Just Invested a good amount in this

[SocialManager]

Remember that those tokens being staked had to be sold to their respective owners in the first place. Nafter has 1 year to give you 100% back in returns on their lower tier and 200% on the highest tier while managing the first NFT social network and investing hard on all social media and influencers.

NAFT tokens are not only for staking, they are used to purchase NFTs too.

I am not sure what you think your point is. Yes, people bought the tokens, and? Who cares about the timeline? Tokens can be withdrawn and sold ANY TIME. There is NO locking which means that people are getting tons of "free" money and they are only here for that staking which is incredibly high and extremely low risk. The people who are staking their tokens are probably not going to buy any NFTs with those tokens. They are probably completely different audiences.

How do I buy? Can I buy with binance?

No. You need a wallet with BNB to buy on Pancake Swap or sign up for an account on Gate.io exchange. If you are new to crypto, you should join Telegram to get support from mods directly who can walk you through it.

 

[Kambaggo]

They launched the platform without the ability to use their own token. The functionality will be added this Friday, but they plan to keep the ability to buy in ETH and BNB. Buying with the NAFT token will save you 5% in fees. The fees are used to "buy back and burn" tokens, so they do plan to burn tokens on a regular basis. Actually 400 Million is a relatively small supply though.

The team do appear quite sketchy to me. The CEO and Marketing Director especially just come off as really sketchy.

When you start to ask questions about money in the Telegram, you will get banned. Not allowed to do research because it is labelled as FUD.

The Marketing Director keeps telling everyone he has amazing connections and that everyone will be shocked by his connections.

Then he announces Jake Paul partnership, and everyone is like WOW amazing connections. But everyone ignores that Jake Paul will shill anything for money for anyone. It doesn't take connections to get Jake Paul to shill for you.

View attachment 186988

A year ago he talked about DOGE, then he talked about SAFEMOON, then he talked about YUMMY.

Now NAFTER can join that list... OK guys. Lets be serious here. This guy has no morals, and only cares about the size of the check you write him.

So how much did Nafter pay him? We will never know. If they paid him in tokens, everyone should be worried about when he will dump them.

Even his upcoming auction will be paid in NAFT tokens, and I suspect the platform will pay him using shill bidding if the price doesn't naturally get high enough, because they want to make headlines. Anything less than $100,000 would be a huge failure for the company. Then we can expect Jake Paul to dump those tokens on the market, and we can expect people who bought at $0.05 to take their profits, and the price will be back where it was before Jake Paul came around.

This should be good for a quick profit, but I do not plan to stick around long term. What I have seen from them so far scares me.

Thanks.

They launched the platform without the ability to use their own token. The functionality will be added this Friday, but they plan to keep the ability to buy in ETH and BNB. Buying with the NAFT token will save you 5% in fees. The fees are used to "buy back and burn" tokens, so they do plan to burn tokens on a regular basis. Actually 400 Million is a relatively small supply though.

The team do appear quite sketchy to me. The CEO and Marketing Director especially just come off as really sketchy.

When you start to ask questions about money in the Telegram, you will get banned. Not allowed to do research because it is labelled as FUD.

The Marketing Director keeps telling everyone he has amazing connections and that everyone will be shocked by his connections.

Then he announces Jake Paul partnership, and everyone is like WOW amazing connections. But everyone ignores that Jake Paul will shill anything for money for anyone. It doesn't take connections to get Jake Paul to shill for you.

View attachment 186988

A year ago he talked about DOGE, then he talked about SAFEMOON, then he talked about YUMMY.

Now NAFTER can join that list... OK guys. Lets be serious here. This guy has no morals, and only cares about the size of the check you write him.

So how much did Nafter pay him? We will never know. If they paid him in tokens, everyone should be worried about when he will dump them.

Even his upcoming auction will be paid in NAFT tokens, and I suspect the platform will pay him using shill bidding if the price doesn't naturally get high enough, because they want to make headlines. Anything less than $100,000 would be a huge failure for the company. Then we can expect Jake Paul to dump those tokens on the market, and we can expect people who bought at $0.05 to take their profits, and the price will be back where it was before Jake Paul came around.

This should be good for a quick profit, but I do not plan to stick around long term. What I have seen from them so far scares me.

Thanks!

A lot of red flags here and it confirms a lot of my suspicion.

Price is around 8 cents now and it seems to be in a downward trend.

Might wait a bit for it to drop, then buy and wait for the Jake Paul thing (no clue who he is tbh) and then jump ship.

