Is this true what Brian Dean said about Ctr?

Everyone knows it even before Brain Dean said it. The first three results get the most traffic. You can improve it by making changes to titles so it looks more relevant to the user making the search.
 
It varies between niches and search terms, like for instance an obvious example is the CTR for Donald Trump age is super low because the answer is displayed in a snippet/knowledge graph. Whereas some other terms might have a higher than average CTR as people do more clicks for some specific terms and less for others.

So there is those elements, but the first place to start improving CTR is title and meta desc.
 
Every niche and SERP is different. There are so many variables that come into play here. I'm guessing he's averaging this out, but I've seen data that has the #1 spots getting 20% more CTR.
 
Everyone knows it even before Brain Dean said it. The first three results get the most traffic. You can improve it by making changes to titles so it looks more relevant to the user making the search.

What ever i do i got shitty ctr mby i dont know to write it proper :/
 
The pareto principle is in effect here, as with most things in life.

20% of the people ranking on the front page are receiving 80% of the traffic.
 
Sounds about right to me. Of course its an average and will vary depending on niche, keywords and results, but I would say its roughly right.
 
Back
Top