Helpful content update- My Ass

[Black Belt Spodermen]

 

[4ry4n]

This is a custom result just displayed for you, I think because you have an interest in Ai that Google has noted.

 

[SeoArrowLTD]

View attachment 223291

This made my day unique.

 

[Blue Panda]

Someone already posted it here

 

[tazarbm]

Someone already posted it here

indeed! But the response to this question had been 4 instead of 9

 

[Gogol]

Hahahah wtf!!

 

[SirLouen]

 

[MediaCircus56]

Exactly the answer I am looking for. So, yeah the update helps a lot.

 

[kimy]

Google updates are getting better...

 

[DeadJoe]

You do realize that the process is machine reliant? which means that it is never going to be 100% accurate. However, there will be better results compared to the previous results if you look at it overall. That's how it works. They are not going to send employees to check every search term and modify it manually right? so there will always be errors because they are using AI/automation to do it. Google still has better results than any other search engine.

 

[Alham12]

That's why I 'LOVE BHW' I get new INFO every day.
But today it's something freaking awesome.

 

[Amanii]

Hahaha

 

[Black Belt Spodermen]

indeed! But the response to this question had been 4 instead of 9

The same website lists three different answers to the same question. All of them are wrong. How helpful indeed,

 

[Kinu Actaz]

 

[Gogol]

This is a custom result just displayed for you, I think because you have an interest in Ai that Google has noted.

So that justifies the wrong answer? Think about other uses of this - political? Medical!?

Really think google should focus on getting the result accurate than focusing on stealing content and showing on google’s own platform.

 

[Alex_1729]

From that same article :

And when you read the actual article, you can see that someone is saying they're experimenting with an AI and it's not supposed to be factual. One more piece of clear evidence that Google doesn't read content.

 

[4ry4n]

So that justifies the wrong answer?

I have no comment on how Google should do their thing, I just searched for the same thing and it came out just correct so I wanted to point out that it seems a custom issue.

 

[Black Belt Spodermen]

I have no comment on how Google should do their thing, I just searched for the same thing and it came out just correct so I wanted to point out that it seems a custom issue.

The results will be a little different with keyword variations. However, that particular article still remains in the top 3 which is definitely not the right thing.

 

[Black Belt Spodermen]

From that same article :

View attachment 223309

And when you read the actual article, you can see that someone is saying they're experimenting with an AI and it's not supposed to be factual. One more piece of clear evidence that Google doesn't read content.

So, according to the first answer, I really need to check the Horse's Ass.

Oh, my title is accurate then cause I may also have a few eyes in my ass

Edit:- I get it. The horse easily kicks with its rear legs. So, it makes sense.

 

[4ry4n]

that particular article still remains in the top 3

Not for me, I don't even see that on the first serp.