I am going to hell for this method. How to make a million dollars a year and up using a YouTube exploit.

[battlepanty]

How many views do you get per video?

 

[BabaLoos]

So today I would like to give back to the community. A community that has sadly, kind of let me down recently. What I mean by this is there is a lot of misinformation and disinformation going on inside this forum.


By that I mean people lying about stuff just to scare off newbies for no good reason knowing full well everything Is just about saturated. With that being said I am going to try my best to make a big difference in this community.


So let's talk about microworkers. Well in case you do not know, microwrokers is a type of website where you pay real people to complete various types of tasks. Some people on this forum truly think(or purposely spreading false information) that microworkers.com is the only microworker website where you pay people to watch your YouTube videos, like your Instagram posts, etc. That couldn't be further from the truth.


In fact, this is where members of this forum always claim the site does not work or the site is too expensive. Well newsflash, that is not the only website. There are others like Mturk, Picoworkers, Rapidworkers, and plenty others that are cheaper. That is right people if you read it this far you should know I am not holding back.


Furthermore, with those cheaper alternatives, you still have members spreading even more false information claiming that your money will be spent in vain as these sites do not work and you should worry about doing things organically. Well that is another lie. Even if you use the actual microworkers website or cheaper alternatives, it does in fact works.


How you might ask? Well I tried all the sites I mentioned above and it grew my accounts tremendously on different social media accounts. I am talking about YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Twitter, etc. Being that these are real people with unique IPs and fingerprints, their engagement triggers the algorithm each and every time. I have no idea as to why people in this forum claim it is too expensive or it does not work.


I need to say all of this because I want people to know that the answer is right in front of you. You no longer have to worry about misleading smm panels and no these microworkers websites does not take a long time to start. Every time I used them, my posts went viral immediately because the engagement was coming in fast all at once. I am talking within a hour or less depending on your budget. In other words, when I used Mturk, Microworkers, Picoworkers, and Rapidworkers all at once, my YouTube video went viral over night.


Keep in mind these are real people not bots and Mturk along has a huge user base. Furthermore, when I placed the order on all these sites within the same day for a YouTube video I was promoting. I had clear rules for sufficient proof that the task was being done. By 2:30pm in the afternoon I started to receive views, likes, comments, shares, and subs. By the end of the night I had 100k plus views, subs, shares, comments, likes on that video.


No YouTube did not ban me or take down that video. Why would they? These are real people not bots so in YouTube eyes this was organic and I remember being in the trending section. I also remember looking at my analytics and noticed the algorithm was having a fill day recommending and suggesting my content everywhere. By the end of the month I had one million plus subs easily with the heavy push from the algorithm.


That is why we are all here. You suppose to promote your video and then let the algorithm do the rest. Not using smm panels just to look at pretty high numbers that is not going to trigger the algorithm and do nothing for your video or what ever social media post you are doing.

Personally I like to use MTurk because you can target by demographics and country. MTurk is the biggest microworker site of them all.

With this method you assign as many HITS you like and target by country and other demographics. Being that I live in a tier one country, I only assign the HITS in those tier one countries and completely exploiting the YouTube algorithm to my desire. I ran three accounts and hit a million subs within 31 days across the board.


Also notice how on the TikTok forum on Blackhat World is a complete mess? Well guess what? I applied the same method to five TikTok accounts. When I assigned the hits targeting the tier one countries, I told them to like the video, watch the video to completion, leave a relevant positive comment, and to share the video, I hit the For You Page that day and gained 500,236 followers within two fucking days on one account alone.


This method can be applied to any social media account you are trying to go viral with. Reddit, Facebook, Snapchat, YouTube, Pinterest, TikTok, Instagram, etc.


Keep in mind these are real people, not bots. So each IP and fingerprint will be unique. The anti-bot detection will fail every time and those social media platforms will think everything is going viral organically.


Thanks everybody this is my first method I posted to Blackhat World and I want everybody to have a great Happy Fucking New Year!!!!

I hear you bro...too many turd pumps here...it takes money to make money...free smiles at McDonalds could always get a job there...its free..........GOOD WORK...ALL DA BEST

 

[DesignStudio78]

When it comes to Youtube its just as bad SMM. Its really bad for ranking videos on the channel because the retention is low.
When they watch only one video, subscribe and never watch any videos again, Youtube then knows that it is a dead subscriber and will remove the subscriber.
Because of this the algorithm will no longer promote your videos in suggested/recommended.

Not convinced yet?
Go on one of these microtasking sites, take a look at there channels. All the videos are performing really poorly.

