[Solution] Having indexing issue lately? Why Google de-index your backlinks? - The explanation

NeedMyLink

Elite Member
Jr. VIP
Joined
Nov 23, 2020
Messages
5,930
Reaction score
1,696
I've seen many people on BHW complaining that their links are getting out of the Google Index massively. The same requests I've got from my clients lately. The problem is getting really serious, right? I have also seen many index checkers (services & tools) such as Linkbox etc also show the massive de-index of users' backlinks.

Are links really so mass fall out of the Google Index? - Not really. Here is why..

Mostly link indexing services & tools, the same as users are used to check the Google indexing status with operator "site: URL". This is where the problem goes. Exactly this method (which is common in usage) is the key problem of "massive de-index". It works bad nowadays. That's it.

Although if you simply enter you URL (backlink's url) into Google search - the result may be different, and you can find your backlink indexed in this way.
If you have the batch of the links being deindexed - check them manualy with simple URL paste into the google search and compare the results with the well-known "site: URL" method. That is why many tools show mass dropping out of the index. But, it is purely on google checking method. So if you see a huge drop in the index of your links - do not hurry to squeeze the point. Everything is fine. Just fine.

P.S. Some people claim that this operator (site:URL) wasn't made to check the index status at all. I won't argue, but I stick to my opinion that it was, taking into account the binding of the operator to different popular index checking tools.

Wait until your checking tool drops update on their scripts and the problem will be completely solved)


I've checked 1000 backlinks of mine 1 month ago - there were 87% indexed. One week ago - it showed <60%. I've checked again manualy and the rate was the same as before - almost all the links are indexed. No drops.
wpsdVXx
 
yep, I always urged folks to just copy-paste / type their URLs into google instead of using site: but the problem is when you have 100s or 1000s of links to check daily. That's where an accurate checker would come in handy (although, Scrapebox can probably do this easily with 100s of proxies)
 
yep, I always urged folks to just copy-paste / type their URLs into google instead of using site: but the problem is when you have 100s or 1000s of links to check daily. That's where an accurate checker would come in handy (although, Scrapebox can probably do this easily with 100s of proxies)
Some of the checkers have already made new scripts so the checking process is correct
 
Yup you're right i've go thought this a lot and finally brings the solution my self. But still many links are in cached but not in index. Wounding is their any solution to index a de-indexed link again?
 
Yup you're right i've go thought this a lot and finally brings the solution my self. But still many links are in cached but not in index. Wounding is their any solution to index a de-indexed link again?
Indexers. There are many good indexing solution for such cases.
I also use some of them for myself when I have a few links de-indexed or so
 
@maxmayer we are in the middle of an algo update and as of the 25th any of my links submitted to OmegaIndexer have 0% success for both site: and posting url directly.

Before I had 80% success rate, so something has happened. I think low quality spammed to death blog posts with comment sections open for all dont work anymore which is what they used.

Can you try submitting some new links and let us know if you are having issues too?

Cheers
 
@maxmayer we are in the middle of an algo update and as of the 25th any of my links submitted to OmegaIndexer have 0% success for both site: and posting url directly.

Before I had 80% success rate, so something has happened. I think low quality spammed to death blog posts with comment sections open for all dont work anymore which is what they used.

Can you try submitting some new links and let us know if you are having issues too?

Cheers
Probably you use the wrong indexer and the real index % ratio is low
I check it everyday and I have no issues with indexing
 
Does anyone know what indexing method omega uses?
 
Good analysis , maybe the checker can be outdated that's why , But I always manually check them over and over .
 
Good analysis , maybe the checker can be outdated that's why , But I always manually check them over and over .
Manual checking is an old and well-working method, sure. Agree.
But not for the case when you have 1000+ pages to check index for :d
 
Back
Top