I will not be vaccinated!

[Nihilism]

I have no dog in this silly fight you all are having... my concern is that the rules are followed and name calling is not allowed per the terms of service.

As to vax, don.t vax, eat vax for breakfast... that is all on you "scientists".

i smoke my vax in a vaporizer

 

[SKS18]

Oh come on dude, you just get yourself magnetized after getting these nanobots shots, like the Mexicans tried to debunk the theory it and got the embarrassment of their lives in this video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/YhjMnTelsxVa/

No one ever thought about having powers like Magneto from X-Men?

 

[Nihilism]

I have no dog in this silly fight you all are having... my concern is that the rules are followed and name calling is not allowed per the terms of service.

As to vax, don.t vax, eat vax for breakfast... that is all on you "scientists".

Are BHW mods required to be vaccinated?

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

Are BHW mods required to be vaccinated?

Nothing in the Mod rules about that.

 

[patriotnews]

Oh come on dude, you just get yourself magnetized after getting these nanobots shots, like the Mexicans tried to debunk the theory it and got the embarrassment of their lives in this video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/YhjMnTelsxVa/

No one ever thought about having powers like Magneto from X-Men?

I am just sad my 5G reception hasn’t improved.
I don’t need to be able to stick spoons to me, unless I need quick armor when the Pfizer zombies attack! Ok, so maybe magnetic powers would be helpful…

 

[clock]

This thing has lasted longer than a Ceosam seo service

 

[Nihilism]

This thing has lasted longer than a Ceosam seo service

that's a big clock

 

[safeSEOboost]

I'm not a lab monkey.

just a monkey.

 

[Crazycam727]

No reputable virologists are being silenced off any platform.

so let me see if I have this correct: any fact that challenges your belief is because of a big pharma conspiracy, all your reputable sources are silenced by big tech in coordination with the big pharma conspiracy, so you have no reputable information you can share…
I find this interesting.

Not at all.

All I'm saying is that if you look for information on FB, YT, or any major news networks, you will find them all telling the same narrative.
Some of what they say makes sense, and I agree with.

But, you do have to question, why are doctors and virologists being shutdown and having their videos deleted, when they pose an alternative viewpoint? Wouldn't it just be easier to leave their videos on the platform? Afterall, freedom of speech is a thing.

I'd also like to make clear, the videos I am refferring to are available on bitchute etc, and the scientists don't say "Covid doesn't exist" , they aren't stupid.

They just present the same statistics and give their opinion on what the situation is.

The fact that the platforms ban them, is because they are trying to only tell one side of the story.

Which means, the public can only follow the mainstream media, and not make fully informed decisions.

 

[YungLue]

Not if actual regulations dictate them to distinguish and there's a possibility of a hefty fine, if failing to do so. Here vaccinated people (and those, who can prove by antibody test, they recovered from the illness) can go to places, where people without vaccination/protection certificate can't. They can go to bars, concerts, festivals, gyms or sports events, they are allowed to sit and eat inside restaurants, not just outside. These temporary rules will stay in place until the end of the summer.

You can look at this from different aspects. You can say, that it's discrimination or you can understand that giving these rights back to vaccinated people helps businesses to stay afloat.

This requires a higher level of vaccination for it to really work, which is above 50% here.

Probably this is the smartest move a government can do, to make people go and vaccinate. It works better than handing out money in my opinion.

You can speculate all you want. These types of regulations are against the human rights of people in any country, and if they were to fine anyone, it would immediately be thrown out the second it goes to a court. You can't force anyone to take a vaccine nor deny them access to essential services or jobs.

 

[jake lionar]

man this thread survived more than corona itself,
but to be honest OP Got some Good points there, but again i dont think anyone here cares

 

[Willyfish]

LMAO I just took a few hours to relax and smell flowers outside innocently and open my computer to see this thread which has now 5 more pages and is the first I saw on the homepage.

I will take a break from BHW for my mental health a few days I think

What makes me laugh a lot (even if I shouldn't) is that I imagine @BassTrackerBoats has to check this thread to see if there is not any rules violation as he surely has so more other shits to do. Being a mod here must not be a walk in the park

 

[rocknlight]

Dude do you believe in rockfeller conspiracy?

 

[adalbertmgrm]

Do you not understand that that IS the point? That people who's health is compromised have a WAY GREATER risk of death because of COVID? It's much more aggressive than the common flu, you're saying "thousands" of people die annually from COVID, but in the last year, 600,000 people have died from COVID or COVID RELATED illnesses, which you obviously don't understand the related illnesses are elder people and people with compromised immune systems, as well as totally healthy people. We are trying to prevent all their deaths, not just yours, if you even think you're healthy. You're essentially saying 'fuck you' to people who don't have the strength to fight it, that could be your grandparents or parents, or a brother or sister who has a severe disease which can alone kill them, then introduce a highly inflammatory and aggressive flu and they're done. You have 0 idea the severity of some cases, you are obviously in good health because you can sit here and say you don't want the vaccine, when tens of thousands of people are hoping retards just like you don't sneeze on their family or loved ones because they might die.

