Google deindexing posts across all my sites

[clock]

Yea I would assume any numbers like that to be in a DR of that range, makes sense, it's weird they limit your indexing at that level of DR perhaps because you didn't post new content for so long when you shock it, it just ignores,

Most likely, those pages are only a few to 6 months old so I’ll wait it out and see what happens

 

[popbradley]

the thing I have noticed with mine is almost all, except maybe 4, of the posts that are classified as “excluded” were posts from the beginning stages of the website. Could be a coincidence but I wouldn’t classify those as “high quality” to be honest. I was paying 10 dollars per 1000 words from an agency. I now pay about 20 per 1k words and that’s from writers from upwork that I’d consider very good. Maybe google somehow saw the low quality in those articles but I doubt that.

 

[KH1188]

the thing I have noticed with mine is almost all, except maybe 4, of the posts that are classified as “excluded” were posts from the beginning stages of the website. Could be a coincidence but I wouldn’t classify those as “high quality” to be honest. I was paying 10 dollars per 1000 words from an agency. I now pay about 20 per 1k words and that’s from writers from upwork that I’d consider very good. Maybe google somehow saw the low quality in those articles but I doubt that.

I'm not exactly sure what is determined as good quality versus bad quality, I really don't think the quality has anything to do with it..the reason quality content is mention is because its subjective and it can always be given for the reason your content isnt ranking/indexing after all what would happen if they just came out and said you don't have enough authority for us to show your content, it doesn't matter what you write everyone would go nuts, but if I say its your site speed, or your content quality, or your UX then you spend time struggling to figure it out, the top sites in the US have terrible site speed, skeleton pages, and frankly bad UX, so why are they getting 15000 hits a month to a page with 200 words copied from somewhere else or a category page with 2 products get 150,000 hits a month...UX is also a joke home page-category-product how complicated is that...but people talk about UX like its a secret..or your UX is bad that's why you have high BR no it's all bot traffic...that's why...when I remove the 100%/0 second bounce rates from my analytics my BR is 20%

 

[HustleTong]

It's the norm for new domains. Might take 6 months or more to stabilize.
No worries.

 

[KH1188]

It's the norm for new domains. Might take 6 months or more to stabilize.
No worries.

Well, we are seeing this into 1-year plus. But our DR is 8 but if you build a bunch of links to a site with no traffic, it's not exactly what anyone would call natural

 

[popbradley]

It's the norm for new domains. Might take 6 months or more to stabilize.
No worries.

So the drop I’m seeing with Valid pages is normal? If it’s normal why do I see others saying it’s not normal and some of them panicking about the problem.

I am just curious. I’d like to think it was a normal thing to happen but following tons of people’s journeys on here and YouTube and not seeing this happen to them, and if it does they get worried.

 

[KH1188]

So the drop I’m seeing with Valid pages is normal? If it’s normal why do I see others saying it’s not normal and some of them panicking about the problem.

I am just curious. I’d like to think it was a normal thing to happen but following tons of people’s journeys on here and YouTube and not seeing this happen to them, and if it does they get worried.

I dont think its "normal" I think the normal is new sites with low DR are getting tossed into the search trash bin...im seeing massive sites that should be crushing it getting destroyed simply because they are a few years old without a ton of amazing links...

 

[terrycody]

So the drop I’m seeing with Valid pages is normal? If it’s normal why do I see others saying it’s not normal and some of them panicking about the problem.

I am just curious. I’d like to think it was a normal thing to happen but following tons of people’s journeys on here and YouTube and not seeing this happen to them, and if it does they get worried.

For one thing can be sure

If site:yourdomain.com gives only 4 results on Google, you get a penalty, we called this "4 results penalty", but I found that, no every penalized blog will show 4, some show random pages also, but the result is same, you get fucked, and it nearly can't recover no matter what.

All in all, fuck Google.

