kameleo, multilogin
- Thread starter jack29
- Start date
how so? I'm thinking of using kamelelo instead of multi login. Can advice me what was your experience?
- Sep 23, 2015
- 574
- 468
Multilogin's latest update passes pixelscan.net as long as you have a good IP.
There for a while, all of these browser systems were showing 100% unique canvas on Chromium browsers, which is a problem. MLA fixed this on their latest update. I'm gonna try Kameleo because I talked to them and they said their V2 is really, really good. It's not released yet.
There for a while, all of these browser systems were showing 100% unique canvas on Chromium browsers, which is a problem. MLA fixed this on their latest update. I'm gonna try Kameleo because I talked to them and they said their V2 is really, really good. It's not released yet.
Bots-Scrapers
Elite Member
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,041
- 1,078
Why not use free option like chameleon?
Kameleo v2 can be good but not released yet. Try the mobile profiles from them.
ML is not so great but you always need good IP and no extra headers within it + older cookies loaded in container.
Thanks
Kameleo v2 can be good but not released yet. Try the mobile profiles from them.
ML is not so great but you always need good IP and no extra headers within it + older cookies loaded in container.
Thanks
iFreelancer
Elite Member
- Apr 19, 2014
- 2,038
- 939
Do you mean the Chameleon firefox extension?
@Automationdaddy
Didn't think I would call someone daddy, except my own real dad.
Do you know if its possible to run these fingerprint safe browser extension like chameleon kameleo or multilogin. In headless mode in chrome?
Pretty much impossible to scale, running multiple browsers. As chrome eats cpu and ram like a cockroach.
- Nov 23, 2020
- 3,102
- 814
I think kameleo is a good and cheap application
X0t0
Regular Member
- Aug 19, 2016
- 432
- 130
how's the Kameleo v2 update is it good, since i'm thinking to buy , multilogin is expensive for me
billywatson
Junior Member
- Jan 2, 2021
- 147
- 153
I use multilogin for some social media stuff, the tools worked well for me so far.
Vine Concepts
Newbie
- Apr 9, 2015
- 5
- 1
PixelScan.net is garbage.
I just went there right now. in a fresh browser, with absolutely zero proxy, vpn, or cloaking in any way, it said my browser fingerprint is incosistent and it thinks im spoofing my location. lol
- Sep 23, 2015
- 574
- 468
Pixelscan will tell you what it is seeing as inconsistent. Could be something as silly as not updating your browser or javascript time being different than IP time zone (common on mobile connections).
I would try to figure out exactly what it's seeing as inconsistent, then determine if that data point is something that websites would use when considering to flag a user account.
I usually check Pixelscan, Browserleaks, and IPQualityScore. However, none of those tools know how the big social media sites identify inconsistencies so they are just reporting what they see. Ultimately you'll need to make the call on whether or not your setup is going to pass the opsec of whatever site you are trying to hide from.
For example, when I use an IoT sim card in my 4g modems, my location comes back as Dallas or Chicago. Because my browsers are set to pull location and time zone from IP, it shows my location as Chicago. Pixelscan sees this as consistent and shows all green marks. However, if I were to try to log in to a FB profile from my home city (Denver) with this setup, FB would throw a checkpoint on the first login, since there would be two devices logged in from different parts of the country (the owner of the profile and then me, the person leasing the profile). -> That's an example of why you can't blindly trust these tools. Just use the data to make better decisions.