What you go on to say after that is even more retarded. You're saying people don't talk about lung cancer or any other disease, but you fail to realize the volume and scale of people dying from covid supersedes that, the amount of people who are already sick, old or weak immune system ARE DYING because of this disease, and it's not always big diseases that can kill you from COVID, you could have a really minor disease and end up having complications from COVID that kill you, and I'm telling you this from experience as a worker in the medical field AND vaccine researcher. You are 100% retarded. I'm not saying you should take the vaccine or not, that's up to you, but at least don't talk out of your uneducated ass about an actual problem that's really killing people, and is totally avoidable.

Whether it's a hoax or not, again, you're retarded, so I don't expect you to understand that it's obviously and definitely not a hoax, but if your argument would have been whether it was a bioweapon or not, I would understand your argument.

Your arguments are not conclusive, so your answers hang in the air as much as I do. So even in the worst case, the contents of our discussion are equal. It is unknown what those who died from Covid-19 actually died for. There is no data in this direction and it has not been scientifically investigated why they died, and there is no such research anywhere in the world. It was assumed that they died only from Covid-19 because they went to the hospital because of Covid-19 symptoms. But this is not really a scientific process. The diagnosis of the cause of death is made separately and specifically. (Maybe Covid-19 just played a triggering role.) It is also surprising that all those who died in the face of such a dangerous epidemic are in the hospital and there are no deaths at home.

We may not be doctors, but that doesn't mean we can't understand the contradictions. We may not be doctors, but we can explore some reasonable doubts and contradictions. You say that I sacrifice old and frail people. Elderly and frail people are thus helpless not only against Covid-19, but in the face of many diseases. This is not a law of nature written by me. According to your logic, we should declare a pandemic forever to protect the old and weak people. Maybe you can make a vaccine or a pill for old people, but that's no reason to panic everyone else.

 

[adalbertmgrm]

SHOCKING JUMP in Vaccine Deaths Reported This Week at CDC-Linked VAERS Tracking Website​

There are more US deaths related to vaccines in 2021 in less than 5 months than there were the entire past decade.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/shocking-jump-vaccine-deaths-reported-week-cdc-linked-vaers-tracking-website/

Negative experiences about the vaccine are not covered in the mainstream media. As far as I know, only the BBC deals with them. (as the most famous media) What is more important for now is that it is not an equal and unbiased source of news. At the moment, the media is not ready to cover the negative experiences of the vaccine. The majority of all media outlets in the world are absurd and overly optimistic. There are people who go to the hospital because of the severe side effects of the vaccine and the media does not broadcast them.

 

[Nihilism]

Negative experiences about the vaccine are not covered in the mainstream media. As far as I know, only the BBC deals with them. (as the most famous media) What is more important for now is that it is not an equal and unbiased source of news. At the moment, the media is not ready to cover the negative experiences of the vaccine. The majority of all media outlets in the world are absurd and overly optimistic. There are people who go to the hospital because of the severe side effects of the vaccine and the media does not broadcast them.

What do you mean? There's a shit tonne of articles about the negative effects of the vaccine, but also how they're negligible compared to the real thing. Every week there's a new one, the latest one being about heart inflammation or something.

 

[adalbertmgrm]

The only issue here is that the reports you're showing are from the CDC.

CDC, WHO and major news outlets have been bribed by big pharma.

Don't believe me?

Ask yourself why doctors and scientists with DECADES of experience in virology are silenced and banned from platforms such as Youtube, Facebook and are not mentioned on the bbc? Just for expressing their alternative viewpoint, that doesn't fit the big pharma narative.

As a result, CDC, WHO and mainstream news are not valid sources of information.

Virologists and doctors, who are truly science titles, are ignored. They also have the right to speak, and these rights are being violated. Whereas science was neutral and meant discussion. Of course, you can continue to work as an institution, but you cannot close the discussion environment. You can continue to be surpassed, but you cannot avoid criticism. In fact, these are not even criticisms, but different opinions. As an authoritarian institution, WHO does this and does not know that it discredits them. Because if you block the discussion, how can you find faults? That's why WHO is losing its credibility more and more. Because institutions that prevent free and impartial discussions eventually lose credibility.

As a reason for doing this, they say that they are misinforming the society. Is the WHO the institution to certify who is wrong or right, and is WHO a God? Can't there be other better and more successful free scientists than WHO? Or can there never be a truly brilliant and successful doctor, a virologist, anywhere in the world? Maybe scientists and virologists with different views will discover a stupid mistake of the WHO and it will benefit the whole world.

I call WHO a screenwriter because hadn't really planned something like this, she would never have silenced the critics. "You don't want the movie to be interrupted, you censor criticism." WHO appears to be following this principle. If WHO really means well, then it is doing something very stupid. No matter what, criticism can never be blocked.

This unilateralism of the mainstream and social media will definitely be defeated in the end.