This is true if your videos are just trash and offer no value. But if your videos offer some value this is a Great method to gain some traction quickly! This is not really meant to polish a turd so to speak.

 

[sothisisnightlife]

This is true if your videos are just trash and offer no value. But if your videos offer some value this is a Great method to gain some traction quickly! This is not really meant to polish a turd so to speak.

Take a look at the videos on those sites. The channels get a small boost in viewers but the channel is ranking is so poor and it shows in the other videos they post.

If you have good content you shouldn't be using any of these methods in the first place, better to grow organically so that you can analyse the data. Then make changes to suit your audience and grow.
Use google ads instead and if you know how to you can get get it done for really cheap. Lots of tutorials on Youtube already.

 

[AlexKoro]

iHow much do you offer these people?

 

[silvi-kucedra]

I did this a few months ago with Mturk to boost a tweet, and Mturk banned my account for violating their TOS, so I wonder how you bypassed their filters.
Also if I remember well the minimum cost per click was 5cents

The amount of people in this thread who want gold on a platter is staggering. Plus of course the amount of scumbags who want "proof" when they already use this.

Anyway here are a few more details. And no, I'm not affiliated with the OP, I just use this method myself to boost pretty much everything online that relies on algorithms for ranking. This even works with Google Search, but way less than with YT, and you have to be much more careful there.

1) Do NOT make every worker watch the full video. No real human ever watches a full video. A certain percentage does, but most don't. View time (or retention time) follows a similar Pareto distribution, where most viewers will watch 20-30% of your video and skip through the rest and the remaining will watch way more than that - some half, some 2/3 and some full.

These patterns are also affected by video type. For example, music videos tend to have very high retention, because even if people don't watch the video (except for the first couple times), they listen to the song fully. Long tutorials on the other hand, on average, have lower retention (20-30%). Most videos will sit somewhere in between.

So, when you send those shitty SMM panel views with 100% retention and datacenter proxies, you are actually screaming to the algorithmic "police": here I am, and then wondering why it doesn't work. You have to understand that Google has these watch-time patterns for more than a decade now and just keeps growing. If your video gets too much out of the pattern, it will trigger a penalty.

Now, getting back to microworkers and all the other similar sites. Instead of paying 1k people to watch a full video, you pay most of them to answer 4-5 simple questions about the video. Tell them to skip the video to the relevant time/sections to find out the answers quicker. (When you link the time, make it 5-10 sec before the answer is about to show). Keep the questions with choices (3-4 tops) and very simple, answering them shouldn't take more than 1 minute. The other 2-3 minutes should be scouring the video for answers. There are plenty of people who will do HITS like this for $0.01 - 0.1.

Now, do the same with the remaining subset of users, but this time pay a lot more for more retention time. So, for example, if you want 1000 views - you pay 800 of them $0.03, 100 of them $0.12 and the last $0.3.

Add in the HIT the following for no extra pay:

Liking the video - takes literally 2 sec and all workers will do this extra. Again, the amount of likes should be rationed depending on the views, don't be stupid. Ask the 200 people for likes (people who.watch more are more likely to like) and another 200 from the 800.

Commenting - the ratio of comments is even lower than likes. On 1000 views, 50-100 comments are more than enough. Again, ask the higher-paying workers (the two 100-people categories above) for this.

Sharing - restrict this to even lower people than commenting. 30-50 shares are enough.

So, you see, you're paying $50-80 for 1k views which are almost indistinguishable from real users in terms of fingerprints (not bots) and engagement (natural view/like/comment/share patterns). Depending on the competition, you only need a few waves of this to start triggering the "suggested", "home", "related", etc.. algorithms which will bring more targeted views and repeat the cycle.

Plus, you are not wasting your money on microworkers. You are optimizing their time and your money on a sliding scale. More time required from the worker = more pay. Oh and something else, you can actually pay even cheaper than the prices above. I have found my sweet spot is about $50 for 1k views. I repeat this a few times depending on the competition. Usually, 10k views like this are enough to start getting REAL organic views from YT or Google (if you rank for anything there).

2) Now, to prevent Mturk or any other site from breaking their TOS: I will keep this short, because I'm typing on mobile and my fingers are almost dead. And also, because you guys have to use your fucking imagination to get shit done. If the TOS of a site prevents you from doing things, get the hell out of here and go to Warrior Forum or DP.

