Web 2.0 blogs related question(s)

[notNewB]

1. How frequently you can have backlinks to your main site from each of your web 2.0 blogs?
Supposing you have 10 web 2.0s and you publish 1 article per week on each of them (all unique articles), can you have a backlink to your main site from every second such article? 40 articles a month on all blogs = 20 backlinks. Is that okay or web 2.0s are treated like pbns - 1 link from one pbn?

2. Can you create these web 2.0 blogs on behalf of your original brand name?
Or they are created with no footprints between each other?

3. Is there a limit to having web 2.0 blogs?
Can you have 50 of 'em?

4. Also, can someone please confirm that this answer is still valid as it was answered back in 2018.
Can you manage all your web 2.0 blogs without a proxy and on one email address as long as you create one blog per platform.

You won't need proxy if you make 1 blog per platform.
You should think about proxies when you want to build more than a couple of blogs per platform

You can use 1 email for as many platforms as you want.
When you want to create a second account on the same platform you will need another email.

Thanks in advance.

 

[tazarbm]

1. google takes into account ONLY 1 backlink from each unique domain. In terms of link juice I mean...

Besides, web 2.0s are really not that powerful anymore, and the ones that are powerful have started being cocksuckers and noindexing your posts (Medium for example has started doing this, I have read this news few days ago on this forum).

Furthermore, if you're gonna put your time and energy into writing 40 blog posts for web 2.0s websites (which can delete your account without notice, or render all of your efforts useless by noindexing your links like Medium had started doing) you're better off creating your own PBN which you can nurture and grow, and manipulate whichever way you want.

3. of course. The more the better, but... like I said, it's not worth nurturing them. Just slam a unique (preferably 1000+ words long) article with one backlink to your homepage and forget about them. Eventually check once or twice per year to see whether the links are still there and to fix them if they get removed, noindexed, or whatever.

I don't know the answers to questions 2 and 4.

 

[Panther28]

yes to all your questions, just dont spend so much articles on web 2.0, only a handful are fine at most

Specifically on question 2, you can have a brand type site, or a general type site, up to whatever might be easier and look the best really.

 

[notNewB]

~

Thanks for the answers. I currently don't have the resources to build and maintain a pbn. And I'm going to use the $1 articles.

 

[tazarbm]

Thanks for the answers. I currently don't have the resources to build and maintain a pbn. And I'm going to use the $1 articles.

no problem. And yeah, owning a PBN can be costly if you don't know what you're doing, but if you start adding even one website to your portfolio each month (very affordable by anyone with a job in any tier 1 and tier 2 country) within 2 years you will have enough websites to boost medium competition keywords from pages 3+ to page 1 of google without paying for a single backlink.

And with the many PBN software and services that exist today you can safely have your own PBN for less than $50 a month. A very justified expense in my opinion

 

[mindmaster]

1. google takes into account ONLY 1 backlink from each unique domain. In terms of link juice I mean...

What is your source?

We know that there is a diminishing return from a second link from the same domain, but I don't know of any source stating you get benefit from ONLY 1 link per domain.

To OP.

1. As many as you like. However, you won't get much benefits from multiple links. As for posting new content there is a benefit, but again it can be marginal. The only exception could be if your blogs have traffic and they are more than just a link farm.
2. It depends on your strategy.
3. In theory, No. But, even so, it depends on quality I would say.
4. You can.

 

[Rankster]

1 A backlink that you get from one web 2.0 sites are quite useful as well if your content is good,
2 On Web 2.0 platforms you can find footprints
But, some of custom web 2.0 are made for their own unique platform, that not have any footprint.
3 You can use as many web 2.0 sites as you want to be active on. Make sure that you share good quality unique content to all those platforms.

 

[tazarbm]

What is your source?

experience

 

[notNewB]

Thanks for all answers.

~
3. In theory, No. But, even so, it depends on quality I would say.

Why exactly you cannot have many of them? Can this strategy carry a certain risk after it exceeds some amount limit or what?

 

[mindmaster]

Thanks for all answers.


Why exactly you cannot have many of them? Can this strategy carry a certain risk after it exceeds some amount limit or what?

You asked if there is a limit.
Here is a nice article on using multiple links from the same domain: https://ahrefs.com/blog/links-from-same-domain/
However, consider the domain value.

experience

So, no source.

 

[tazarbm]

So, no source.

Personal experience is the best source

 

[mindmaster]

Personal experience is the best source

'experience' without data is an opinion.

 

[tazarbm]

'experience' without data is an opinion.

If people tell you to drink milk cause it's healthy but you don't drink because you know you are lactose intolerant are you going to believe the data, or your body?

