Is it possible to manage 100,000 websites?

[seo express]

I have seen a man who has a team of 10000 people and managing over 100000 websites at a time. How is he managing all of those websites?

 

[leechesBleechin]

I have seen a man who has a team of 10000 people and managing over 100000 websites at a time. How is he managing all of those websites?

By hiring 10,000 people to manage them. Not sure i understand the question. If you mean hierarchically speaking, Probably your typical organization style (teams, managers, manager managers, etc)

 

[BHAlienServices]

if they are so many it is easy

 

[Ndiqi]

If you have money you can certainly do it, it’s not a question anymore.

 

[bluematter]

I would be disappointed if 10k Staff is only managing 100k sites, I would fire them all. Slackers!

 

[Overrule0688]

By hiring 10,000 people to manage them. Not sure i understand the question. If you mean hierarchically speaking, Probably your typical organization style (teams, managers, manager managers, etc)

Was about to say the same thing. Have no idea what is the question here since you already have the answer. He has 10k people managing 100k websites, that's it.

 

[lotsofmoney]

You will have to hire a team to do this. I have seen people managing upto 1000 and they are super busy with this much only.

 

[HenryObi]

I have seen a man who has a team of 10000 people and managing over 100000 websites at a time. How is he managing all of those websites?

He probably doesn't have upto 10k staffs or they actually manage.more than 100k sites.

If 10k people manage only 100k sites then their productivity is actually low.

 

[lotsofmoney]

He probably doesn't have upto 10k staffs or they actually manage.more than 100k sites.

If 10k people manage only 100 sites then their productivity is actually low.

That brings us to 1 person for 10 sites. How is productivity low then?

 

[Titus Lotuss]

if oyu have a full on team, possible

 

[HenryObi]

That brings us to 1 person for 10 sites. How is productivity low then?

Remember most of the things you do on a site are repetitive, there are days you just check if everything is running fine.

When you work in organization, you would be allocated more tasks to do in such case.

To get the best out of the staff, each staff would not just be handed 10 sites to manage, they would underperform as seen in this case. You would have bunch of managers who would allocate different tasks to different staffs. If you are done with writing for site A, you proceed to site B. Something like that.


The managers would be responding for ensuring the quality of work done is good.

 

[BroTherm]

Depends on the meaning of manage and the type of sites. Not long a go I had a few K sites to "manage". With the proper systems set up, it's not that hard and the total number does not matter. Sites are scalable and not so hard to replicate.

 

[HiQ]

I need a full-time job + a team from here, Young Indians, in particular. (20-30) we can do it

 

[seo express]

I would be disappointed if 10k Staff is only managing 100k sites, I would fire them all. Slackers!

Why are you disappointed?

 

[darkinferno]

I have seen a man who has a team of 10000 people and managing over 100000 websites at a time. How is he managing all of those websites?

Where did you see it?

10k people is a whole building

 

[Pbnown]

yes possible

 

[MisterF]

Why are you disappointed?

It is 10 sites per person. That's all.

 

[seo express]

Where did you see it?

In a software house in pakistan

 

[SEO Devil]

As simple as that, he has 10k people managing 100k websites. It is 10 sites per person. That's all.

 

[flexpaydude]

Yes it is possible to manage as each person manages 10 sites