ChatGpt Unique Content Or Copied ?

[ErrlyBird]

Has anyone tried ChatGpt content for Google adsense approval. Is this ai replace to approve adsense or may be rank on SE. After investing my lot's of times I found that it is the dead end for SEO blogger, website etc. Anyway i think they also copy content from other website and place the best answer for us. What you guys think ?

Have you tried throwing any of the text in a plagiarism checker? Because I have, and so far it's all been 100% authentic for the results I got. I've seen a couple people mention they had like 30% ish copied content in some of their queries. There have also been tests of people asking the same questions on different accounts and the text being different each time.

That being said, I wouldn't use it straight off the chat and would make my own personal changes if I were to use any of it.

Check out this article which talks a little bit about it.
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/chatgpt-for-content-and-seo/473823/

 

[roshansai]

you want some gain take some risk. no one will give you definite answer cause what they say it's fact
for some it's working for some it's not. how they prompt and generate article from it is diff, no to mention diff niche, domain, seo, backlink strategy etc.
so yes it can be used for google adsense approval. but there is a way you need more, not just click and generate. what it is. pay the cost and learn it.

Ah yup now I got the idea thanks mate

 

[dvc]

This is the ai answer to your question


"How can you generate content. Do you get it from internet ?"


As an artificial intelligence, I am not able to browse the internet or access any information that is not part of my training data. I am able to generate content by using the knowledge and understanding that I have been trained on to create original responses to questions and prompts. My responses are generated based on patterns and structures in the data that I was trained on, and my ability to generate content is limited to the scope of that training data.
For example, if you ask me a question about a specific topic, I can use my understanding of that topic and my ability to generate text to provide an informative and coherent response. However, if the topic falls outside of my training data, I may not be able to provide a meaningful response.

 

[lewwy789]

That's not how "he" gets his infos currently. All it's infos is limited till 2021. He was fed a huge shit ton of data over the years and trained to answer questions. As of today, chatgpt CAN'T access internet.

Thanks for explaining that to me, I couldn't think of another way it would be able to do it but that makes sense.

 

[dvc]

Thanks for explaining that to me, I couldn't think of another way it would be able to do it but that makes sense.

I copied above how he does it. That is his own answer to the op question.

 

[roshansai]

Chat gpt can't access internet. Arey you listening guys what he is saying. Lmao

That's not how "he" gets his infos currently. All it's infos is limited till 2021. He was fed a huge shit ton of data over the years and trained to answer questions. As of today, chatgpt CAN'T access internet.

 

[dvc]

Chat gpt can't access internet. Arey you listening guys what he is saying. Lmao

Ok, I'm stoping here.. you're clearly still away from understanding what AI does and how it collect data. Comeback when you do so we can discuss the topic @roshansai

 

[lewwy789]

Chat gpt can't access internet. Arey you listening guys what he is saying. Lmao

You're both rude and stupid well done.
https://www.google.com/search?q=can...9i57j33i160.8403j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

 

[dvc]

You're both rude and stupid well done.
https://www.google.com/search?q=can...9i57j33i160.8403j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Can't see anything rude I wrote, was literally providing info and asking op to educate himself about the topic fully. Apologize if it passed as rude.

 

[lewwy789]

Can't see anything rude I wrote, was literally providing info and asking op to educate himself about the topic fully. Apologize if it passed as rude.

That was for op mate I quoted him not you.

 

[roshansai]

Can't see anything rude I wrote, was literally providing info and asking op to educate himself about the topic fully. Apologize if it passed as rude.

Hey guys be chill , let's take our leg to next step for generating millions of dollars through ChatGpt. Now or never

 

[dvc]

That was for op mate

Oh sorry about that.

 

[SimonBC]

Has anyone tried ChatGpt content for Google adsense approval. Is this ai replace to approve adsense or may be rank on SE. After investing my lot's of times I found that it is the dead end for SEO blogger, website etc. Anyway i think they also copy content from other website and place the best answer for us. What you guys think ?

I have used ChatGPT output on two pre-approved (new version) Google News sites and its content is being indexed and ranked within a couple of minutes on one site and a couple of hours on the other.

One article I posted today is already at position 1 (desktop & mobile) for a zero search item with the following metrics (see screen shot below) according to Keywords Everywhere.

This site stats wise, has a DA of about 30, a DR of 34 and authority score on Semrush of 32. when I hover over a URL on the Serps, Google says it was indexed over 10 years ago, and I have owned the site for the last two years.

In total I have added about 15 ChatGPT articles to the site in the past few days. they range in length from 1,200 - 3,000 words and are all indexed within minutes (max an hour) and about 1/3 of them are currently in positions 1 - 22 on Google. The site has about 90 articles in total on it, with an average length of about 1,700 words.

This is actually better than what I have been achieving on the site with manually created articles. I am focussing on purely informational articles such as 'how to xxxxxxxxxx' and the niche is lifestyle.

The other site I put an article on has no authority at all and the article still indexed within a couple of hours and is still indexed though it has dropped from around position 42 on the Serps when it was first indexed to about position 80.

This site covers international politics and the article was about the current war in Syria (about 2.5k words). it is competing with the UN, USA government, CNN, Washington Post, EU, Brookings Institute, BBC etc. I literally put it up as the ultimate test to see if it would get indexed at all.

In summary, I have found ChatGPT articles index and rank pretty much as anything else (if not better). I always get my sites into Google News just for the fast indexing, nothing else).

But they have not resulted in much additional traffic (yet) and whether these articles retain any position long term, get any traffic, or the website gets approved for Adsense, I really don't know

I will reply here again in a few days time if there is any change with indexing, position, or adsense approval (or not), until then, good luck all.

