Botting "Real" NFT / Crypto Twitter Followers

[jamesserany]

There are a few NFT Twitter accounts (eg. @GreatGoatsNFT & @AliensTrippin) that have clearly botted their followers, yet when you audit them on certain websites to see how many of their followers are fake, it says that majority of them are "real", despite that not being true.

If anyone has some type of method to bot Twitter followers (NFT related accounts) that can show up as "real" followers when audited, that would be great. Looking for something asap.

 

[dmister]

We can do that, Please check our website for all services : dmister.com/services

 

[BBQle]

It's a very simple thing that you need to look for here

 

[ProBoostSocial]

In order to be considered "real" by those audit sites accounts need to be:
1) older than 1 week
2) have a profile pic that is not the default one
3) have 10 tweets (retweets count)

That means it's pretty easy to trick those audit sites

 

[imccafey]

Yeah, it's worth noting how these audit sites consider an account to be "real". Usually there are metrics which if you find out, you can have a programed bot to basically tick those check boxes and pass off as real. It doesn't have to be real by our standards, it just has to be so based on a preset criteria.

 

[Bakidaki]

Yeah, it's worth noting how these audit sites consider an account to be "real". Usually there are metrics which if you find out, you can have a programed bot to basically tick those check boxes and pass off as real. It doesn't have to be real by our standards, it just has to be so based on a preset criteria.

exactly, regular people dont understand that these sites arent analyzing the followers one by one, they are using a stat checker tool and based on those results tell if its a bot or a real person.

 

[imccafey]

On a practicality standpoint, it makes sense why they have to set criteria for what constitutes a "real" account. With the volume of accounts they go through, realistically they're gonna want to automate the hell out of it. The alternative of hiring an actual person to go through each account and determine if it's real or not based on their judgement call is just not gonna happen.

 

[GrowerGuys]

Dont do it with new account you may get banned

 

[Bakidaki]

On a practicality standpoint, it makes sense why they have to set criteria for what constitutes a "real" account. With the volume of accounts they go through, realistically they're gonna want to automate the hell out of it. The alternative of hiring an actual person to go through each account and determine if it's real or not based on their judgement call is just not gonna happen.

im not saying they are doing anything wrong, tbh it cant be done by hand, it would take years.
just saying that these parameters can be tricked by people that know them, its simple actually.
you just make sure you tick all the boxes and voila you got an army of real accounts and not bots

 

[BBQle]

Is it real? I need

 

[imccafey]

im not saying they are doing anything wrong, tbh it cant be done by hand, it would take years.
just saying that these parameters can be tricked by people that know them, its simple actually.
you just make sure you tick all the boxes and voila you got an army of real accounts and not bots

I'm with ya there.
Seeing as there's something to gain from getting around those "anti-bot" checkers, the name of the game is mostly about finding out the general mean of those parameters and creating workarounds. In all, it's pretty much working smarter and not harder.

 

[Billywuk]

Just open new accounts using twitterdub and update the profiles to look like nft accounts. They will show up as real on a Twitter audit

 

[BBQle]

twitterdub,It looks tedious

 

[Billywuk]

twitterdub,It looks tedious

So do they all