Antidetect Browser feature

[hoverounds]

Do these browsers not leak any machine information? I know they spoof user agent but are they able to fully spoof the hardware data without any leaks?

Open to any suggestions, thanks

 

[FarmCloud]

Nope, browsers cannot mask all the stuff, but can do it good enough.

Exaggerated example of this if you run "mac machine" form win. Here (https://browserleaks.com/canvas) you will be detected anyway as a win machine. And vice versa
So you need at least use mac emitation via mac and win emitation via win.
And there is a lot of points that can leak but whats more important - does it matter? For work with Facebook current popular anti-detect browsers work pretty good.

Anyway. Possible solution for you, if you seek great hardware+software print, might be to work from a real Mac device via separate users for different accounts.

 

[Surfinite]

Do these browsers not leak any machine information? I know they spoof user agent but are they able to fully spoof the hardware data without any leaks?

Open to any suggestions, thanks

If you use a good antidetect, then there should be no problems. But as the person above said, it's better to create profiles of the same OS on which the browser is running, because the OS can be detected by installed fonts and canvas prints if the services compare them with their database of user fingerprints. To work with advertising networks and social networks, the antidetect browser will definitely be the best option.

Nope, browsers cannot mask all the stuff, but can do it good enough.

Exaggerated example of this if you run "mac machine" form win. Here (https://browserleaks.com/canvas) you will be detected anyway as a win machine. And vice versa
So you need at least use mac emitation via mac and win emitation via win.
And there is a lot of points that can leak but whats more important - does it matter? For work with Facebook current popular anti-detect browsers work pretty good.

Anyway. Possible solution for you, if you seek great hardware+software print, might be to work from a real Mac device via separate users for different accounts.

I would not say that using different OS profiles for multi-accounting is the best solution. This is not so convenient and does not add more security when working with accounts.

 

[hoverounds]

If you use a good antidetect, then there should be no problems. But as the person above said, it's better to create profiles of the same OS on which the browser is running, because the OS can be detected by installed fonts and canvas prints if the services compare them with their database of user fingerprints. To work with advertising networks and social networks, the antidetect browser will definitely be the best option.


I would not say that using different OS profiles for multi-accounting is the best solution. This is not so convenient and does not add more security when working with accounts.

Thanks for your response! So do these antidetect browsers use some method to look like they are on a different machine/OS? They have to be doing more than just spoofing a user agent string

 

[hoverounds]

Nope, browsers cannot mask all the stuff, but can do it good enough.

Exaggerated example of this if you run "mac machine" form win. Here (https://browserleaks.com/canvas) you will be detected anyway as a win machine. And vice versa
So you need at least use mac emitation via mac and win emitation via win.
And there is a lot of points that can leak but whats more important - does it matter? For work with Facebook current popular anti-detect browsers work pretty good.

Anyway. Possible solution for you, if you seek great hardware+software print, might be to work from a real Mac device via separate users for different accounts.

My issue is that isn't scalable for my needs, anti detect browsers gets around this hardware detection somehow?

 

[Surfinite]

Thanks for your response! So do these antidetect browsers use some method to look like they are on a different machine/OS? They have to be doing more than just spoofing a user agent string

There is a lot of other params, which are spoofed. Navigator(client hints, cpu arch, ram size, etc.), fonts, gpu, screen size, etc.

 

[hoverounds]

There is a lot of other params, which are spoofed. Navigator(client hints, cpu arch, ram size, etc.), fonts, gpu, screen size, etc.

Why doesn't someone release an extension that spoofs these things? Is there an extra layer anti-detect browsers need in order to spoof the machine/OS details?

 

[Surfinite]

Why doesn't someone release an extension that spoofs these things? Is there an extra layer anti-detect browsers need in order to spoof the machine/OS details?

There are such extensions, but they will always work worse than a separate browser, because they change the fingerprint through javascript and not all things can be implemented qualitatively through it, and some things cannot be done at all.

 

[hoverounds]

There are such extensions, but they will always work worse than a separate browser, because they change the fingerprint through javascript and not all things can be implemented qualitatively through it, and some things cannot be done at all.

So anti-detect browsers like yours do more than spoof a user agent string? They look like a non-suspicious machine that won't be flagged? Is the browser encapsulated in a VPS or something to achieve this since some sites can see past a browser?

 

[Ormosis]

There are such extensions, but they will always work worse than a separate browser, because they change the fingerprint through javascript and not all things can be implemented qualitatively through it, and some things cannot be done at all.

Moreover, browser extensions can be detected to a certain extent. They make your browser fingerprint more unique, thus, more detectable. When possible, keep the default settings or only adjust the bare minimum.