​

 

[dvc]

I have used ChatGPT output on two pre-approved (new version) Google News sites and its content is being indexed and ranked within a couple of minutes on one site and a couple of hours on the other.

One article I posted today is already at position 1 (desktop & mobile) for a zero search item with the following metrics (see screen shot below) according to Keywords Everywhere.

This site stats wise, has a DA of about 30, a DR of 34 and authority score on Semrush of 32. when I hover over a URL on the Serps, Google says it was indexed over 10 years ago, and I have owned the site for the last two years.

In total I have added about 15 ChatGPT articles to the site in the past few days. they range in length from 1,200 - 3,000 words and are all indexed within minutes (max an hour) and about 1/3 of them are currently in positions 1 - 22 on Google. The site has about 90 articles in total on it, with an average length of about 1,700 words.

This is actually better than what I have been achieving on the site with manually created articles. I am focussing on purely informational articles such as 'how to xxxxxxxxxx' and the niche is lifestyle.

The other site I put an article on has no authority at all and the article still indexed within a couple of hours and is still indexed though it has dropped from around position 42 on the Serps when it was first indexed to about position 80.

This site covers international politics and the article was about the current war in Syria (about 2.5k words). it is competing with the UN, USA government, CNN, Washington Post, EU, Brookings Institute, BBC etc. I literally put it up as the ultimate test to see if it would get indexed at all.

In summary, I have found ChatGPT articles index and rank pretty much as anything else (if not better). I always get my sites into Google News just for the fast indexing, nothing else).

But they have not resulted in much additional traffic (yet) and whether these articles retain any position long term, get any traffic, or the website gets approved for Adsense, I really don't know

I will reply here again in a few days time if there is any change with indexing, position, or adsense approval (or not), until then, good luck all.

View attachment 235867​

That's what I like to see. Go fo it, it's the future.

 

[roshansai]

I have used ChatGPT output on two pre-approved (new version) Google News sites and its content is being indexed and ranked within a couple of minutes on one site and a couple of hours on the other.

One article I posted today is already at position 1 (desktop & mobile) for a zero search item with the following metrics (see screen shot below) according to Keywords Everywhere.

This site stats wise, has a DA of about 30, a DR of 34 and authority score on Semrush of 32. when I hover over a URL on the Serps, Google says it was indexed over 10 years ago, and I have owned the site for the last two years.

In total I have added about 15 ChatGPT articles to the site in the past few days. they range in length from 1,200 - 3,000 words and are all indexed within minutes (max an hour) and about 1/3 of them are currently in positions 1 - 22 on Google. The site has about 90 articles in total on it, with an average length of about 1,700 words.

This is actually better than what I have been achieving on the site with manually created articles. I am focussing on purely informational articles such as 'how to xxxxxxxxxx' and the niche is lifestyle.

The other site I put an article on has no authority at all and the article still indexed within a couple of hours and is still indexed though it has dropped from around position 42 on the Serps when it was first indexed to about position 80.

This site covers international politics and the article was about the current war in Syria (about 2.5k words). it is competing with the UN, USA government, CNN, Washington Post, EU, Brookings Institute, BBC etc. I literally put it up as the ultimate test to see if it would get indexed at all.

In summary, I have found ChatGPT articles index and rank pretty much as anything else (if not better). I always get my sites into Google News just for the fast indexing, nothing else).

But they have not resulted in much additional traffic (yet) and whether these articles retain any position long term, get any traffic, or the website gets approved for Adsense, I really don't know

I will reply here again in a few days time if there is any change with indexing, position, or adsense approval (or not), until then, good luck all.

View attachment 235867​

Ok bro I am also on test mode.

 

[Tomatoweb]

You can use it its possible

 

[Killswitchs]

from what I have heard chatgpt is 100% unique content. maybe a little spin can make it even more unique

 

[Marco69]

In the deep back of my mind I be little bit sceptic, that this all ai hype will get you into a trap- google trap.

That means, 100 people typing in the same precise prompts to create an article (same style and topic+ title) do you think that chatgpt will then create 100 different very uniqueness contents? I'm not sure, thi swill be not possible for an ai machine.

So the trap would be the next years, more and more ai content most are similar the same, will coming out on google, then a new google update will rid them out of the G library and will improve the sites with unique business=
unique content, podcasts, videos , etc,etc...only these will survive, same for adsense and affiliate

G is part of a big elitist society maybe something liberal, but Bing is a bigger elitist.... I never heard of that elitist make the life of us folks better and increasing our income and business opportunities.

Use ai as a tool to reuse content,create new unique content, make exist content better (twist it) but not doing 1:1 ai without any twists (your own words) and additional facts, tips whatsoever, then the chance is high that you will fall to the G trap the next years.

 

[kalpana007]

Has anyone tried ChatGpt content for Google adsense approval. Is this ai replace to approve adsense or may be rank on SE. After investing my lot's of times I found that it is the dead end for SEO blogger, website etc. Anyway i think they also copy content from other website and place the best answer for us. What you guys think ?

I have tried AI content for adsense approval on one site and it got rejected. But I am still not sure about the reason as it can be because of other issues also like they found content to be repetitive or common.

 

[paisawaisa]

Mate, dont rely much on xhat people say. I have been making content using the ai since it was out. A couple of articles are already indexed.

I used to work with other ai content generators in the past, made entire sites with multiple articles in them, they were indexed and ranked and brought money.

Whenever someone says it wont work, it's usually people who never tried it and only read someone says it online, or content writers.

Which platform you used to make money with those sites? Was it adsense? Why did you not scale this if it was working good?