( LinkBuilding 2021) Does this method work?

bb802123

Registered Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2021
Messages
57
Reaction score
9
Hey guys, I am trying different linkbuilding strategy. At this moment, I decide to try doing backlinks in the following way:

Goal: Increase the ranking position of a keyword that has mid-competition.

Firstly, build Tier 1 links which contain high quality original contents that point to the URL that contains that keyword. WIthin 50 Tier 1 links will be created.
Secondly, build Tier 2 links by using RankerX which point to Tier 1 guest blogs. Around 2000 Tier 2 links will be generated.
Thirdly, build Tier 3 and Tier 4 links. Thousands of them.

Will it take effects? Because I have seen that my competitors are working well with this strategy (Just guessing, probably they are using this method...)
 
Mate, this is the normal strategy that SEO focus on.
Building tier links helps to make links look natural.
But doing this all at a time, looks spammy and intentional.
By doing this process by getting high quality Guest posts and High DA PBN as tier 1 and directing manual submissions, cheap PBn's(spun and spun edit) as tier 2 and social shares for next tiers at reular interval or drip feeding links, helps you acquire good traffic and referral and ranking.
For better ranking focus on Low competitive keyword on your niche.
Good luck!!
 
Mate, this is the normal strategy that SEO focus on.
Building tier links helps to make links look natural.
But doing this all at a time, looks spammy and intentional.
By doing this process by getting high quality Guest posts and High DA PBN as tier 1 and directing manual submissions, cheap PBn's(spun and spun edit) as tier 2 and social shares for next tiers at reular interval or drip feeding links, helps you acquire good traffic and referral and ranking.
For better ranking focus on Low competitive keyword on your niche.
Good luck!!
The problem is how many links for tier 1, tier 2, tier 3, etc?
Apart from that, what will be the drip feed schedule for tier 2, tier 3, tier 4 links?
 
This is regular blackhat SEO strategy applied by many people here. You don't need Tier-4 unless you can't index Tier-3 links. You should submit your Tier-3 links to a paid indexer instead of creating another tier. Once they push link juice, they'll power up your Tier-1 and rank your site.
 
Definitely will have an impact on ranking, as you said, people doing that and its work. Not my way of building organic traffic, so when you do please inform us.
 
This is regular blackhat SEO strategy applied by many people here. You don't need Tier-4 unless you can't index Tier-3 links. You should submit your Tier-3 links to a paid indexer instead of creating another tier. Once they push link juice, they'll power up your Tier-1 and rank your site.
Agree with you point. But how about the amount to links and the duration for drip feed? Is there a rule or common practice for this?
 
A guy who makes at least a million dollars in profit per year told me that SEO is not complicated.

He said just focus on building high quality T1 backlinks and make sure the sites linking to you have real traffic and I mean real organic traffic, not botted traffic.

You dont have to waste time on T2, T3 blast.
 
A guy who makes at least a million dollars in profit per year told me that SEO is not complicated.

He said just focus on building high quality T1 backlinks and make sure the sites linking to you have real traffic and I mean real organic traffic, not botted traffic.

You dont have to waste time on T2, T3 blast.
Does he mean the domain or the url has real traffic?
 
Does he mean the domain or the url has real traffic?
Sorry I forgot to add another important info.

The main domain itself is good enough so you have to ensure the high traffic site place your website link on their homepage.

In other words the blog post which have your website link on it has to appear on their homepage.
 
Sorry I forgot to add another important info.

The main domain itself is good enough so you have to ensure the high traffic site place your website link on their homepage.

In other words the blog post which have your website link on it has to appear on their homepage.
good luck getting your (unknown) blog on the homepage of a high traffic website like CNN.com or BusinessInsider.

Yeah, we all know that this works, but this is reserved to people like that friend of yours that makes millions per year. If I had even 10% of his income I'd be as fucking confident and expert as him and give advices left and right.

