So Let Me Get This Straight

[TashaJ]

10:1 is common sense of interpreting vaccine efficiency (>90% in general) vs resistance in an unimmuned human organism which is 100% of the population pre pandemic since it's a novel virus never encountered by anyone's immune system. Statistics are a dynamic variable and we are yet to see some that fully reflect the real situation, in some years perhaps, what we've got at the current stage is what we've got at all, but it's an approximation of the real value and it will go closer and closer as the sample and the studies evolve.

But I guess i was overestimating your ability to think by merely pointing to a stats tracker (second link has a graph you need to see and understand) and expecting you to get my point. I apologize.

I see your now resulting to insults.
Sounds to me that you have accepted that you can't explain and prove your point.
GG.

 

[redjebo]

I see your now resulting to insults.
Sounds to me that you have accepted that you can't explain and prove your point.
GG.

Why insults, I'm just stating the obvious.
And the proof is up there in my posts if you care to read.
Really can't say if serious or just trolling at this point.

 

[TashaJ]

Why insults, I'm just stating the obvious.
And the proof is up there in my posts if you care to read.
Really can't say if serious or just trolling at this point.

Your proof isn't proof. You claim I post unsubstantial links when infact it was bartos links.
I make a direct quote from that link and you think its me making the point.
Then you post some links, and the claims you make aren't in the link.
Nor is what you say relevant to what I initially said to barto.
Then you repeat the same thing again without any evidence or reason why you are posting it.

Well done. You know 10:1 means 90%. I don't know what that has to do with bartos original point that non vacced carry thousands times the virus to vaccinated.

 

[DediRock]

The only vaccine I would do is the J&J. It's closer to a traditional vaccine, not the RNA stuff.