1) Embed the YT video on a website, doesn't matter which one.
2) Make the HIT related to web page testing, don't be stupid enough and put YouTube in the tile to be flagged immediately. Say the HIT is about testing the web page and more specifically, whether the embedding of the YT Video works correctly. And then lay out the specifc video instructions. Frame the HIT around web testing, which is the most used HIT in these sites and the reason why they started in the first place. Approval 90%+ guaranteed!

And to answer another question in the thread (sorry for not quoting): if you want to gain 100k organic views, you pay for 10-20k of them (depending on competition) and then let the algorithm bring the rest from YT itself. Paying microworkers for 100k views is plain stupid, unless you're in high-value high-comp niches, where the ROI is high and justified.

 

[GenesisOne]

If the TOS of a site prevents you from doing things, get the hell out of here and go to Warrior Forum or DP.

What does Warrior Forum has to do with this?
What is DP?

 

[Degen]

There was an infographic post about this method 4 years ago (BHW)

https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/tutorial-1-to-9-great-youtube-method-youtube-ppd.531422/ this one was older than the one I was referring to

 

[codemaker]

You guys just forgot one "small" fact - referral URL.

 

[Riverside]

How many view need to boost one tiktok video? And how much it cost thanks before

 

[Zuckerpurge]

You guys just forgot one "small" fact - referral URL.

Looks organic when you tell them to google a keyword you're on page two or three for, find your site, and then click through to the place you want them to go.

 

[AAW]

If you read the method carefully I said microworkers.com is not the only website, there are cheaper alternatives.

Second, Amazon does not review HITS at all and the only thing you have to do is pick a template or create your own. Personally, I used the survey with the link template, added some code and still created the HIT.

Third, to the person saying there is not enough people on MTurk, that is a lie. There are hundreds of thousands of MTurk workers. That is not even counting the other microworkers websites.

Fourth, use common sense and try the method for yourself. I will let you be the judge

You guys are on a site called Blackhat World and you are bitching about breaking a site's TOS??? Give me a fucking break.

So you spent $1,000 to get this many views and subs? Can’t you just advertise your channel on you tube itself targeting better audience for such money? I mean $1,000 spent per day or whatever is a lot to get whatever you got, I was thinking YouTube ads maybe a better idea? I’m just discussing here, asking questions as I don’t have this experience with either one of them ( the microworkers and the YT ads)

 

[sothisisnightlife]

The amount of people in this thread who want gold on a platter is staggering. Plus of course the amount of scumbags who want "proof" when they already use this.

Anyway here are a few more details. And no, I'm not affiliated with the OP, I just use this method myself to boost pretty much everything online that relies on algorithms for ranking. This even works with Google Search, but way less than with YT, and you have to be much more careful there.

1) Do NOT make every worker watch the full video. No real human ever watches a full video. A certain percentage does, but most don't. View time (or retention time) follows a similar Pareto distribution, where most viewers will watch 20-30% of your video and skip through the rest and the remaining will watch way more than that - some half, some 2/3 and some full.

These patterns are also affected by video type. For example, music videos tend to have very high retention, because even if people don't watch the video (except for the first couple times), they listen to the song fully. Long tutorials on the other hand, on average, have lower retention (20-30%). Most videos will sit somewhere in between.

So, when you send those shitty SMM panel views with 100% retention and datacenter proxies, you are actually screaming to the algorithmic "police": here I am, and then wondering why it doesn't work. You have to understand that Google has these watch-time patterns for more than a decade now and just keeps growing. If your video gets too much out of the pattern, it will trigger a penalty.

Now, getting back to microworkers and all the other similar sites. Instead of paying 1k people to watch a full video, you pay most of them to answer 4-5 simple questions about the video. Tell them to skip the video to the relevant time/sections to find out the answers quicker. (When you link the time, make it 5-10 sec before the answer is about to show). Keep the questions with choices (3-4 tops) and very simple, answering them shouldn't take more than 1 minute. The other 2-3 minutes should be scouring the video for answers. There are plenty of people who will do HITS like this for $0.01 - 0.1.

Now, do the same with the remaining subset of users, but this time pay a lot more for more retention time. So, for example, if you want 1000 views - you pay 800 of them $0.03, 100 of them $0.12 and the last $0.3.

Add in the HIT the following for no extra pay:

Liking the video - takes literally 2 sec and all workers will do this extra. Again, the amount of likes should be rationed depending on the views, don't be stupid. Ask the 200 people for likes (people who.watch more are more likely to like) and another 200 from the 800.

Commenting - the ratio of comments is even lower than likes. On 1000 views, 50-100 comments are more than enough. Again, ask the higher-paying workers (the two 100-people categories above) for this.