But how can mere mortal SEOers get a chunk of the traffic and money without having to sell their own house and families? That's what I'd like to know
 
Agree with you point. But how about the amount to links and the duration for drip feed? Is there a rule or common practice for this?
There is no thumbrule for dripfeed. The general practice is to maintain link velocity. If you're building 50 T-1 links this month, you should at least create 50 T-1 links next month to maintain link velocity. For dripfeed, you should keep T-1 links within 50-200/month. It may raise suspicion if you create more than 200 links in the beginning but you can create more links over time.
 
good luck getting your (unknown) blog on the homepage of a high traffic website like CNN.com or BusinessInsider.

Yeah, we all know that this works, but this is reserved to people like that friend of yours that makes millions per year. If I had even 10% of his income I'd be as fucking confident and expert as him and give advices left and right.

But how can mere mortal SEOers get a chunk of the traffic and money without having to sell their own house and families? That's what I'd like to know

My goodness, CNN and Business Insider is not the only type of high traffic sites that exist.

In fact, getting links from such "general" sites is not going to help you improve SERP especially if your site is new.
 
My goodness, CNN and Business Insider is not the only type of high traffic sites that exist.

In fact, getting links from such "general" sites is not going to help you improve SERP especially if your site is new.
yes, but even those lesser websites will not rush to put your backlink on their homepage when they can get paid $100s per month to promote established businesses instead. So, you either need to have deep pockets to pay for those homepage backlinks, or build your own PBN which will cost even more money, so...
 
Hey guys, I am trying different linkbuilding strategy. At this moment, I decide to try doing backlinks in the following way:

Goal: Increase the ranking position of a keyword that has mid-competition.

Firstly, build Tier 1 links which contain high quality original contents that point to the URL that contains that keyword. WIthin 50 Tier 1 links will be created.
Secondly, build Tier 2 links by using RankerX which point to Tier 1 guest blogs. Around 2000 Tier 2 links will be generated.
Thirdly, build Tier 3 and Tier 4 links. Thousands of them.

Will it take effects? Because I have seen that my competitors are working well with this strategy (Just guessing, probably they are using this method...)
 
yes, but even those lesser websites will not rush to put your backlink on their homepage when they can get paid $100s per month to promote established businesses instead. So, you either need to have deep pockets to pay for those homepage backlinks, or build your own PBN which will cost even more money, so...

Of course you need money to build high quality backlinks unless you have all the time to do manual outreach which is extremely time consuming and laborious yet no guarantee of producing positive results.
 
Of course you need money to build high quality backlinks
that's what I was addressing. And needing money is not the problem because everything costs money nowadays. But to rank for even medium competition keywords is helluva expensive, I'm not even mentioning the high competition keywords which are only reserved to hackers or billionaires.

I did keyword research by the book 1 month ago to find a keyword for one of my authority websites (in the education niche), and even though the website is clean (no spammy backlinks, no duplicate / plagiarized content, 1 year old domain too, etc) and the keyword research has been done - like I said - by the book, as soon as the article that I've written on the keyword that I found after extensive keyword research got indexed a week ago it's been lingering around pages 9-10 of the SERPs. And this is a keyword that had most untargeted pages in the top 10, most of those URLs have barely had any content on them as well, most of them also had no backlinks either, half of them have not even been topically-relevant websites (they've been quora, reddit, and 2 forums), etc.

So, I found this keyword that should have had a -100 keyword difficulty (yes, MINUS 100) by all of the rules of keyword research and yet, my high quality, authoritative website can't break into top 10 for the easiest keyword the world has ever seen, without a single backlink to that URL.

If this type of keyword can't rank without backlinks anymore, I don't even want to count the money needed to pay for backlinks to rank medium competition keywords. So, yes, of course you need money to build high quality backlinks, which is exactly what I was addressing.
 
There is no thumbrule for dripfeed. The general practice is to maintain link velocity. If you're building 50 T-1 links this month, you should at least create 50 T-1 links next month to maintain link velocity. For dripfeed, you should keep T-1 links within 50-200/month. It may raise suspicion if you create more than 200 links in the beginning but you can create more links over time.
But not sure if it is enough for only 200 T1 links because my site is a marketplace with thousands of products and hundreds of categories. In order to rank for those categories, only 200 T1 links to my money site's subfolders will simply not enough right?
 
Back
Top