slarkpol
BANNED
- Jan 12, 2020
- 1,567
- 630
Thanks for your reviews !
A few spots are still available for review copies !!
Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter slarkpol
- Start date
- Status
Thanks for your reviews !
A few spots are still available for review copies !!
R4v3nbl4ck
Senior Member
- Sep 29, 2020
- 1,071
- 1,313
Interested in a review copy.
Doctor Sleep
Elite Member
- Sep 21, 2016
- 2,467
- 1,741
Interested in a review copy
- May 30, 2019
- 13,475
- 10,664
I was offered a review copy of this service
Key takeaways:
Easy readability
Will fit in for money sites
Well descriptive and cogent
Communication with the seller was really fast
Impressive TAT
Good luck with sales!
Key takeaways:
Easy readability
Will fit in for money sites
Well descriptive and cogent
Communication with the seller was really fast
Impressive TAT
Good luck with sales!
Ryzeal
Registered Member
- Jul 21, 2018
- 94
- 61
I was offered a review for this.
Pros:
Pros:
- The writing definitely feels different and there's a vibe to it.
- A very minor mistake such as punctuation.
- Can be put on the money site.
- There's seem a bit of delay in communication but overall is excellent!
slarkpol
BANNED
- Jan 12, 2020
- 1,567
- 630
Thank you for your review.
Pm sent to everyone until now.
Waiting for more people interested in testing this service !
- Sep 25, 2013
- 4,705
- 2,701
Received Review Copy.
My honest review
I was actually impressed with the overall quality. No grammar errors, the sentences made perfect sense and you clearly see that the writer was a native (not like other services that claim native writer but unless its a kid writing there's no way they would be native, This service you can 100% see it was written by a native no doubt.)
The article came with plenty of different subjects talked about, subjects which either the writer already knew decently well about or they did proper research which is actually impressive since it would take a decent bit of time to research & write about the different topics.
Overall, it's honestly a good service for its price, no doubt about it. I've seen worse writing asking for higher prices.
9/10
My honest review
I was actually impressed with the overall quality. No grammar errors, the sentences made perfect sense and you clearly see that the writer was a native (not like other services that claim native writer but unless its a kid writing there's no way they would be native, This service you can 100% see it was written by a native no doubt.)
The article came with plenty of different subjects talked about, subjects which either the writer already knew decently well about or they did proper research which is actually impressive since it would take a decent bit of time to research & write about the different topics.
Overall, it's honestly a good service for its price, no doubt about it. I've seen worse writing asking for higher prices.
9/10
xReminisce
Elite Member
- Dec 29, 2012
- 7,338
- 36,669
Got my review copy and i´m happy with the quality.
- the article was good, way better than what we used to get of fiverr.
- reading score 64, grammar ok, no typos
- they made the best out of the little informations i gave them on the topic (i had the cheaper option)
- they followed my guideline exactly
- huge plus: article was delivered within one day!!
Bottom Line: Great service for the money, will definitely order more.
- the article was good, way better than what we used to get of fiverr.
- reading score 64, grammar ok, no typos
- they made the best out of the little informations i gave them on the topic (i had the cheaper option)
- they followed my guideline exactly
- huge plus: article was delivered within one day!!
Bottom Line: Great service for the money, will definitely order more.
Fussganger
Regular Member
- May 9, 2018
- 259
- 337
REVIEW TIME:
I was offered a review copy the & following are my thoughts.
I received the original article and then another variant the next day without me asking. So I will review both:
1st Article:
I don't think this was written by a native speaker. The sentences were not flowing at all and the same point was repeated multiple times which could've been better summed. It seemed like during the research, some bullet points were noted down and then connected together.
Also, it was 100% not proofread. Again, any proofreader would recognize that the article has no flow and mistakes - for e.g. the following sentence should be talking about someone who is selling something at a yard, not the yard itself.
1st Article - Variant:
I don't know if OP realized his mistake, or was the 2nd variant a gesture of goodwill, but this was surprisingly good.
The research was really good and impressive. The actual writing flowed really good and it definitely wasn't the same writer as the one who wrote the previous article. It was probably also proofread since there weren't any glaring mistakes or confusing sentences or flat-out sentences that made no sense - quality stuff!
Final Verdict:
If I can get the person who wrote the 2nd article, I wouldn't have a problem ordering from the OP, since the research was writing was surprisingly good. I'd give OP the benefit of the doubt that he realized that the 1st article wasn't up to standards and therefore reached out with the second variant without me asking and delivered on his promise of qualty.
Hope it helps.
