Proxy /IP Fraud Score

[folley]

Hello,

I'm looking for advice to find which tool give me the best view on my fingerprints on internet. I want to use proxy for creation of social media accounts.
I took proxy from well known old Residental provider into two tools :

1. pixelscan.net - no blacklisted IP, no spam activity , clean IP
2. pqualityscore.com - high fraud score , risk , proxy detection.

and both tools gave me different results as you can see in attachment. Which tool is more accurate? Or this provider is waste of time and I should go with different.

Thank you.
Best Regars.

 

[lucky.sparks]

both are different tools, you cant really compare them.

if ipqualityscore detects its with such high score, you should use different proxy.

 

[kryssluck]

My proxy has a risk score of 70, I'm using it for paypal. Should I change it? We need an expert's view.

 

[turelink]

My proxy has a risk score of 70, I'm using it for paypal. Should I change it? We need an expert's view.

No need to care about it, If working well, it's = 100, not works = 0...

 

[Deleted member 1552450]

Try https://2ip.io/privacy/

Not all ip check websites are accurate though.

 

[pattyponsy]

pixelscan.net claims that my browser fingerprints are inconsistent. Does anyone have any idea of how it's making that determination? I'm using multilogin.

 

[folley]

I don't want to talk about browsers(antidetect) and their setup. This is different chapter which you can easily bypass. Trying to figure out which tool is the accurate for fraud score. I would like to create social media accounts and gmails in right way. Determite if IP have good score you can easily try to create facebook account , instagram or twitter.
If Facebook allows you create account without ask for Phone verification for 30days then your IP was ok for them. The same for Instagram. Twiiter also same similar algo. Create Twitter account without PV = good IP score and fngerprints.

It's not rocket science to create gmail even on risk score IP. From time after time you can get disabled account. It isn't often. (rare). I wanted to figure out that different tool show different results and trying to find out which is more accurate. Another thing is warming, cookies - which show that it plays also role.

 

[folley]

Try https://2ip.io/privacy/

Not all ip check websites are accurate though.

Thank you.

Another ones:
scamalytics.com
ip-lookup.org

 

[Deleted member 658642]

I would like to create social media accounts and gmails in right way. Determite if IP have good score you can easily try to create facebook account , instagram or twitter.

That’s not the intended purpose of estimating an IP’s fraud score.

 

[ristoriel]

You can't really tell if a proxy provider has fraud IPs from web tools. However, if you're thinking of trying out mobile proxies, you can do a preliminary screening using https://whatismyipaddress.com/ True, dedicated mobile IPs connect to real network towers. So if results in whatismyip has that field (AT&T, Verizon etc.) chances are, the IPs are authentic mobile proxies. This is one way of testing but once again, there's no "one tool does all" kind of guarantee here.

 

[lindango]

Hello,

I'm looking for advice to find which tool give me the best view on my fingerprints on internet. I want to use proxy for creation of social media accounts.
I took proxy from well known old Residental provider into two tools :

1. pixelscan.net - no blacklisted IP, no spam activity , clean IP
2. pqualityscore.com - high fraud score , risk , proxy detection.

View attachment 199340
View attachment 199339View attachment 199340

and both tools gave me different results as you can see in attachment. Which tool is more accurate? Or this provider is waste of time and I should go with different.

Thank you.
Best Regars.

Have you checked with IP Fighter yet?

 

[Skulldugger]

Scamanalytics for instance, but to he honest I do not trust any of this services, because the information you see will be different on each resource so that makes me believe that this isn't the method of checking "purity" of proxies