Which link would you take

absolutely 100% site #2 every day, twice on sundays!

relevancy is BS. I got a link from a sports site that has nothing to do with my business, and it has done wonders, because the site has huge amount of traffic (think ESPN!). I have also gotten link from related business sites, that do not have anywhere close to that sports site and result were so so.

again, relevancy is BS, traffic is king from google's eyes.

you are saying guest post, so even though site #2 is not related to your site, your guest is related. this is similar to my case.
 
Last edited:
absolutely 100% site #2 every day, twice on sundays!

relevancy is BS. I got a link from a sports site that has nothing to do with my business, and it has done wonders, because the site has huge amount of traffic (think ESPN!). I have also gotten link from related business sites, that do not have anywhere close to that sports site and result were so so.

again, relevancy is BS, traffic is king from google's eyes.

you are saying guest post, so even though site #2 is not related to your site, your guest is related. this is similar to my case.
Yes thats why i said its guest post.
 
it is a no brainer then. option #2.

please do let us know the impact of either option when you go through with them.
Am not going with any, this is just hypothetical, to see everybody's opinion on relevancy vs authority. I just wanna know what you all think on that topic
 
I would choose Site 1 since it's relevant to your site, and on page 1. So your traffic will be intent to your site.
 
Why ?
Do you think link itself is more powerful because its kinda more relevant, or because of potential traffic you might get since Site 1 is ranked for some of those keywords ?
Remember the DR is a third.party metric :)
While if a site get high traffic, it means it's appreciated by google itself.
Site 1 no doubt in this case.
 
Remember the DR is a third.party metric :)
While if a site get high traffic, it means it's appreciated by google itself.
Site 1 no doubt in this case.
True about the metrics and traffic and site 2 has 2 million hits traffic compared to site 1 which has 40k so I don't get your logic for Site 1?
 
damn, that's a tough one. I'd pick site 2, though for the extra authority and traffic. I know that the traffic might be unrelated to your niche, but then again, it's a generic niche so some of that traffic might be interested in your niche at any time. And since the price is the same for both websites the double authority might make the difference
My thoughts exactly!

Option 2 here
 
#2
They both generic, which means they are both diverse in a range of content.
So your niche could be the first of many to come.

Thats almost like saying, would you have a DR50 niche related link or a link from the BBC...
BBC.
Well, who wouldn't want a BBC ;)
 
If site 2 is a newspaper or a renowned magazine and the link is a contextual do follow, I’d go with that. Otherwise I’d choose site #1.

But I’d probably get both, maybe not at the same time.
 
I would think well of site 2, if the whole site is about games, for example, and I want a health article, I would go with option 1.

If #2 isn’t too aggressive and if it doesn’t look like "too much", I’d go with option 2.
Fully agree with this.

If Google gives them 2 million visitors a month, then they must like them. For now. It's always good to be seen with the people (websites) that Google favor.
 
Back
Top