 

[Rowdy Devil]

They are NOT just starting marketing. This is simply not correct. They are currently spending around $2 MILLION per month on staking pools which is part of their marketing budget. They have already spent a few hundred thousand on other influencers. They can't keep refilling the staking pools indefinitely. So the question is what happens when 400 MILLION tokens are no longer staked? The price plummets. They are hoping those people will stake to creator profiles, but it's not likely to be attractive enough. The price will likely jump to $0.18 - $0.22 on Jake Paul NFT, and from there it will go back to settle around $0.08 to $0.11 depending on what else they announce.

So the biggest question everyone SHOULD have right now is when does the team stop filling staking pools? And how much money are they currently spending on everything? How much money do they need to raise from token sales in the next 4 weeks? But of course, this is crypto, and 99% of people have no idea what they are doing, and so they just post blatantly incorrect information.

jake paul is one of many .. so its not like after jake paul thing it will crash.. second its a partnership not like paid and post only one nft.. u will see multiple nft from his side and from other celebrities ..

 

[RottenApple]

Nafter is NOT a free speech platform. They can and WILL ban fake profiles, as they should. It is a horrible look when people buy an NFT thinking they are simping for a girl and find out its just some dude who ripped a picture off Google.

This is not about faking a profile. I am talking about freedom of minting your NFT. NFTs belong to the person who minted them and eventually to the person that purchase them. So not sure where the fake profile equation comes into play as it won't matter.

If you want to make sure your favorite model is the one selling you their NFT, purchase it from their verified profile.

I am not sure what you think your point is. Yes, people bought the tokens, and? Who cares about the timeline? Tokens can be withdrawn and sold ANY TIME. There is NO locking which means that people are getting tons of "free" money and they are only here for that staking which is incredibly high and extremely low risk. The people who are staking their tokens are probably not going to buy any NFTs with those tokens. They are probably completely different audiences.

Chill bro. I am not trying to convince you to join.

My point is simple. Nafter made tons of $$$ from their token sales which is being used to market the platform. They can keep their staking pools forever as they are making more than 100% per year on your staked money. Why would you all of the sudden withdraw your money and sell your tokens? If you were interested in their APY from the beginning? You can do it, it doesn't mean everyone will.

Creators will prefer to obtain NAFT in exchange for their NFTs as it has higher short-term growth potential compared to BNB and ETH.

Whatever, I am into my money and these guys look to have their fundamentals right.

 

[Nw_Work]

I feel bad for people asking is it late to invest

well, to be specific, for their brains

is it too late?

 

[SocialManager]

jake paul is one of many .. so its not like after jake paul thing it will crash.. second its a partnership not like paid and post only one nft.. u will see multiple nft from his side and from other celebrities ..

It's a PAID partnership. It means they PAY him to be a "partner." They literally released a press release stating that it's a paid partnership. How many NFTs will you see from his side? How much will he promote it? What are the details of the partnership? Why so secretive if everything is legit? Do you think the details of this partnership are not important?

Chill bro. I am not trying to convince you to join.

My point is simple. Nafter made tons of $$$ from their token sales which is being used to market the platform. They can keep their staking pools forever as they are making more than 100% per year on your staked money. Why would you all of the sudden withdraw your money and sell your tokens? If you were interested in their APY from the beginning? You can do it, it doesn't mean everyone will.

Creators will prefer to obtain NAFT in exchange for their NFTs as it has higher short-term growth potential compared to BNB and ETH.

Whatever, I am into my money and these guys look to have their fundamentals right.

OMG dude you can't be serious here. I hope you are just trolling right now and Nafter is paying you to do this.

They make money from their token sales, yes, but people have to keep buying them. They have a limited supply of tokens to sell. That's how they pay salaries and marketing. Do you have any idea how much money they are spending in total each month and how many tokens they have already sold? They are ABSOLUTELY NOT making 100% per year on your staked money. That is why the staking fees come from the MARKETING budget, it is a MARKETING expense. I am just blown away that you think they are making more than 100% on staked tokens, like, where did you come up with this idea? How can you possibly think they are making more than 100% per year on staked tokens?!?!?! Nobody will have to withdraw their tokens, THE STAKING WILL END. They can't afford to keep doing staking!

I can't take you seriously man. You didn't read or understand anything I wrote. You actually think Nafter has found the secret to infinite money and can make 100%+ APY per year at this stage.

How can you say they look to have their fundamentals when you didn't even understand that STAKING is part of MARKETING budget?!

 

[Nw_Work]

It's a PAID partnership. It means they PAY him to be a "partner." They literally released a press release stating that it's a paid partnership. How many NFTs will you see from his side? How much will he promote it? What are the details of the partnership? Why so secretive if everything is legit? Do you think the details of this partnership are not important?



OMG dude you can't be serious here. I hope you are just trolling right now and Nafter is paying you to do this.