So anti-detect browsers like yours do more than spoof a user agent string? They look like a non-suspicious machine that won't be flagged? Is the browser encapsulated in a VPS or something to achieve this since some sites can see past a browser?

Anti-detect browsers do far more than spoofing your user agent string, but they're not perfect. It's nearly impossible to spoof the canvas fingerprint into something non-suspicious, let alone realistic. Most software achieves this by applying a "noise" to your fingerprint, masking the original.

In other words: this technology is not perfect, but good enough for most things. I am not speaking about Surfnite as I've never used it.

 

[hoverounds]

Moreover, browser extensions can be detected to a certain extent. They make your browser fingerprint more unique, thus, more detectable. When possible, keep the default settings or only adjust the bare minimum.



Anti-detect browsers do far more than spoofing your user agent string, but they're not perfect. It's nearly impossible to spoof the canvas fingerprint into something non-suspicious, let alone realistic. Most software achieves this by applying a "noise" to your fingerprint, masking the original.

In other words: this technology is not perfect, but good enough for most things. I am not speaking about Surfnite as I've never used it.

Thanks for the insight! I guess I'm still a little confused as to how this "noise" is created... it needs to spoof the machine side somehow and the only way I can think of is wrapping it in a VPS though I am far from knowledgeable on the subject. If it doesn't than however it's spoofed can be programmed in with an extension though I understand the extension then makes the fingerprint unique

 

[Ormosis]

Thanks for the insight! I guess I'm still a little confused as to how this "noise" is created... it needs to spoof the machine side somehow and the only way I can think of is wrapping it in a VPS though I am far from knowledgeable on the subject. If it doesn't than however it's spoofed can be programmed in with an extension though I understand the extension then makes the fingerprint unique

I suppose it can be spoofed through extensions. From my understanding, most of these extensions work by injecting JS into web pages - rather than applying changes at a machine level. Anti-detect browsers allow you to create hundreds of profiles, making it infeasible for them to wrap each profile around a VPS. Depending on the software, most of times you are either "stealing" a real user's fingerprint or generating a brand-new one.

If you need to work with browser extensions, a browser like Incogniton allows you to "mask" your browser extensions and make it appear as if don't have any. However, please keep in mind that each change is inevitably going to make your fingerprint more unique. Your ultimate goal is to look like an average user. Please note I am in no way affiliated with Incogniton, I did use it and it works decently, but it doesn't pass advanced checks like iphey.com.

 

[497quangtrung]

I tried use multibrowser.io and this is best antidetect browser.

 

[hoverounds]

Thanks for all your help I'll do some more research

 

[hoverounds]

I suppose it can be spoofed through extensions. From my understanding, most of these extensions work by injecting JS into web pages - rather than applying changes at a machine level. Anti-detect browsers allow you to create hundreds of profiles, making it infeasible for them to wrap each profile around a VPS. Depending on the software, most of times you are either "stealing" a real user's fingerprint or generating a brand-new one.

If you need to work with browser extensions, a browser like Incogniton allows you to "mask" your browser extensions and make it appear as if don't have any. However, please keep in mind that each change is inevitably going to make your fingerprint more unique. Your ultimate goal is to look like an average user. Please note I am in no way affiliated with Incogniton, I did use it and it works decently, but it doesn't pass advanced checks like iphey.com.

If I want to see which anti detect browsers pass advanced checks what site should I use to check?

 

[Ormosis]

If I want to see which anti detect browsers pass advanced checks what site should I use to check?

As far as I know, iphey.com is the only one that gives you a clear yes-or-no answer. If you are looking for more in-depth analysis, you can use https://amiunique.org/fp. I didn't try all the anti-detect browsers out there, but in my experience, Multilogin is a notch above everything else.

 

[hoverounds]

As far as I know, iphey.com is the only one that gives you a clear yes-or-no answer. If you are looking for more in-depth analysis, you can use https://amiunique.org/fp. I didn't try all the anti-detect browsers out there, but in my experience, Multilogin is a notch above everything else.

Thank you I appreciate the help!

 

[imccafey]

Strictly speaking, there's a lot of ways a web service can track you. From the resolution of your browser, down to the font you use on your PC or mobile. Anti-detect browsers are not a fix-all solution but, when applied correctly, it covers a massive base against fingerprinting it's intended to cover. Using proxies along with anti-detect browsers is usually what I'd consider as baseline in preventing fingerprinting.

 

[FarmCloud]

If I want to see which anti detect browsers pass advanced checks what site should I use to check?

This is also good tool https://pixelscan.net/

 

[MoreLoginTeam]

No, they don't give out user information. You can use morelogin, a reliable and inexpensive anti-detection browser.