reviews for the best spinner

[pratishtha]

hi all,

i just came to know about "the best spinner" (article re writer software) and i saw video too and i found it good.. in comparison of other article re writer or spinner as they all produce non sense articles! has anyone used the best spinner? what are your reviews about it? is it worth buying? please suggest me as i'm thinking to buy it..

 

[primaking]

i just bought it, playing with it now and the software seems easy to use, just a few click to choose the words and done. going to send those articles out to test.

 

[dtrance]

The software is expensive.You pay a subscription of $84 per year.Also,its not a desktop application.It operates online only.

 

[Niche31]

Also,its not a desktop application.It operates online only.

Not true. While the application *DOES* require online activation, and the thesaurus database obviously is online... The program itself is run from your computer and not an online portal.

 

[genebadd]

Its a good spinner, it still requires effort to make a decent article though. I still use power article rewriter for some things, like for example, it's easier to drop a list of long tail keywords into an href tag with power article rewriter than it is with the best spinner. Over all I am happy with the program, it seems to be getting better with time as more updates come out too. If you are looking for unique content and your not worried about how it reads, you can have 30% unique articles in a matter of minutes.

 

[aj113]

From the video, it's kinda like like using an online thesaurus. It doesn't actually create a spinning article, you have to create it yourself. That gives me an idea - why not use an online thesaurus to create spinning articles? Oh yeah - I already do that.

 

[juice]

I've used the program. It works very well and it is user friendly.

 

[topper99]

From the video, it's kinda like like using an online thesaurus. It doesn't actually create a spinning article, you have to create it yourself. That gives me an idea - why not use an online thesaurus to create spinning articles? Oh yeah - I already do that.

..then how is it different from Wordflood?

Thanks!

 

[dearac]

I love the program. I can make link wheels in about 15 min. I just paste an article in it, then I click "replace everyone's favorites", and boom done. All I have to do is paste the articles in my link wheel sites.

 

[aj113]

..then how is it different from Wordflood?

Thanks!

Basically - it isn't.

I think really people are duped into believeing it's an article spinner because it has the word 'spinner' in the title. Promarily it's not a spinner, it's a thesaurus, and it works - as you say - just like wordflood, which in turn is not really much different to using a thesaurus.

A genuine spinner would have: article in one end ==> new content out the other end.

 

[mastershake]

the noob question i guess i have now is

"assuming i am lifting articles from random sites that compete content wise, what spinner or tool would be best to save me a bulk amount of time to re-post the content on a single site running on wordpress?"

 

[dikembe mutombo]

I use it and sometimes PAR. I like the sentence editing better in PAR but I like the way you can tab through words to spin them in TBS. It was half off sometime last month but I think that's over now. Overall I like it a lot.

 

[tygrus]

I did some tests using the free trial and made articles that were between 50-75% unique. They needed some manual fixing to get them there, the program wouldn't do it. I then checked them with copyscape and they did not pass.

 

[aj113]

the noob question i guess i have now is

"assuming i am lifting articles from random sites that compete content wise, what spinner or tool would be best to save me a bulk amount of time to re-post the content on a single site running on wordpress?"

Content Hurricane

 

[genebadd]

Basically - it isn't.

I think really people are duped into believeing it's an article spinner because it has the word 'spinner' in the title. Promarily it's not a spinner, it's a thesaurus, and it works - as you say - just like wordflood, which in turn is not really much different to using a thesaurus.

A genuine spinner would have: article in one end ==> new content out the other end.

I tend to disagree a little, it's a manual spinner in the sense that when you are all done with editing you will be left with an article made up of spin context. Unlike the automatic spinners which usually spit out garbage, this tool, like power article rewriter, allows you to control the quality of the spin, which does take more time obviously.

 

[aj113]

In other words it's not a spinner, it's an editor. A bit like using notepad and a thesaurus. No, a lot like using notepad and a thesaurus. How about that for 'controlling the quality of the spin'?

 

[BedokBlau]

This thread really cleared up a few things for me because I'd had a different image of the best spinner before reading it. If, basically, its power stops at achieving the same tasks as PAR (which I actually have used), then maybe it makes sense to stick with that - especially if the PAR handles sentences better as a whole.