All Threshold Accounts getting suspended

[V]

No one shared with me too

It's been two days only. Try a little harder.

 

[夢市片]

Everything fine for me personally.
The real discussion should be about the longest review time, more than suspensions.

I think people facing suspensions should rethink their setup, and increase its quality.
And please, no mention of things such as altering "canvas fingerprinting/ user agent", because people stating these just rely on the fact that because MLA offers such features it's required to do it (while it's not)

 

[M4DM4X]

Everything fine for me personally.
The real discussion should be about the longest review time, more than suspensions.

I think people facing suspensions should rethink their setup, and increase its quality.
And please, no mention of things such as altering "canvas fingerprinting/ user agent", because people stating these just rely on the fact that because MLA offers such features it's required to do it (while it's not)

After a few accounts created with the same setup you'll be suspended rapidly if you don't change those (canvas, audio, etc).

 

[夢市片]

After a few accounts created with the same setup you'll be suspended rapidly if you don't change those (canvas, audio, etc).

Sorry to tell you that you're wrong and you didn't make enough research on the subject.

Canvas Fingerprinting is partly based on the GPU being used. You generating a random canvas fingerprint that would show you using a really old GPU would make you look more suspicious than somebody else.
That wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canvas_fingerprinting#Uniqueness) shows that Canvas Fingerprinting by itself isn't enough to identify a user.

Then comes audio. Browsers track the amount of audio channels you have on your computer (you can double check on MLA). I highly doubt that having 2 audio channels (most frequent setup) will make you get suspended rapidly. Do you really think that the average user will get suspended because he has two audio channels?

Should I talk about WebGL aswell (also based on GPU) or are the examples above enough?

The browser fingerprint excuse have been used for many years. You could try by yourself and make a in-house solution without relying on MLA and discover that only ONE feature of MLA could be considered crucial. (Not basing this on assumptions, it's been months I'm not using MLA anymore, and I'm not facing any issue with account suspensions (and not talking about only 10 profiles created here)).

Most important rule of thumb is the following: let's imagine you have a gigantic pile of white rice, and in it you have one little piece of brown rice. Which one will stand out the most? The brown rice of course. Well, it's the same with user agent/canvas fingerprinting/webGL/audio channels manipulation. You using an old browser version (that directly points out to MLA btw, as Chrome updates its browser automatically), a unique canvas fingerprint, a unique amount of audio channels aswell as an unusual aspect ratio (who on earth still uses 800x600 monitors nowadays?) will make you way more visible than your neighbor that uses last Chrome version with no altered metrics.

 

[M4DM4X]

Sorry to tell you that you're wrong and you didn't make enough research on the subject.

Canvas Fingerprinting is partly based on the GPU being used. You generating a random canvas fingerprint that would show you using a really old GPU would make you look more suspicious than somebody else.
That wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canvas_fingerprinting#Uniqueness) shows that Canvas Fingerprinting by itself isn't enough to identify a user.

Then comes audio. Browsers track the amount of audio channels you have on your computer (you can double check on MLA). I highly doubt that having 2 audio channels (most frequent setup) will make you get suspended rapidly. Do you really think that the average user will get suspended because he has two audio channels?

Should I talk about WebGL aswell (also based on GPU) or are the examples above enough?

The browser fingerprint excuse have been used for many years. You could try by yourself and make a in-house solution without relying on MLA and discover that only ONE feature of MLA could be considered crucial. (Not basing this on assumptions, it's been months I'm not using MLA anymore, and I'm not facing any issue with account suspensions (and not talking about only 10 profiles created here)).

Most important rule of thumb is the following: let's imagine you have a gigantic pile of white rice, and in it you have one little piece of brown rice. Which one will stand out the most? The brown rice of course. Well, it's the same with user agent/canvas fingerprinting/webGL/audio channels manipulation. You using an old browser version (that directly points out to MLA btw, as Chrome updates its browser automatically), a unique canvas fingerprint, a unique amount of audio channels aswell as an unusual aspect ratio (who on earth still uses 800x600 monitors nowadays?) will make you way more visible than your neighbor that uses last Chrome version with no altered metrics.

At least this is my experience, when I keep my setup the same I am flagged, when I use random fingerprints it's (almost not always of course) fine.
When I begun creating adwords accounts I've been able to create around 10 accounts with the same setup, then when they figured out I was not paying the bills I was not able to create accounts anymore with this setup. So I had to change my fingerprints.

Remaining unique, as your brown rice grain, is not a problem if you keep your fingerprints the same during all the process when creating & using an account. There are addons that change canvas but they randomize it at every http request which is not good.

Concerning audio, webgl, etc, I don't know the exact technical stuff behind but I change them too.

Anyway I am very curious about how you manage to create accounts without changing your fingerprints, this is very cool though.

 

[we1]

You will try anothet method, and diffirent vcc.

 

[夢市片]

Anyway I am very curious about how you manage to create accounts without changing your fingerprints, this is very cool though.

To be honest, I think the most important is and will always be the quality of your payment method/IP address.
Then, it always comes down to what you're doing on the account aswell of course.

 

[M4DM4X]

To be honest, I think the most important is and will always be the quality of your payment method/IP address.
Then, it always comes down to what you're doing on the account aswell of course.

yep I can confirm this.
But I've never changed my CC provider nor my IP provider. That's only when I changed my fingerprints (without changing CC and IPs provider) that I could create accounts again.
However I know you are not saying BS, some other people are also saying they can create accounts again and again from the same machine without changing fingerprints.

EDIT : I also think phone numbers to verify the gg accs are very important in the process

 

[manishsinhacse]

Please don't ask anything more - about it. I just wanna let you know, to push yourself somewhat differently.
I'm still getting 8/10 accounts approved, where it was last 10/10.
It seems, yes they are getting patched - that's why its seems to hard to get approved for those who just read forums tricks, and others methods who buy from others - you need to create your own method - if you really wish to work & go smoothly.