My AI content dropped, google are destroying AI content ?

[zcldeapple]

纯垃圾 ai 使用老化域生成的内容排名......不是我的。

View attachment 200358

wther this site use links?thanks

 

[mdevo]

Would you please tell us the strength of the domain? I mean how many RD? The number of quality backlinks? Age of the domain? etc.

I guess number of backlinks or number of quality backlinks does not matter there since it is probably based on low comp keywords Sites like that can rank with literally 0 backlinks. Age of domain does not matter either.

 

[SOCOM]

Google can't detect AI generated content and that is a fact. Even if you don't proofread it and someone actually reported it, imo it does not matter at all. What caused the drop? Just a Google things. This algo can basically shut down entirely white hat site in one day and on the same day boost purely blackhatty scraped shit to the moon. Also, duplicate content does not matter (ye ik - if it is AI generated then it's not 100% or even 50% duplicate) if it meets user search intention you are totally fine. Of course - 100% duplicate content can lead you to burn, but ye, it can rank.

Source? Yandex is able to detect Jarvis content. I bet Google does too. "That is a fact" is a pretty bold claim.

 

[mdevo]

Source? Yandex is able to detect Jarvis content. I bet Google does too. "That is a fact" is a pretty bold claim.

Source: believe me

Yandex usually don't even give a fck about indexing english content, so w/e and they spend tons of resources trying to detect things like that instead of focusing on something that will make them as reliable as Google is for most of the users.

Google is still indexing scraped, duplicate, markov, translated content, so why would they be even able to detect Jarvis or another AI tool content? The thing is just to meet searcher intentions.

 

[SOCOM]

Source: believe me

Yandex usually don't even give a fck about indexing english content, so w/e and they spend tons of resources trying to detect things like that instead of focusing on something that will make them as reliable as Google is for most of the users.

Google is still indexing scraped, duplicate, markov, translated content, so why would they be even able to detect Jarvis or another AI tool content? The thing is just to meet searcher intentions.

Still indexing doesn't mean they can't detect it. Once again, your "that's a fact" is really just your opinion, "believe me".

 

[zcldeapple]

I think, is it because jarvis is used too many times, so let Google recognize the style and habits of articles written by jarvis? it is my guess

 

[Mesha86]

What about Quilbot content? We have to do it manually so is it safe to do Paraphraser? The latest update hits many sites using AI content

 

[MKSKS]

This has nothing to do with the AI content thing.
I say this because I have a network of sites with AI content.
There is something wrong with your process either it's the article optimization, or maybe on page issues.
Even crap/spun content ranks if its well optimized.

 

[Stitches and Burns]

Perhaps a human reviewer at Google took a look at your site, thought that it's AI garbage and proceeded to derank it?

 

[Kinu Actaz]

Google AI can detect writing style. There are other ways too because you use Gmail, Google AI can verify that you use jarvis by reading your emails. You use chrome browser, Google knows what sites you are spending your time on.
I’m not saying that Google is doing such things, but I have concerns that it is possible. So if you are saying that how can Google detect AI because it’s just a piece of text, you may be wrong.
You know Google is already using chrome’s (& other chromium based browsers such as Edge) data to detect whether your Core Web Vitals are okay or not.

 

[Roger Marquez]

What about Quilbot content? We have to do it manually so is it safe to do Paraphraser? The latest update hits many sites using AI content

It has absolutely nothing to do with AI-generated content and is more related to people thinking they can rank organically AI-generated content without doing any sort of proofreading, editing, or fact-checking before hitting the publish button.

AI writing tools are mere "assistants" and they are here to "assist" us with our content development process and NOT to replace humans.

 

[jorun]

Google can detect poor written content and/or spam sites, but not AI generated or assisted. If your content is of good quality, then Google cannot magically 'detect' AI.

 

[jorun]

Google AI can detect writing style. There are other ways too because you use Gmail, Google AI can verify that you use jarvis by reading your emails. You use chrome browser, Google knows what sites you are spending your time on.
I’m not saying that Google is doing such things, but I have concerns that it is possible. So if you are saying that how can Google detect AI because it’s just a piece of text, you may be wrong.
You know Google is already using chrome’s (& other chromium based browsers such as Edge) data to detect whether your Core Web Vitals are okay or not.

Chromium browsers collect anonymous data from users for real user Core Web Vitals insights, they disclose this in their agreement. I don't believe they collect data like whether you're using AI because you read an email about Jarvis, think they could be heavily fined if they did so, correct me if I'm wrong.

 

[Kinu Actaz]

Chromium browsers collect anonymous data from users for real user Core Web Vitals insights, they disclose this in their agreement. I don't believe they collect data like whether you're using AI because you read an email about Jarvis, think they could be heavily fined if they did so, correct me if I'm wrong.

A company that says it doesn’t collect data may collect data. Who knows?
They won’t tell us the reality.
They have been saying “Content is king” since the beginning of Google, but is it true?
Just an opinion, only God & Google knows the reality.