Sharing - restrict this to even lower people than commenting. 30-50 shares are enough.

So, you see, you're paying $50-80 for 1k views which are almost indistinguishable from real users in terms of fingerprints (not bots) and engagement (natural view/like/comment/share patterns). Depending on the competition, you only need a few waves of this to start triggering the "suggested", "home", "related", etc.. algorithms which will bring more targeted views and repeat the cycle.

Plus, you are not wasting your money on microworkers. You are optimizing their time and your money on a sliding scale. More time required from the worker = more pay. Oh and something else, you can actually pay even cheaper than the prices above. I have found my sweet spot is about $50 for 1k views. I repeat this a few times depending on the competition. Usually, 10k views like this are enough to start getting REAL organic views from YT or Google (if you rank for anything there).

2) Now, to prevent Mturk or any other site from breaking their TOS: I will keep this short, because I'm typing on mobile and my fingers are almost dead. And also, because you guys have to use your fucking imagination to get shit done. If the TOS of a site prevents you from doing things, get the hell out of here and go to Warrior Forum or DP.

1) Embed the YT video on a website, doesn't matter which one.
2) Make the HIT related to web page testing, don't be stupid enough and put YouTube in the tile to be flagged immediately. Say the HIT is about testing the web page and more specifically, whether the embedding of the YT Video works correctly. And then lay out the specifc video instructions. Frame the HIT around web testing, which is the most used HIT in these sites and the reason why they started in the first place. Approval 90%+ guaranteed!

And to answer another question in the thread (sorry for not quoting): if you want to gain 100k organic views, you pay for 10-20k of them (depending on competition) and then let the algorithm bring the rest from YT itself. Paying microworkers for 100k views is plain stupid, unless you're in high-value high-comp niches, where the ROI is high and justified.

The retention will be too low regardless and then when they subscribe they become a dead subscriber because they'll never watch your videos again. Not only that when a user is watching too many youtube videos and following a pattern a foot print is then made espentially when its done too quickly. Remember these people are taking requests, some are even running scripts in the background.

I see you've been in here since 2012 so you would know about the traffic exchange days when people got views deducted, got unpartnered from there mcn and some even got demonetized or banned.
Same shit with this again. But no one ever learns.

Literally look at the channels who are posting on these websites. They're completely dead and ranking poorly and those that look like they're pulling some views stay pulling the same amount of views and never grow there channel because you can't analyse the data to improve the content because you can't distinguish the real viewers from the microtaskers. More over, the retention is low so the chances of getting ranked higher in search, or getting suggested/recommended is decreased.

Not only that they just gained subscribers from those who subscribed to way too many different niches for the algorithm to comprehend, that viewer then doesn't click on the video from suggested/recommended which tanks ranking on future videos and then Youtube determines that viewer as a dead subscriber. Remember Youtube tests whether your content is good quality or not by pushing it to suggested/reccommended and if people don't click on it the ranking for future videos will tank.

To add to this, now that google staff sees this post, they're just going to find a way to punish those who have views from these sites. How? Maybe from reading google search history? Who knows. Never understimate google, they even managed to patch the 4g phone method when most said it was impossible, a lot of people struggling to do the ad method now and traffic exchange method was dead back in 2015/2016 i think it was.

 

[speedyallan77]

The retention will be too low regardless and then when they subscribe they become a dead subscriber because they'll never watch your videos again. Not only that when a user is watching too many youtube videos and following a pattern a foot print is then made espentially when its done too quickly. Remember these people are taking requests, some are even running scripts in the background.

I see you've been in here since 2012 so you would know about the traffic exchange days when people got views deducted, got unpartnered from there mcn and some even got demonetized or banned.
Same shit with this again. But no one ever learns.

Literally look at the channels who are posting on these websites. They're completely dead and ranking poorly and those that look like they're pulling some views stay pulling the same amount of views and never grow there channel because you can't analyse the data to improve the content because you can't distinguish the real viewers from the microtaskers. More over, the retention is low so the chances of getting ranked higher in search, or getting suggested/recommended is decreased.

Not only that they just gained subscribers from those who subscribed to way too many different niches for the algorithm to comprehend, that viewer then doesn't click on the video from suggested/recommended which tanks ranking on future videos and then Youtube determines that viewer as a dead subscriber. Remember Youtube tests whether your content is good quality or not by pushing it to suggested/reccommended and if people don't click on it the ranking for future videos will tank.

