Conversation AI tool review

[ayonchy]

Hello,

Does anyone test this tool?

What is the update after publishing the article?

Do you get rank?

I have tested and got rank for some keywords.

What about you guys?

 

[Piss]

All these threads either are, or turn into, shillfests.

I am however interested in this also

 

[hideath]

yes, it works, and with all the bugs & problems that usually have, it's still much faster than handwriting,
it just doesn't work well for me when the subject is too specific and keep writing the same paragraphs

 

[bbrokeaf]

If you're using it for seo, not worth it. The content is mostly filler.

 

[ayonchy]

If you're using it for seo, not worth it. The content is mostly filler.

If you give more time and read full article. It can provide better output.

 

[ayonchy]

yes, it works, and with all the bugs & problems that usually have, it's still much faster than handwriting,
it just doesn't work well for me when the subject is too specific and keep writing the same paragraphs

Yes i also agree. Even for 4400 sv keyword I got 7 position within 2 hours after published

 

[akki1212]

Hello,

Does anyone test this tool?

What is the update after publishing the article?

Do you get rank?

I have tested and got rank for some keywords.

What about you guys?

Yeah don't use it for SEO. It's a nice tool to have if you find yourself running out of ideas for content. Jarvis will often give you great ideas, but you have to review them/switch words and phrases around before adding them to your copy.

 

[AmberJones]

B2B tech is made by Google so why would they hate it? Just have to review it to be a sensible article and you're good to go. It actually makes articles a lot better than Ezine's hahaha

 

[bbrokeaf]

B2B tech is made by Google so why would they hate it? Just have to review it to be a sensible article and you're good to go. It actually makes articles a lot better than Ezine's hahaha

Even if google doesn't hate it, your blog visitors will certainty hate it. It's very inaccurate for longtail keywords.

 

[AmberJones]

Even if google doesn't hate it, your blog visitors will certainty hate it. It's very inaccurate for longtail keywords.

like I said, you just have to put effort into it to make it a good one to readers the initial texts that it gives you will be your guide or blueprint and I'm talking to writers who are lazy or not that good or at the expert level.

 

[bbrokeaf]

like I said, you just have to put effort into it to make it a good one to readers the initial texts that it gives you will be your guide or blueprint and I'm talking to writers who are lazy or not that good or at the expert level.

I get that but, if you have to change 95% of a conversion ai article just to make it factually accurate, what's the point?

 

[AmberJones]

I get that but, if you have to change 95% of a conversion ai article just to make it factually accurate, what's the point?

bland writers wont have that vision like the elite ones so at least they have ideas on where they are going instead of starting from scratch then thinking about the next line then the next paragraph. Unless we're all like Shakespear or whatever

 

[bbrokeaf]

bland writers wont have that vision like the elite ones so at least they have ideas on where they are going instead of starting from scratch then thinking about the next line then the next paragraph. Unless we're all like Shakespear or whatever

So paying $99 a month just to use a small portion of the text provided is elite writer level?

 

[Ashton_Thow]

didnt get rank yet, but i think it will get rank soon.

 

[AmberJones]

So paying $99 a month just to use a small portion of the text provided is elite writer level?

you clearly didnt get what my point is do you LOL.....that fact that youve got so many ideas as a kickstart its a huge thing especially for non writer get it? And you dont really have to re write it 95%, yea only if you are that dumb, maybe but if you know what to do then its a big help.

 

[danno]

I've just tested the free trial. It's not going to churn out articles that rank all by itself, but I do think that it could be useful.

I wrote a 2000 word product review yesterday and probably about 1000 words of that were from Jarvis - the rest I wrote myself. The content Jarvis gave me was basic enough, heavily prompted by me, and factually incorrect a few times.

However, I got quite a few usable sentences too, and actually saved time on researching the product I was reviewing. I got a good usable introduction and conclusion as well, but the quality you get depends on the info you input yourself.

The review will rank but only because of content and SEO I did myself (I used Surfer as well) - Jarvis is not going to do the SEO for you.

It's not going to replace a human writer in my business, but I'm going to subscribe for a month to test it further as I think it'll be useful in saving me research time and giving me writing ideas that I just need to flesh out a bit more.

 

[WayneLeger]

is there any way to get conversionai at cheap price?