Yes, they are index but they will act as my backlinks when I redirect the expired domain, right? and only the first 3 or 4 sentences are share on web 2.0.If they are indexable in the 2.0, Google may see it as a copy. To check if they are indexed, just do a search in Google with a fragment of that text. If you see the other URL in the search results, I would not waste my time with that content.
Yes, it will be as a copy.
You should understand that only unique and high quality content are good for google
First check is it is indexed or not then rewrite the content.
Absolutely, it will be considered as duplicate/pliagrised content for sure. You might try and spin that very content, subject it to checking at Copyscape or Grammarly and if at least 90% gets reported as unique, go ahead.
But I am getting links from these web 2.0 then why it will be copy? Like read full review here.If the content is already indexed, then yes it will be considered as duplicate content.
I will get the links indirectly, via expried domain, I just want to use the contents.Getting links is alright. The question is whether that link will eventually get flagged. So why do you want to put your work at risk. Try and understand the risk to reward factor.
Its like becoming friends with an anti social element and getting happy with that. But later your inner circle would also abandon you since you are linked with that anti social person. So I would like to distance myself from that individual as soon as I get to know the reality.
@djsobuj Good Luck!
OK I will not do it. Thanks all for help me, I am new at expired domain thing.Good luck.
I think its too much.
want to use expired domain content but those content already share on some web 2.0 with expired domain post URLs. If I buy and redirect the expired domain will Gogle see my content as a copy?