To add to this, now that google staff sees this post, they're just going to find a way to punish those who have views from these sites. How? Maybe from reading google search history? Who knows. Never understimate google, they even managed to patch the 4g phone method when most said it was impossible, a lot of people struggling to do the ad method now and traffic exchange method was dead back in 2015/2016 i think it was.

bro u r getting it all wrong.
why do u ask them to susbcribe? obviously they will be dead subs.

u dont need to ask them to susbcribe.
them watching, liking and commenting on ur video is enough to push you to suggested.

all botted methods do the same thing.
the botting methods even i use, mostly dont even have engagement, just high retention views , yet i get suggested , how?
in this case they are viewing,liking and commenting.
it will blow up the suggestion rate.

method works better than smm, ive already tested.
i ask them to send screen video recording proof of watching the full video.
i know it sounds toomuch, but i got tasks done that way.

its not hard for them to record and upload file to drive.

and lastly the channels that u r telling to check there all have trash content, thats why they dont take off.
no way u will blow up without good content.

theres no point of having the best bot or method in the world if ur content is not something that the general audience will watch.

example if i send 10k views with an ultimate undetected method, it triggers algorithm to suggest me.
but this is pointless if my content is bad, why?

coz after u trick algo into suggesting you with ur fake views, algo will suggest in batches to new audience on recommendations and "test" your video.
this might happen a few times.
if the audience who the video got suggested to, responds well, algo will re calculate and increase ur suggestion rate.
u have "passed" the test.

if the audience who the video got suggested too, does not respond well, algo will kill your video.
its as simple as that.
it "failed" the test.

on all of my channels, no botting method has ever helped content thats bad.
it has only helped the content that is good.
so on my channels i pay people to get decent content done, like animations etc.

 

[squinter]

3000 views with high retention, 3000 likes, 3000 comments.
is pure algorithm trigger.

Hey, I have a question for you.

Do I need to get 3,000 users to get 3,000 views to my video with high retention and another 3,000 users to get 3,000 likes to my video and another 3,000 users to do 3,000 comments to my video? A total of 9000 users?

Or 1 user can do view, like and comment at the same time? Just a total of 3,000 users?

 

[toysonline]

for 100K view using microsite, i wonder how much you paid...

 

[sothisisnightlife]

for 100K view using microsite, i wonder how much you paid...

Its $0.15 minimum for tier 1 view with 1 minute retention, so that would be $15,000 for 100,000 views.

 

[ieJoo]

We need more like these guides on this forum

 

[swjedinight]

Its $0.15 minimum for tier 1 view with 1 minute retention, so that would be $15,000 for 100,000 views.

You can get that cheaper. There are ways.

Who said you needed 100,000 views? You only need enough views to trigger the algo to take over. you might even get away with that with 1,000 views in some niches.

This method does work. it worked so well that they took it off and made it for VIP's.

I would bet anyone a shiny buffalo nickel that the people who are flaming this are the ones that are banking the hardest on this.

I have been on this forum for over a decade and it has always been that way.

PS - Ive tested it myself. It will trigger the algo on every single social media site. You can bank even harder if you know how to set up a farm yourself.

 

[sothisisnightlife]

You can get that cheaper. There are ways.

Who said you needed 100,000 views? You only need enough views to trigger the algo to take over. you might even get away with that with 1,000 views in some niches.

This method does work. it worked so well that they took it off and made it for VIP's.

I would bet anyone a shiny buffalo nickel that the people who are flaming this are the ones that are banking the hardest on this.

I have been on this forum for over a decade and it has always been that way.

PS - Ive tested it myself. It will trigger the algo on every single social media site. You can bank even harder if you know how to set up a farm yourself.

Banking btw... I'm searching these channels that are on these sites and all of them are doing really poorly. Thats the funny thing about this all. Its literally public, anyone here can check for themselves. So who you fooling?

Also the guy asked what is the cost of 100k views and I told him the answer.

Its interesting how you can claim that I'm "banking" on this the hardest,, when you your self could have an agenda. Maybe to deter people from other methods that work, or you own a microtasking websites or affiliated with them...

I'm open about growing organically making good content and using google ads unlisted method to gain subscribers. The method is all over Youtube. Its proven to work but no one wants to put in the effort because you have to make a good ad, actually take time to understand the Youtube algorithm, understand how to keep costs low and understand how to exploit the threshold method. Admittedly, I no longer use threshold method as its quite difficult now but I still run ads. There are tools out there too which work with 4g/residential proxies which I'm sure you know about and I don't use my self but I know work for other people. Anyway, this isn't new information to you either...