Anyway, I don't negate the importance of data (especially in SEO). All I'm saying is that sometimes data can lie, and in this case it does. Ok, maybe you get a 5-10% boost to your link juice, although I doubt, but I'd still rather focus my efforts on upping the number of RDs than the number of backlinks from the same 10-20 domains. THIS is what personal experience is, and which I trust over any other screwed source you might throw at me (I actually saw that you've referenced an ahref source to support your theory. I don't care anymore about what ahrefs has to say to be honest... or google for that matter)

 

[mindmaster]

If people tell you to drink milk cause it's healthy but you don't drink because you know you are lactose intolerant are you going to believe the data, or your body?

Anyway, I don't negate the importance of data (especially in SEO). All I'm saying is that sometimes data can lie, and in this case it does. Ok, maybe you get a 5-10% boost to your link juice, although I doubt, but I'd still rather focus my efforts on upping the number of RDs than the number of backlinks from the same 10-20 domains. THIS is what personal experience is, and which I trust over any other screwed source you might throw at me (I actually saw that you've referenced an ahref source to support your theory. I don't care anymore about what ahrefs has to say to be honest... or google for that matter)

What the body tell and what the medical community thinks it knows is far from SEO.

Anyway, I am not refuting your experience mate. All I was asking is if you have data on it, other than your own experience, strategy and beliefs.

As for my personal experience, I see improvement from subsequent links from the same domain. However, this seems to apply more for genuine sites that rank and have traffic.
For low quality links such as web2.0's I wouldn't make an effort to get multiple links from one blog.

 

[hideath]

1. How frequently you can have backlinks to your main site from each of your web 2.0 blogs?
Supposing you have 10 web 2.0s and you publish 1 article per week on each of them (all unique articles), can you have a backlink to your main site from every second such article? 40 articles a month on all blogs = 20 backlinks. Is that okay or web 2.0s are treated like pbns - 1 link from one pbn?

i don't go for other than more out of a single link from a PBN domain, web 2.0,
the power of the links won't be the same in most cases, but you can add tier 2 links to each of these pages to boost them up
ideally, get a link from the web 2.0 homepage (contextual) and add content from time to time to keep it up
this is not required for all of them tho, diversity is good

2. Can you create these web 2.0 blogs on behalf of your original brand name?
Or they are created with no footprints between each other?

it's better to avoid that for the footprints as you said

3. Is there a limit to having web 2.0 blogs?
Can you have 50 of 'em?

you can have even thousands,
just make sure to drip-feed their indexing and each one have a quality content, design, etc... (for the tier 1)

4. Also, can someone please confirm that this answer is still valid as it was answered back in 2018.
Can you manage all your web 2.0 blogs without a proxy and on one email address as long as you create one blog per platform.

yes, no problem with that,
you can use a single IP to create an infinity of them as long as each one of them is separated
each of these web 2.0s services has its own database with registered IPs, it's not a common one
but if you want to create a new one on the same platform, you gonna need a new IP, especially if you're doing it in a short amount of time

Web 2.0s can be very useful if they are built and used the right way,
mixing them up with quality PBNs, guest posts and crowd links would be much better

 

[tazarbm]

What the body tell and what the medical community thinks it knows is far from SEO.

Anyway, I am not refuting your experience mate. All I was asking is if you have data on it, other than your own experience, strategy and beliefs.

As for my personal experience, I see improvement from subsequent links from the same domain. However, this seems to apply more for genuine sites that rank and have traffic.
For low quality links such as web2.0's I wouldn't make an effort to get multiple links from one blog.

I was trying to make a point (that experience is more important than data), that's why I gave you that example. And good for you if you're ranking with multiple links from the same domain. I prefer to focus my efforts on acquiring more RDs, and that's that!

Peace!

 

[TimDawsone]

I don't really agree with people who saying Web2.0s not working or at least its not working like it used to . Disgreed!

Just treat 1 web2.0 account 1 backlink
5000+ quality article
tiered link may be a GSA contextual blast . no fancy indexers nothing. If you done content part with RIGHT KEYWORDS there is no issues.

 

[mksit]

So, from the above conversation, I just wanted to say I am little late to start creating Web 2.0 blogs as my tier-1.

So, my qsn is-
In 2022, are the web 2.0 pbn technic still powerful? Should I start creating new web 2.0s as my PBN to push low to medium competition?

Can Anyone response me who are actually getting result in 2022 from new web 2.0s as tier 1 PBN??

 

[blackbeans]

When strategizing your blog footprint, your focus is to mimic the "natural footprint."

This means not linking to the same page over and over again.

It also means not dropping a ton of links at the same time and including credible and natural calls to action.

There has to be randomization.

Finally, you should strongly consider setting things up in such a way that the content that you're linking from is enhanced by the information on the page you're linking to.

Regardless, whatever anchor text you're using for SEO (I mean this as the real keyword targets and not "junk" anchor texts that you use to create a "natural linking effect") must be targeted in terms of search intent.

For example, if you are using a certain keyword from your Web 2.0 blog and it's linking to your main site, deliver on the search intent of the anchor keyword text you're using to link out on your target page.