I know you aren’t saying that there aren’t people getting sick from Covid but I’ve seen plenty of people here talking about how covid is basically the same as the flu and there’s nothing to worry about which simply isn’t true.
I do agree that taking a vaccine that’s been tested for less than 9 months isn’t ideal, but unfortunately the situation we’re in is far from ideal. We’re almost a year into lockdown and infections are just going up despite quarantine. People are actively opposing rules because they’re sick of the regulations. I honestly don’t see any alternative. Either a majority of the population gets the vaccine so we can get herd immunity or we stay in lockdown indefinitely because as soon as things start opening up, infections are gonna spike even worse than they are now.
Regardless, I’m all for the freedom of speech and discussing ideas here, but there are too many uninformed people here spreading misinformation to the point where it’s causing more harm than good.
See even now, talking with you is valuable and something that I find interesting, moreso than talking to a lot of other people perhaps.
I think that cutting off all discussion about covid is a wasted opportunity to work towards better ways of communicating where honest and fair discussions are the norm instead of tribal, arguing discussions that mostly lack logic or a basis in facts.
I don't know any medical professionals personally, and so for me at least, being able to bounce ideas and info from someone like you is valuable - and I'm just one person. There are thousands of other people that don't ever comment and probably pay a lot of attention to the covid threads looking for answers.
Ok, there's some whacky shit in there sometimes and it breaks down into arguments between people. But that doesn't mean that stopping talking about it is the only option.
If people cared more about being honest when they discuss covid and less about winning then the discussions would actually be productive. I'd be more open to putting rules in place for
how to conduct covid discussions than a binary option of having them as they are or removing them completely.
Surely it's not that hard to collectively come to some reasonable terms everyone can agree on for how to discuss the pandemic and the vaccine, and then if people break those guidelines then everyone can contribute to steering conversations back onto a good path. (
@Zwielicht ?)
It's not that hard - if people drop their preconceptions about each other then everyone could get their way - less bullshit conversations, but people can still get valuable information from guys like
@exodian1 and from other sources.
The main problem is the format of discussions - it's all about conflict from the beginning. It doesn't have to be.
This is exactly the problem.
Posts with no understanding of how these vaccines work spreading information which is wrong.
Something that seems like a problem though is saying "these few people say silly things in relation to a global event affecting everyone's lives, so we should all completely stop talking about it".
Why not put good ideas against bad ideas instead of trying to stop all ideas? (This isn't meant argumentatively, it's a genuine question).