Most Sites Are Not Doing Well It Seems

[WorkingNow]

Curious whats ur main site DR BTW

DR doesn't matter, its about your content and contextual of your link. A DR 5 website can index faster than a DR70.

 

[Mike Haskins]

DR doesn't matter, its about your content and contextual of your link. A DR 5 website can index faster than a DR70.

I don't think that's true honestly, but I would love to see that...i can tell you I can rank any trash two-sentence thing here in under 5 mins and its not about content, meanwhile a site dedicated to hamburgers with a dr of 5 or 6 cant index a 5000-word article in under a few weeks if months all about burgers...a dr 5 site wouldn't have enough contextual links at best that's 2 or 3 links from better DR sites and that's not enough to do anything at all....

 

[Aquinas]

Curious your pulling in that much OT with that few OK, normally at best its a 1:1 ratio your at a 10:1 ratio never seen that before and im talking analysis against 1000 sites lol

Maybe I got lucky, no idea! Journey is here: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/my-first-blogging-journey.1218744/

 

[WorkingNow]

I don't think that's true honestly, but I would love to see that...i can tell you I can rank any trash two-sentence thing here in under 5 mins and its not about content, meanwhile a site dedicated to hamburgers with a dr of 5 or 6 cant index a 5000-word article in under a few weeks if months all about burgers...a dr 5 site wouldn't have enough contextual links at best that's 2 or 3 links from better DR sites and that's not enough to do anything at all....

DR doesn't matter, Google doesn't use DR. You can easily find examples of low DR sites ranking for competitive terms. Better DR, worse DR these things don't mean anything. A low DR site can have a better link profile than a high DR site, plus more authority in a topic than a high DR site.

 

[Mike Haskins]

DR doesn't matter, Google doesn't use DR. You can easily find examples of low DR sites ranking for competitive terms. Better DR, worse DR these things don't mean anything. A low DR site can have a better link profile than a high DR site, plus more authority in a topic than a high DR site.

any examples? Perhaps a DR under 10 ranking for 20k+ keywords with 10k+ visitors a month or a site hitting a high volume keyword in top ten of SERPS with a DR under 10. and your basis for all of this is that it's based on contextual links? im just curious because it seems from analyzing all the SERPS is all players with lots of links..lots and lots of them and you know what that means...

 

[Pink Smoke]

Maybe the only people complaining are the ones getting crushed..the few making a bucks don't say a word...

I believe this is the case. Why complain when there is no reason to?

 

[Codliver]

not having any issues indexing, stuff indexing almost instantly. I think you need to consider the fact that something you are doing be it onsite or offsite is causing you issues with google.

Brand new site 500 pages, all manual written unique content. Over a week and 5 pages are indexed; clearly Google has changed its index time.

 

[Mike Haskins]

Brand new site 500 pages, all manual written unique content. Over a week and 5 pages are indexed; clearly Google has changed its index time.

and yet this wonderful post with all 3 sentences of its original content was indexed and in the SERPS in under 4 mins. wonderful isnt it...

 

[rafark]

I get the impression from the constant bombardment of updates and throttles and the aftermath of comments about it that most sites are getting pummeled since last year. It seems everyone is pushing content like crazy, making links like crazy and its all ignored and shoved into a hole, nothing is getting indexed, no indexed KW's, very slight DR movements, and no organic traffic, actions, or sales..

Maybe the only people complaining are the ones getting crushed..the few making a bucks don't say a word...

Curious peoples response

That seems to be the case, but you have to remember that in the serps, for every page that goes down, another goes up. In theory, there should be an equal amount of winners and losers.

 

[Mike Haskins]

That seems to be the case, but you have to remember that for every page that goes down, another goes up.

It actually seems that for most queries there are very few relevant articles that can show, there may be 500000000 results but it doesn't take but a few scrolls before your search about BURGERS turns into weight loss articles or something else completely irrelevant

 

[Codliver]

and yet this wonderful post with all 3 sentences of its original content was indexed and in the SERPS in under 4 mins. wonderful isnt it...

Of course, a pre-existing site with a high level of authority will index in minutes. That says nothing about brand new websites, which was the point.