Suggest the best Web 2.0 mass poster software.
- Thread starter Seo khan
- Start date
- Jan 23, 2015
- 5,624
- 11,287
Why not do it manually?
Not sure about software, especially one you need...
I guess you have already 100s of old ones, you want to add them to the software and let it do the thing.
Ranker does not have a good %, it creates a very small % of for example 100 web 2s, sometimes gets over 10.
I have my own system and I do it manually pretty quickly.
Not sure about software, especially one you need...
I guess you have already 100s of old ones, you want to add them to the software and let it do the thing.
Ranker does not have a good %, it creates a very small % of for example 100 web 2s, sometimes gets over 10.
I have my own system and I do it manually pretty quickly.
Seo khan
Regular Member
- Oct 1, 2017
- 280
- 89
How u are able to post manually and also quickly?
coz if there are 100,s of parasites then manual work is pretty time consuming.
Seo khan
Regular Member
- Oct 1, 2017
- 280
- 89
Have you any experice with MR
Yea manual is pretty time consuming. You can do semi automation but getting your own custom coded solution.
Royal96
Power Member
- Mar 16, 2019
- 683
- 376
Not so far, but from the software I know it was the first thing that came into my mind and is in lower price range when you go with subscription
- Jan 23, 2015
- 5,624
- 11,287
Yes, it is, but I will rather spend like 5 days and do [new ones] 100s than use Ranker.
I have a whole process, I'm not creating new ones to just spam it for backlinks.
If I have already old ones, the process is even faster...
Get the texts ready, copy/paste it, do some sorting it all out to look normal, I never post below 500 words, 2, 3, 4 pictures, a few more little things, I don't believe I spend more than 5 to 10 minutes per page.
Let’s say it’s even 10 minutes, that’s 10 pages in 1 hour and 40 minutes.
20 pages in 3 hours and 20 minutes, 40 pages in 6 hours and 40 minutes x 10 days = 400.
Of course, this is purely an example...
When we use Ranker, we can do it 5x or 10x times more and faster but I also put all my sites in a very awkward situation.
There’s probably some custom solution for this, as @Jimoz said:
I’ve never needed it so I’m fine for now and have no problem making them.
That is good idea for only people with hundreds of blogs.
- Sep 22, 2008
- 869
- 499
So far, rankerx is the only i know which can publish on previously created web2.
SEOap is also good choice, but i think you must create web2 with them, and then you can use those web2 to repost again and again.
SEOap is also good choice, but i think you must create web2 with them, and then you can use those web2 to repost again and again.