 

[svensbr]

Virologists and doctors, who are truly science titles, are ignored. They also have the right to speak, and these rights are being violated. Whereas science was neutral and meant discussion. Of course, you can continue to work as an institution, but you cannot close the discussion environment. You can continue to be surpassed, but you cannot avoid criticism. In fact, these are not even criticisms, but different opinions. As an authoritarian institution, WHO does this and does not know that it discredits them. Because if you block the discussion, how can you find faults? That's why WHO is losing its credibility more and more. Because institutions that prevent free and impartial discussions eventually lose credibility.

As a reason for doing this, they say that they are misinforming the society. Is the WHO the institution to certify who is wrong or right, and is WHO a God? Can't there be other better and more successful free scientists than WHO? Or can there never be a truly brilliant and successful doctor, a virologist, anywhere in the world? Maybe scientists and virologists with different views will discover a stupid mistake of the WHO and it will benefit the whole world.

I call WHO a screenwriter because hadn't really planned something like this, she would never have silenced the critics. "You don't want the movie to be interrupted, you censor criticism." WHO appears to be following this principle. If WHO really means well, then it is doing something very stupid. No matter what, criticism can never be blocked.

This unilateralism of the mainstream and social media will definitely be defeated in the end.

Beautifully said, everything that WHO and governments are doing now is laid out in Rockefeller Lockstep Operation 2010. This is planned decades ago, including the "vax". People are putting their lives in the hands of the most corrupt institutions and individuals, let's see how it goes.

 

[AU369]

Virologists and doctors, who are truly science titles, are ignored. They also have the right to speak, and these rights are being violated. Whereas science was neutral and meant discussion. Of course, you can continue to work as an institution, but you cannot close the discussion environment. You can continue to be surpassed, but you cannot avoid criticism. In fact, these are not even criticisms, but different opinions. As an authoritarian institution, WHO does this and does not know that it discredits them. Because if you block the discussion, how can you find faults? That's why WHO is losing its credibility more and more. Because institutions that prevent free and impartial discussions eventually lose credibility.

As a reason for doing this, they say that they are misinforming the society. Is the WHO the institution to certify who is wrong or right, and is WHO a God? Can't there be other better and more successful free scientists than WHO? Or can there never be a truly brilliant and successful doctor, a virologist, anywhere in the world? Maybe scientists and virologists with different views will discover a stupid mistake of the WHO and it will benefit the whole world.

I call WHO a screenwriter because hadn't really planned something like this, she would never have silenced the critics. "You don't want the movie to be interrupted, you censor criticism." WHO appears to be following this principle. If WHO really means well, then it is doing something very stupid. No matter what, criticism can never be blocked.

This unilateralism of the mainstream and social media will definitely be defeated in the end.

People don't understand these restrictions because they don't understand the medical system.Every doctor or scientist speaking out loudly against covid is creating a big threat of losing his license.
Doctors are ONLY allowed to execute their job with a given license which can be taken away anytime by a commission.Since the commission is since a century filled by big pharma supporters they instantly ask any licensed doctor to visit them if saying something which is against main media.
We have a few licensed doctors as friends and noone is going to vaccinate themself.When asked what their opinion is they told us they have a "no speech" instructions since many of them work in state owned facilities.They told us that majority of nurses took officialy the jab where in reality they didn't but used a simple saline solution.

It was the rothschild foundation who privatised the medical sectore over a century ago making at that time sure only wealthy people can get a doctor and later implemented commissions who indirectly control all licensed doctors and their actions.
Same goes for lawyers.Lawyers get to loud about breaking basic rights and they lose their license to be a lawyer.If you know how much effort and money is needed to get a lawyer you can imagine everyone fearing losing it just not the older ones.

 

[HoNeYBiRD]

You can speculate all you want. These types of regulations are against the human rights of people in any country, and if they were to fine anyone, it would immediately be thrown out the second it goes to a court. You can't force anyone to take a vaccine nor deny them access to essential services or jobs.

Wake up. The speculation stage is over. Nothing is getting thrown out in court.

This system is in place, where i live for ~2 months now. It's country-specific for now, there are a few countries already with similar rules. On top of this there will be a unified vaccination certificate in the EU very soon, what you need to use, if you want to travel (by plane) within the EU. If you don't have the document, you either need to quarantine/do a test or you won't be allowed to enter.
Inb4 'b-but mah human rights', it's not a new thing either. If you want to enter certain tropical countries, you need to take various vaccines before they let you in. This practice becomes more apparent now with this virus, because every country is affected.

True, you can't force anyone to take the vaccine, at least not in democracies, but they can encourage people to do so in creative ways.

It's also true, that people cannot be denied access to essential services, but which one of the services i mentioned above are essential? It's not essential to go to bars, concerts, gyms, sports events or festivals.

It's a new situation. Apparently the things that violate human rights are getting re-interpreted as we speak and if something seemingly violates human rights, but solves a greater good, probably it's not violating human rights after all. On the personal level maybe, but not when it comes to the society as a whole.

You can't keep everything closed indefinitely or can't keep reintroducing restrictions, when newer and newer waves hit and bring the economy to a halt periodically. Accept it or not, lack of a better solution, presently to our best knowledge vaccination is the only way out.