Scrapebox Vs Easycontactbot

[cynic]

Thats what I do. seriously its lifetime updates, why not?

Does it scrape phone numbers ? I'm not fussed about e-mail addresses.

 

[loopline]

Does it scrape phone numbers ? I'm not fussed about e-mail addresses.

yes of course

 

[footsystem]

IMHO scraping is best with scrapebox and sending contact forms is easiest with website contact - gsa.

scrapebox can submit to a LOT of contact forms, IF you train it. It was meant to be trained by users and scrapebox does literally like 10,000 things and costs less then gsa website contact.

BUT website contact has taken all the time train up the platforms and add some other functions and thats what your really paying for.

Look for my videos spammed all over youtube about this in the coming months.

Hi, Is your service GSA as a service active? Where is the page to subscribe?

 

[proxygo]

i would have said scrapebox - but, there support has gone down hill

 

[Steptoe]

Considering Easy Contact Bot doesn't exist (it's domain redirects to a GSA affiliate url), Scrapebox wins here. There's still a huge gap in the market though for a Scrapebox alternative that you can parse/execute javascript with, to help scraping those pesky dynamically generated pages and submitting those forms behind WAFs.