Myst3ry
Elite Member
- Jul 6, 2013
- 1,533
- 1,400
It seems that it came to an end for the guest post farms.
What do you think guys?
Full story at: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/guest-post-manual-actions/351692/
I'm checking BHW often through the day but probably I have missed them all.This has been covered a few times today already.
I'm checking BHW often through the day but probably I have missed them all.
Yes exactly.https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/google-penalties-on-guest-post-articles.1205364/
Then again, having re-read it, nothing that insightful. Definitely warrants more debate.
Yes exactly.
Anyway, I was feeling that it will come to an end for the guest post farms. It's too obvious and they are more like PBNs.
"Google has detected... links that are either unnatural or irrelevant.
So, again, relevancy is the key.
Even if it's not hit by Google, a site with high OBL will provide less link juice. So, definitely Ahrefs check is a must.Always good to take a look in Ahrefs at the outbound links of a guest post site.
I'm not sure if it occurred in this case but many people will get a guest post then spam that guest post with backlinks to boost it thinking it can take the links and is a buffer to their money site.
I'm sure a post like this that gets spammed with backlinks looks unnatural.
This came from a manual review. The Google algorithm is not going to automatically ignore guest post links but "suspicious" posts may start getting flagged for manual reviews.
Finally, the site that purchased the guest post was not directly punished other than having the link devalued. And the pay-to-post site was not deindexed. The link juice was just turned off.
He may still be able to sell guest posts to people who don't really know how they work and don't do their due diligence before paying for a guest post.
The most interesting thing I found in the article was how accurately Google was able to pick out the specific links that were paid out of all the links while ignoring the unpaid links.
I'm not sure if it occurred in this case but many people will get a guest post then spam that guest post with backlinks to boost it thinking it can take the links and is a buffer to their money site.
I'm sure a post like this that gets spammed with backlinks looks unnatural.
Totally agree... forbes is probably the biggest link farm.They should apply this to all the authority sites out there then
Yes but if it's a guest post farm it will be still suspicious.I dont think that this apply to natural, topic related guest posts.
Some webmasters have stated the price for guest posts. Some are using gmail.I'm not sure if it occurred in this case but many people will get a guest post then spam that guest post with backlinks to boost it thinking it can take the links and is a buffer to their money site.
I'm sure a post like this that gets spammed with backlinks looks unnatural.
This came from a manual review. The Google algorithm is not going to automatically ignore guest post links but "suspicious" posts may start getting flagged for manual reviews.
Finally, the site that purchased the guest post was not directly punished other than having the link devalued. And the pay-to-post site was not deindexed. The link juice was just turned off.
He may still be able to sell guest posts to people who don't really know how they work and don't do their due diligence before paying for a guest post.
The most interesting thing I found in the article was how accurately Google was able to pick out the specific links that were paid out of all the links while ignoring the unpaid links.
How will the buyer of the links know that the site link has lost power?
Carefully check on Ahrefs before buying/acquiring guest posts. If it's guest post farm then better stay away.Ditto on how will a buyer know if a publisher site is devalued.
The OBL from whole website, not just from the actual guest post. The OBL from whole website tells that the site is actually a guest post farm.Yes absolutely, now guest post has high risk when more OBL link to irrelevant site and that makes link profile abnormal. Probably, no link power will be passed to linking site. But the matter is how we do it. Outbound links with relevancy is important and even if you want to link to other site(not much), it should be done logically. Link only when it is reasonable and necessary and Diversify link profile to be safe.
It has google penalty proof. That's why I decided to share it.Totally agree... forbes is probably the biggest link farm.
It has been happening for ages where google de-indexes link farms; nothing new here.
to OP: searchenginejournal? seriously? they post a lot of junk with barely any proof and the writing is really bad. 1 website got penalised and they make a huge story out of it... so searchenginejournal.