I was offered a review copy the & following are my thoughts.
I received the original article and then another variant the next day without me asking. So I will review both:
1st Article:
I don't think this was written by a native speaker. The sentences were not flowing at all and the same point was repeated multiple times which could've been better summed. It seemed like during the research, some bullet points were noted down and then connected together.
Also, it was 100% not proofread. Again, any proofreader would recognize that the article has no flow and mistakes - for e.g. the following sentence should be talking about someone who is selling something at a yard, not the yard itself.
1st Article - Variant:
I don't know if OP realized his mistake, or was the 2nd variant a gesture of goodwill, but this was surprisingly good.
The research was really good and impressive. The actual writing flowed really good and it definitely wasn't the same writer as the one who wrote the previous article. It was probably also proofread since there weren't any glaring mistakes or confusing sentences or flat-out sentences that made no sense - quality stuff!
Final Verdict:
If I can get the person who wrote the 2nd article, I wouldn't have a problem ordering from the OP, since the research was writing was surprisingly good. I'd give OP the benefit of the doubt that he realized that the 1st article wasn't up to standards and therefore reached out with the second variant without me asking and delivered on his promise of qualty.
Hope it helps.
slarkpol
BANNED
- Jan 12, 2020
- 1,567
- 630
PM Sent to all of you !
Thank you for your review !
Thank you for your review !
I appreciate your long-detailed review .
The explanation is simple : you are not the only one that has received 2 variants , this happened because I assigned the same task to more than 1 of our writers simply because I wasn't sure which one will be able to do it first ( April was very busy for us ) .
Because of the current overload,some of our writers(usually the new ones) hurry up and miss some obvious mistakes ,even though I suppose that even the 1st article might have been considerably better than what can usually be found around.
I haven't read any of the 2 articles , and realistically speaking,you could have received a better article first and a bad one the 2nd time ,the problem would have been the same. I will however point the mistakes presented by you up above to the 1st writer.
In a normal situation,if you'd have bought an article and you'd have received a 'fast variant' as the 1st one might have been , it would have easily been eligible for a REVISION ,and the problem would have been solved ,and you'd have received an article similar to the 2nd one you received.
Thank you again for your review, these long-detailed opinions are more than useful as they help us improve our service .
Thank you for your review !
Thank you for your review !
I appreciate your long-detailed review .
The explanation is simple : you are not the only one that has received 2 variants , this happened because I assigned the same task to more than 1 of our writers simply because I wasn't sure which one will be able to do it first ( April was very busy for us ) .
Because of the current overload,some of our writers(usually the new ones) hurry up and miss some obvious mistakes ,even though I suppose that even the 1st article might have been considerably better than what can usually be found around.
I haven't read any of the 2 articles , and realistically speaking,you could have received a better article first and a bad one the 2nd time ,the problem would have been the same. I will however point the mistakes presented by you up above to the 1st writer.
In a normal situation,if you'd have bought an article and you'd have received a 'fast variant' as the 1st one might have been , it would have easily been eligible for a REVISION ,and the problem would have been solved ,and you'd have received an article similar to the 2nd one you received.
Thank you again for your review, these long-detailed opinions are more than useful as they help us improve our service .
jayzzon123
Junior Member
- May 6, 2014
- 189
- 31
interested in review copy
I received a free 400-word review copy.
I didn't give much details to the OP but overall quality is good for the price. I am not a native speaker so can't say much about grammar and stuff, but the structure sentences are ok and texts do make sense and explain topics they are about.
The only thing was missing is conclusion, but I guess if I gave more strict article blueprint to the OP it wouldn't be a problem.
I didn't give much details to the OP but overall quality is good for the price. I am not a native speaker so can't say much about grammar and stuff, but the structure sentences are ok and texts do make sense and explain topics they are about.
The only thing was missing is conclusion, but I guess if I gave more strict article blueprint to the OP it wouldn't be a problem.
slarkpol
BANNED
- Jan 12, 2020
- 1,567
- 630
Blacksmith007
Newbie
- Jan 9, 2018
- 23
- 14
I got my article for the review copy.
Great quality here,the article is 100% unique. Definitely a native writer that wrote it and it even includes proper formatting (titles etc) which isn't something all writers do. There is literally zero work I need to do to this article, just publish it straight to your site. I have to say, I could not have written this article better myself.
Great quality here,the article is 100% unique. Definitely a native writer that wrote it and it even includes proper formatting (titles etc) which isn't something all writers do. There is literally zero work I need to do to this article, just publish it straight to your site. I have to say, I could not have written this article better myself.
- Status