 

[popbradley]

For one thing can be sure

If site:yourdomain.com gives only 4 results on Google, you get a penalty, we called this "4 results penalty", but I found that, no every penalized blog will show 4, some show random pages also, but the result is same, you get fucked, and it nearly can't recover no matter what.

All in all, fuck Google.

ive seen that too and “luckily” my number of results for site:website.com have actually been increasing oddly enough even though search console shows more and more pages lost. Maybe it will eventually catch up and my search pages will start to plummet as well until I get that dreaded result.

 

[intiims12]

sounds like you did some blackhat stuff

 

[popbradley]

I dont think its "normal" I think the normal is new sites with low DR are getting tossed into the search trash bin...im seeing massive sites that should be crushing it getting destroyed simply because they are a few years old without a ton of amazing links...

my DR is actually 15 right now but a lot of authority sites in my niche are like DR 50+. I don’t target keywords they are going for however. I do understand what you mean by them ranking by just DR alone. It’s EXTREMELY frustrating seeing these sites mass target keywords with MAYBE 500 words, or less, of content and just never be able to be best because they have a massive age and DR above you. Even if you write an article that covers the topic much better you won’t outrank them unless you somehow get tons of links. And I’m talking when they have 0 links to that page.

 

[popbradley]

sounds like you did some blackhat stuff

If you ever purchase any kind of link it’s considered black hat but I only have DA 30+ (mostly 50+) Guest posts pointing to my site. Almost every single link is either generic, naked urls, or branded. None of them target exact match keyword. Other then that nothing.

 

[KH1188]

sounds like you did some blackhat stuff

I doubt it...that's always the excuse when new sites get dumped on..my shitz clean as a whistle, so whats the excuse there my site is slow...lol

 

[KH1188]

If you ever purchase any kind of link it’s considered black hat but I only have DA 30+ (mostly 50+) Guest posts pointing to my site. Almost every single link is either generic, naked urls, or branded. None of them target exact match keyword. Other then that nothing.

I doubt that has anything to do with it...go take a look at the 1000's of blogs generating millions of views with exact keyword match links up the ass...thats what they want exact anchor text, not every link is naked or brand name...and thats legit, its not BH, black hat is PBNS or paying cash to a webmaster for a link...

 

[KH1188]

my DR is actually 15 right now but a lot of authority sites in my niche are like DR 50+. I don’t target keywords they are going for however. I do understand what you mean by them ranking by just DR alone. It’s EXTREMELY frustrating seeing these sites mass target keywords with MAYBE 500 words, or less, of content and just never be able to be best because they have a massive age and DR above you. Even if you write an article that covers the topic much better you won’t outrank them unless you somehow get tons of links. And I’m talking when they have 0 links to that page.

DR 15 is to low...you really cant do anything below 20s just look at all the sites crushing it DR 58, 46, etc etc.its no secret

 

[popbradley]

DR 15 is to low...you really cant do anything below 20s just look at all the sites crushing it DR 58, 46, etc etc.its no secret

I get what you are saying but sites in my niche that also crush it are DA 5 to 10. Mine you, it’s not the crazy hard keywords as the high DA sites take those, but they kill it in keywords I target. Sometimes it just feels like google hates some sites for some reason That can’t be figure out. I don’t think DA 15 is awful for a 6 month old site But of course isn’t high up there like DA 50s.

 

[KH1188]

i hear you, im not sure to be honest...i have never seen a low DR sites crush it...how old are the competitor sites?

 

[popbradley]

i hear you, im not sure to be honest...i have never seen a low DR sites crush it...how old are the competitor sites?

the low DR sites I’m talking about are like 3 years old or more. So they have age on their side except that one guy who’s site is like 3 months old but I’m not sure how he’s ranking.

 

[thejet7]

Does anybody who has had this problem on their site manage to get another new site started without the problem? Or does it happen to all of them now?

 

[thejet7]

the low DR sites I’m talking about are like 3 years old or more. So they have age on their side except that one guy who’s site is like 3 months old but I’m not sure how he’s ranking.

What sort of niche is this? Mine is pets