over quality, and I promise that the most successful people online are doing it with automated (or almost entirely automated) quantity. If editing works for you, great, especially good for people who speak English as a second language I guess. But there will always be ways to use lower quality AI generated content.

The problem is that it can work for a while, but eventually Google could ban a website doing that. In fact, Google is getting better detecting AI generated content, so maybe in a year or even less doing a copy/paste of ChatGPT or Jasper won't work. But if you can write two or three articles daily with AI and making little changes to each article, Google shouldn't get upset. Anyway, I'm only guessing...
 
See the example below:

ChatGPT identifies the primary keyword and a secondary keyword (or key phrase) and repeats this 6 and 4 times, respectively. In a text of 206 words, this is absurd.

This makes the text highly predictable, repetitive and of low quality.

Any AI-text detector can see that this was not the work of a human being, Google which has the best technology available with its almost infinite budget can identify this in a second.

View attachment 237862

Human behavior, of course would be to avoid such repetition and replace these words with synonyms, or simply use pronouns to avoid over-mentioning the same words.

A checker I used (free and very simple), gave this result for the text above, created 100% with ChatGPT. The current trend in ChatGPT technologies is precisely to identify a keyword and repeat it. The longer the keyword or key phrase, the more obvious it becomes that it is a machine that is writing it.

View attachment 237865

Okay, so what do I do?

Simply copy and paste the text created by ChatGPT, open a synonym dictionary and replace this bunch of repetitions by other words, by pronouns or simply delete when unnecessary.

Write a new paragraph in your own words and be happy using this in the right way, as an assistant.

I strongly believe that in a few years we will be using this without any modification, however, today, January 02, 2023, this is not possible, if you just copy and paste the text, any free checker analysis can tell that this is done by a machine.

So obviously Open AI-3 or ChatGPT are still far from being able to replace human text creators, unless you hire very low quality people to write your articles.

hey :) There is a trick xD

AFaAEuv
 
See the example below:

ChatGPT identifies the primary keyword and a secondary keyword (or key phrase) and repeats this 6 and 4 times, respectively. In a text of 206 words, this is absurd.

This makes the text highly predictable, repetitive and of low quality.

Any AI-text detector can see that this was not the work of a human being, Google which has the best technology available with its almost infinite budget can identify this in a second.

View attachment 237862

Human behavior, of course would be to avoid such repetition and replace these words with synonyms, or simply use pronouns to avoid over-mentioning the same words.

A checker I used (free and very simple), gave this result for the text above, created 100% with ChatGPT. The current trend in ChatGPT technologies is precisely to identify a keyword and repeat it. The longer the keyword or key phrase, the more obvious it becomes that it is a machine that is writing it.

View attachment 237865

Okay, so what do I do?

Simply copy and paste the text created by ChatGPT, open a synonym dictionary and replace this bunch of repetitions by other words, by pronouns or simply delete when unnecessary.

Write a new paragraph in your own words and be happy using this in the right way, as an assistant.

I strongly believe that in a few years we will be using this without any modification, however, today, January 02, 2023, this is not possible, if you just copy and paste the text, any free checker analysis can tell that this is done by a machine.

So obviously Open AI-3 or ChatGPT are still far from being able to replace human text creators, unless you hire very low quality people to write your articles.
you get the answer to your question. If you want content for your blog, ask for content.
but remember chatgpt is not created for creating content.
 
''mustard and ketchup'' - repeated 5 times
Don't want to use AI, then don't use ;)
In few years internet will be spammed with AI generated content and those people who start now will win
Google really don't care about many things they tell they care. Including repetitions or even copy&pasted content
 
As far as writing quality goes, it does the job. The tool itself tells some bullshit at times. But, so does Jasper AI.
To play around, I had them both write the same content on the same theme.
Both tools told me totally wrong nonsense.
I've been testing for several days and honestly, in both cases, it takes some rewriting.
 
ChatGPT is awesome for our work as marketers, content writers, and copywriters. You just need to edit a few things saves a lot of time and 99% of nonmarketers have seriously no idea about AI writing and don't care.
 
Dont use "Write me an article about XXXX and use these 10 keywrods xxx xxx xxx" then chatgpt will just give a shitty article

But, ask it to ( write me an article about XXXX that are XXX words long, and try using some of these keywords when they make sense " XXX XXX XXX XXX " dont overuse them )



ChatGPT is a literal baby, that needs to be told explicitly what to do, and it will do it. If you make it think on your own, it will take the easiest way out, for me it makes really nice articles and posts, but you have to feed it what to do properly.
 
Dont use "Write me an article about XXXX and use these 10 keywrods xxx xxx xxx" then chatgpt will just give a shitty article

But, ask it to ( write me an article about XXXX that are XXX words long, and try using some of these keywords when they make sense " XXX XXX XXX XXX " dont overuse them )



ChatGPT is a literal baby, that needs to be told explicitly what to do, and it will do it. If you make it think on your own, it will take the easiest way out, for me it makes really nice articles and posts, but you have to feed it what to do properly.
I ask "talk me about XXXXXXXXX"
But, sometimes, it fails :)
 
I believe this is the problem with "fine-tuning the prompt". But don't ask me how. I'm not there - now ...
 
Back
Top