Indexer tool suggestion

[Kingdomobi]

I now have over 1000 links to index, but I still can't tell the best indexer tool I should go for, some say speed-links is good but I still can't testify, never used the service. Peharps if one knows what indexer tool @yakuzaemme used for the giveaway, it should Worth a try

 

[Tikkanen]

I have tested speed links and it does help but it may not meet your expectation if you are looking for great result. The success rate is hardly 25-30%

I have also tested it in different way. What i did is, for 100 web 2.0 contextual links, I did Tier 2/Tier 3 and almost 63-65 of them got indexed in 3 weeks. After waiting for 3 weeks, I used remaining un-indexed links (35 links) to speed links and the result was very poor. After one week of submission, only 2 of them were indexed. It could be that, it got indexed on its own, not because of speed links.

 

[Kingdomobi]

I have tested speed links and it does help but it may not meet your expectation if you are looking for great result. The success rate is hardly 25-30%

I have also tested it in different way. What i did is, for 100 web 2.0 contextual links, I did Tier 2/Tier 3 and almost 63-65 of them got indexed in 3 weeks. After waiting for 3 weeks, I used remaining un-indexed links (35 links) to speed links and the result was very poor. After one week of submission, only 2 of them were indexed. It could be that, it got indexed on its own, not because of speed links.

Thanks mate, any other suggestions?

 

[NO-CLUE-SEO]

Google crawls your links, and then decides if they are worth indexing based on content and domain.
Google then decides they are crap links and does not index.

Only thing that can make google change its mind is to increase the trust factor on those links just like your money site, so you build good quality links to the links you want to index.

 

[Kingdomobi]

Google crawls your links, and then decides if they are worth indexing based on content and domain.
Google then decides they are crap links and does not index.

Only thing that can make google change its mind is to increase the trust factor on those links just like your money site, so you build good quality links to the links you want to index.

Thanks but still doesn't answer my question.


I need a high index ratio Service.

 

[Kaine]

Google crawls your links, and then decides if they are worth indexing based on content and domain.
Google then decides they are crap links and does not index.

Only thing that can make google change its mind is to increase the trust factor on those links just like your money site, so you build good quality links to the links you want to index.

That's exactly it, I couldn't have said it better. And since the update, you have to give Google good quality content if you want it index your links.

Links pointing to a penalized domain are very difficult to index as well.

 

[Kingdomobi]

That's exactly it, I couldn't have said it better. And since the update, you have to give Google good quality content if you want it index your links.

Sorry I didn't specify, mostly are profile Backlinks.

Now how can I index them

 

[Kaine]

Sorry I didn't specify, mostly are profile Backlinks.

Now how can I index them

If there is little content (this is not always the case for profiles) I would rather recommend a good SER blast.

 

[Kingdomobi]

If there is little content (this is not always the case for profiles) I would rather recommend a good SER blast.

Can you explain better, I will appreciate

 

[Kaine]

Can you explain better, I will appreciate

I don't see how to be more explicit, @NO-CLUE-SEO you already explained it very well.

 

[Kingdomobi]

SER blast...?

 

[Ollieri]

, I used remaining un-indexed links (35 links) to speed links and the result was very poor. After one week of submission, only 2 of them were indexed. It could be that, it got indexed on its own, not because of speed links.

Are they all was indexable? As most Web 2.0 is not indexable nowdays. So I think problem is here.

@Kingdomobi just try any service which offers free trial, there are some of them. So you don't loose yours money.

 

[Kingdomobi]

Are they all was indexable? As most Web 2.0 is not indexable nowdays. So I think problem is here.

@Kingdomobi just try any service which offers free trial, there are some of them. So you don't loose yours money.

Examples

 

[hideath]

Examples

1 word man

 

[NO-CLUE-SEO]

Are they all was indexable? As most Web 2.0 is not indexable nowdays. So I think problem is here.

@Kingdomobi just try any service which offers free trial, there are some of them. So you don't loose yours money.

Your quote "Most web2 not indexable", again it will depend on the content. Change the content until it indexes.

I use a lot of web2's to start the website, changing the content, I get a high percentage indexed.

If a web2 does not have the noindex tag on it, and it's a do-follow, it's worth using. If you are just putting spun content on it, respin it until it indexes.

 

[Ollieri]

Your quote "Most web2 not indexable", again it will depend on the content. Change the content until it indexes.

Content doesn't matter if page has noindex or blocked by robots. It is so I have on mind. @Tikkanen said that near 70% was indexed, so in my opinion 30% has high probability that is was not indexable, errors like 500, 404, mobile first indexing on subdomain, different canonical etc. This is what most user do, they try to index no indexable urls without checking.