They make money from their token sales, yes, but people have to keep buying them. They have a limited supply of tokens to sell. That's how they pay salaries and marketing. Do you have any idea how much money they are spending in total each month and how many tokens they have already sold? They are ABSOLUTELY NOT making 100% per year on your staked money. That is why the staking fees come from the MARKETING budget, it is a MARKETING expense. I am just blown away that you think they are making more than 100% on staked tokens, like, where did you come up with this idea? How can you possibly think they are making more than 100% per year on staked tokens?!?!?! Nobody will have to withdraw their tokens, THE STAKING WILL END. They can't afford to keep doing staking!

I can't take you seriously man. You didn't read or understand anything I wrote. You actually think Nafter has found the secret to infinite money and can make 100%+ APY per year at this stage.

How can you say they look to have their fundamentals when you didn't even understand that STAKING is part of MARKETING budget?!

Let's simplify it dude is it Investable to gain even 10-50% on your outlook within this year or by next year sept on whatever value invested now at $0.088490?

 

[Kambaggo]

Price action looking good, might be able to snap some up at 5 cents.

 

[Nw_Work]

Price action looking good, might be able to snap some up at 5 cents.

What can be done at this level is a long wait according to my opinion as it looks like a lot of people have dumped into market their initial coins since price has been on downward trend at around 0.03 but once this gets listed on exchanges there will be at least 10% increase for sure but might be short lived and then regain and continue to climb

 

[RottenApple]

That's how they pay salaries and marketing.

Ohh I see! Nice to have such confidential information available

Do you have any idea how much money they are spending in total each month

Do you? Please attach your source over here.

They are ABSOLUTELY NOT making 100% per year on your staked money.

How do you know? Do you know all their sources of income? Maybe the numbers are blinding you.

If they generate $1,000,000 revenue clean a year (BNB, ETH, NAFT sales, Minting, Sales Comissions, Anyway!) and they have $100,000 staked in their pools. Are they on the negative? This is an example cuz I am almost certain you will try to go literal.

Yeah, you will say they are not making more than the amount staked, ok prove it please.

That is why the staking fees come from the MARKETING budget, it is a MARKETING expense.

You should be a really good friend of Wayne lol

Sorry. Your credibility score just reached 0.

Dude again, whatever... that's ok if you don't like it. I will go on with my real life peace V

 

[SocialManager]

If they generate $1,000,000 revenue clean a year (BNB, ETH, NAFT sales, Minting, Sales Comissions, Anyway!) and they have $100,000 staked in their pools. Are they on the negative? This is an example cuz I am almost certain you will try to go literal.

Yeah, you will say they are not making more than the amount staked, ok prove it please.

You should be a really good friend of Wayne lol

Sorry. Your credibility score just reached 0.

Dude again, whatever... that's ok if you don't like it. I will go on with my real life peace V

It's not PROFIT to sell TOKENS. They have an extremely limited supply of tokens. They don't make money from minting, minting COSTS them money through increased server fees. They don't have a REVENUE GENERATING STRATEGY. None. The BNB/ETH sales go to BUY BACK AND BURN. They DO NOT KEEP THAT. Their entire business model relies on the price of the coin going up fast enough so they can sell less of it each month. Like, did you even look into Nafter at all? How could you not know these basic facts? The most they can do is keep reducing the APY until it is so low that it would not be attractive to 90% of users.

Again, I want to make this crystal clear: Nafter has NO LONG TERM REVENUE GENERATING SCHEMES. They can only sell their tokens on the market, which drives down the price. Once those tokens run out, they have no other way to generate revenue.

Let's simplify it dude is it Investable to gain even 10-50% on your outlook within this year or by next year sept on whatever value invested now at $0.088490?

It's tough. We seriously have no clue how much the team is spending, when they plan to dump more tokens on the market, how much they gave Jake Paul who may dump on the market, when they will stop filling the staking or lower the APY, etc. It's a big risk. The token rose to $0.40 on initial trading and dropped all the way to $0.02. The token pumped to $0.20 and then dropped again to $0.03. I think it's probably a good investment for the next 3 days, and if they announce a new CEX, add another few days onto that. I do not think it's a good investment for the next 6 months or 12 months. They have just spent too much money trying to keep the price up and burned through money too fast with not a single revenue-generating scheme beyond dumping tokens onto the market.

 

[SmmFlix]

How does it work, where did you invested?

 

[Rowdy Devil]

How does it work, where did you invested?

