Share Your Experiences With AI Content - I Think It's Outstanding.

[FlyFlay]

I am just BLOWN away from the quality of the content Jarvis can produce. It is just clicking buttons and creating context for a few minutes and you creates a FU***** masterpiece, i don't even overestimate that.

I am an expert in my niche, and I think the content is sufficient.

Share your experience with AI content and how well it writes, on all platforms but I believe Jarvis is the most fluent.

 

[BravoFoxtrot]

I have used Jarvis earlier & Now I'm using Rytr from past 2 Months and It's pretty good for the price . They have improved a lot since their launch.

 

[FlyFlay]

I have used Jarvis earlier & Now I'm using Rytr from past 2 Months and It's pretty good for the price . They have improved a lot since their launch.

You think they are comparable?

 

[Kostaban]

I have used Jarvis earlier & Now I'm using Rytr from past 2 Months and It's pretty good for the price . They have improved a lot since their launch.

Same: The price is really great. But what about the quality content competitive with Jarvis? Thanks!

 

[FlyFlay]

Same: The price is really great. But what about the quality content competitive with Jarvis? Thanks!

I believe Jarvis is by far the product which is easiest to use, i think over the quality at itself, the flow of usage is a barrier in the other competitors

Quality of the outpost can be disputed though
Haven't tried many because the interface is just too repelling

 

[m13ur13]

I am just BLOWN away from the quality of the content Jarvis can produce. It is just clicking buttons and creating context for a few minutes and you creates a FU***** masterpiece, i don't even overestimate that.

I am an expert in my niche, and I think the content is sufficient.

Share your experience with AI content and how well it writes, on all platforms but I believe Jarvis is the most fluent.

I agree.

 

[Deleted member 1247054]

Jarvis is shit for long writing just did A test right now

 

[spectrejoe]

Jarvis is shit for long writing just did A test right now

Disagree, my main site making xxxx$/m is entirely written with long-form Jarvis articles

 

[Deleted member 1247054]

So in french it's shit, I can't even understand the content, or maybe I'm doing something wrong

 

[Kostaban]

Jarvis is shit for long writing just did A test right now

What about Rytr? Just generated an article. Overall not so bad for AI but it's not enough credits to fully estimate a quality with their free account. Don't think it will be better than Jarvis though.

 

[MKSKS]

Jarvis can be useless for someone & usefull for others.
It all depends on how much time you spend to learn it.
Initially when I heard of it about an year ago gave it a try it was useless for me.
I couldn't generate a decent copy of blog post.
But then when I watched all the stuff available on YouTube & tried experimenting got some good results.
I have always found it useful since then.
Generated a hell lot of content mostly for link building & site filler.
Now since few days I have been using some other tools & they are I would say decent too.
I am excited about those which promise long form content by just inputting the topic, going to try them soon.
Personally I feel Jarvis has a better trained AI so it's quality is better.

BTW: Be it Jarvis or anything else, nothing beats a quality writer.

These tools are good but to beat actual human writers they need to improve a lot.

 

[biz]

Is either of them useful for a money site? What topics did you try out?

 

[MrDigi]

I dont think its really good enough to make content with ai, because its really hard to rank with those articles which provides by ai.
So I think you must make quality content from writers.

 

[Megaverse]

I dont think its really good enough to make content with ai, because its really hard to rank with those articles which provides by ai.
So I think you must make quality content from writers.

How do you know it's hard to rank ai generated content?

 

[MrDigi]

How do you know it's hard to rank ai generated content?

I done it before, with an wordpress website! If they rank they dont appear for long time.

 

[GivingWork]

They use GPT-3 right?

 

[rideronjourney]

I done it before, with an wordpress website! If they rank they dont appear for long time.

did you use content generated by Jarvis on a Wordpress website? or you used a Wordpress automatic content generation plugin for content?

 

[FromAfrica]

Am using wordhero and am ok with

Just learn the basic or advance how to use AI then you are good to go

But first you most be good in your Niche

To my AI is just an assistant, it still need human intelligence to product better end result

 

[adonthenet]

Jarvis a noobs tool compared to my in house ai jk good luck with it it’s nice and all…

 

[AdSensei]

Used jarvis but still needed human touch, so for me it was 75% jarvis (or jasper) and 25% human touch.