Where to buy $NAFT

PancakeSwap: https://exchange.pancakeswap.finance/#/swap?inputCurrency=0xd7730681b1dc8f6f969166b29d8a5ea8568616a3

Gate: https://www.gate.io/en/trade/NAFT_USDT

Decoin: https://www.decoin.io/en/trade/NAFT-USDT

Bilaxy: https://bilaxy.com/trade/NAFT_BNB

 

[Nw_Work]

Where to buy $NAFT

PancakeSwap: https://exchange.pancakeswap.finance/#/swap?inputCurrency=0xd7730681b1dc8f6f969166b29d8a5ea8568616a3

Gate: https://www.gate.io/en/trade/NAFT_USDT

Decoin: https://www.decoin.io/en/trade/NAFT-USDT

Bilaxy: https://bilaxy.com/trade/NAFT_BNB

At what price did u enter?

 

[Rowdy Devil]

At what price did u enter?

at first i entered @.14 then later because of dca now its .7

 

[RottenApple]

It's not PROFIT to sell TOKENS. They have an extremely limited supply of tokens. They don't make money from minting, minting COSTS them money through increased server fees. They don't have a REVENUE GENERATING STRATEGY. None. The BNB/ETH sales go to BUY BACK AND BURN. They DO NOT KEEP THAT. Their entire business model relies on the price of the coin going up fast enough so they can sell less of it each month. Like, did you even look into Nafter at all? How could you not know these basic facts? The most they can do is keep reducing the APY until it is so low that it would not be attractive to 90% of users.

Again, I want to make this crystal clear: Nafter has NO LONG TERM REVENUE GENERATING SCHEMES. They can only sell their tokens on the market, which drives down the price. Once those tokens run out, they have no other way to generate revenue.

I get it now! They pioneered this platform in the NFT industry, managed to partner with the main influencers in social media, are burning their coin, to pump their coin which was not used to purchase their NFTs in the first place and then sell everything and run to the Bahamas! Without any other means to generate revenue! You are right! I will sell all my coins ASAP!!

 

[Rowdy Devil]

I get it now! They pioneered this platform in the NFT industry, managed to partner with the main influencers in social media, are burning their coin, to pump their coin which was not used to purchase their NFTs in the first place and then sell everything and run to the Bahamas! Without any other means to generate revenue! You are right! I will sell all my coins ASAP!!

View attachment 187073

must propably he has been banned from that group for FUD and now he is showing his anger here.

 

[SocialManager]

I get it now! They pioneered this platform in the NFT industry, managed to partner with the main influencers in social media, are burning their coin, to pump their coin which was not used to purchase their NFTs in the first place and then sell everything and run to the Bahamas! Without any other means to generate revenue! You are right! I will sell all my coins ASAP!!

When you can't argue with facts, just troll! This is a classic sign that you have invested in a shitcoin and you are worried everyone else is starting to realize it.

They didn't "pioneer" a platform. It's an NFT marketplace with commenting.
Anyone can "manage" to partner with influencers. You literally just DM them and ask how much.
Burning their TOKEN (it's not a coin) is a marketing gimmick to keep the price up.
Pumping tokens is done by whales, not the team. Whales get rich while people like you lose money.

Tell you what, you can shut my mouth by telling me what you think their revenue-generating stream is.

You do know they are not doing this for charity, right? They are being paid and they have tokens they can dump on the market to get rich.
This isn't a passion project of theirs. It's just a money grab.

But as I said, go on, tell me what you think they can do to generate revenue.

Selling a limited asset is not considered a revenue-generating stream in business. They are in the business of NFTs, not token sales.

 

[RottenApple]

Do you? Please attach your source over here.

Yeah, you will say they are not making more than the amount staked, ok prove it please.

When you can't argue with facts, just troll!

I am waiting for YOU! Hahah!

Their entire business model relies on the price of the coin going up fast enough so they can sell less of it each month.

Burning their TOKEN (it's not a coin) is a marketing gimmick to keep the price up.

Coin or Token? Please organize your thoughts.

They can only sell their tokens on the market, which drives down the price.

They are in the business of NFTs, not token sales.

Damn man, you are all over the place.

I was going to go on but it's not worth my time. We are lucky to have someone with so much insight and access to so much non publicly available information like you on BHW.

Look:

You won!!!
​

Now be happy and go on with your life. I will do the same with mine.

Your next replies will be left on seen.

 

[SocialManager]

I am waiting for YOU! Hahah!

Coin or Token? Please organize your thoughts.

Damn man, you are all over the place.

I was going to go on but it's not worth my time. We are lucky to have someone with so much insight and access to so much non publicly available information like you on BHW.

Yes, I made an error after reading your posts in calling it a coin.

We already know there possible revenue streams: Commissions or fees on selling NFTs. That's where they are SUPPOSED to generate revenue.

However, they decided NOT to generate revenue, and instead do a buy back and burn.

There is no other revenue stream they have ever suggested.

You are asking me to prove a negative.