Secret pagerank
- Thread starter tar729
- Start date
- Status
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
Google hides the structure of search queries from you in the scheduler. specifically, so that you can't build a semantic graph and find out what the standard should be. The scheduler gives you an adjusted sequence to apply to your site. You should be able to get the desired sequences by managing the scheduler settings. Then the scheduler will arrange the graph for you as needed.
ranga
Senior Member
- Aug 9, 2009
- 800
- 628
OK the OP is tough to follow due to language issues. But from what I gather, he is talking about when symantically relevant websites & urls link to each other both get link benefits. So if a person has 2 or more sites writing in similar niche and they interlink semantically in some predefined structures then both will get link benefit from it, which can be used to juice up both the sites in search engines.
reciprocal link building penalties are not applicable if they are not built using link farms. Infact they should increase semantic relavance of the sites. See this link https://ahrefs.com/blog/reciprocal-links/
reciprocal link building penalties are not applicable if they are not built using link farms. Infact they should increase semantic relavance of the sites. See this link https://ahrefs.com/blog/reciprocal-links/
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
1. Google does not have a database of link farms. this method of evaluating spam links is not effective. the only difference between a spam link and a non-spam link is its weight. This solution is much more effective and correct. Yandex abandoned the link farm ban technology back in 2007. Google did this 5 years later. You have outdated information.
2. the exception of site adulation is a separate issue in building SEO transistors.
3. the key issue is that due to the difference in the evaluation of different structures, an algorithmic cycle is created in positive feedback. I'm afraid to write the same thing in different words so as not to confuse you. You need to pay attention to the nature of cycles. Relevance overclocking works in a loop. Under certain conditions, you need to create fine-tuning the semantics of both sites that participate in this.
- Nov 12, 2012
- 1,563
- 893
You are either very crazy or a genius.. Its one of those 2..
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
I don't say anything supernatural or incomprehensible. All this is quite easy to understand, if you exclude translation problems. I recommend that you go to a professional translator yourself and study this material together with him. I'm sure you won't find anything supernatural in the technology. And if you continue to discuss the blind with the deaf, which I am more and more reminded of our attempts, then very soon everyone in this thread will become mad. So we need to stop doing this. Search for the translator and invite here in the thread
Last edited:
I used to know a couple russian guys, but I don't remember who they were lol.
Pretty interesting stuff, man.
This is what lots of people miss to gain an edge at SERPs.
triplecheeze
Newbie
- Sep 23, 2014
- 31
- 10
He is talking about the knowledge graph + google algorithm that "thank" you (site 1) for referring relevant external source (site 2)
batiatus
Regular Member
- May 8, 2011
- 284
- 347
OP I'm from Turkey so we also got Yandex going here and it's pretty strong competitor of Google in Turkish WWW.
So where do you gather these data which Google doesn't has? I've been using Yandex wordstat tool in Yandex Direct.
I did not see any different metrics then Google Adwords Keyword Planner.
So where do you gather these data which Google doesn't has? I've been using Yandex wordstat tool in Yandex Direct.
I did not see any different metrics then Google Adwords Keyword Planner.
D
Deleted member 657006
Guest
I agree with everything your saying in theory.
but and there a big but.
Google is ai now so google algo is changed in split seconds as it exploited.
so what you no now not what being used (( fact))
exploited could mean.
spam
to many links
to many keywords
to many matching
to precise SEO.
the ai will change when seeing anything to close to it working.
the only 1 true fact is backlinks from other powerful websites pointing to your website increase indexing.
why pbn will always increase the position.
knowing the full algo inside out will just cause the ai rewrite its indexing.
that simple.
the only way to beat the algo is use SEO proven strategies like pbn's
because the ai can write an indexing method in light speed, understanding the theory of how your indexed is not the same as being number 1 indexed because of ai technology
like I said many times a ai would need to challenge google ai to get positioned at top of the Google algo, but each ai will fight to the end , backlinks pbn in real life still win.
even maths scientists can not work google ai out to get proper results but backlinks/pbn do the trick
when you look at seo to get a website indexed you need to think out the box and not fall into any statistic strategy .
what works works .
but and there a big but.
Google is ai now so google algo is changed in split seconds as it exploited.
so what you no now not what being used (( fact))
exploited could mean.
spam
to many links
to many keywords
to many matching
to precise SEO.
the ai will change when seeing anything to close to it working.
the only 1 true fact is backlinks from other powerful websites pointing to your website increase indexing.
why pbn will always increase the position.
knowing the full algo inside out will just cause the ai rewrite its indexing.
that simple.
the only way to beat the algo is use SEO proven strategies like pbn's
because the ai can write an indexing method in light speed, understanding the theory of how your indexed is not the same as being number 1 indexed because of ai technology
like I said many times a ai would need to challenge google ai to get positioned at top of the Google algo, but each ai will fight to the end , backlinks pbn in real life still win.
even maths scientists can not work google ai out to get proper results but backlinks/pbn do the trick
when you look at seo to get a website indexed you need to think out the box and not fall into any statistic strategy .
what works works .
Last edited by a moderator:
Matheus Moreira
Power Member
- Jul 14, 2017
- 753
- 405
Which means that if i have 100 sites on tier 1, i should interlink all of them like crazy and it will be fine? I stopped doing that long time ago because of course its an obvious footprint... didnt notice any advantages either.
ranga
Senior Member
- Aug 9, 2009
- 800
- 628
don't want to hijack OPs thread, but if all your sites are in same niche and if the links are semantically related to the article, then you should interlink without doing something spammy.
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
natural links between sites in the same subject are a cross-section of their real business relationships. These structures are clearly visible in the graph of these links and are visible to search systems. Chaotic links are immediately visible and appropriate spam checks are applied to them.
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
what's there to interrupt? there is no way without an interpreter at this stage.
Matheus Moreira
Power Member
- Jul 14, 2017
- 753
- 405
Ok, so lets think about these cenarios:
First: Tier 1 sites do not interlink and each tier 1 receives individual tier 2s (the traditional approach - thats what i have been doing lately)
Second: Tier 1 sites interlink with each other and each tier 1 receives individual tier 2
Third: Tier 1 sites interlink with each other and tier 2s also interlink with each other
Fourth: Just create hundreds of tier 1 sites and interlink them all, forget about tier 2
Which cenario do you pick as the strongest?
Matheus Moreira
Power Member
- Jul 14, 2017
- 753
- 405
Please define "chaotic links".
If the content is related and the keywords are there, even if its spammy, can it be considered chaotic?
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
I'm afraid you misunderstand what the "thank you"bonus is for. One relevance is not enough to get this bonus. We also need utility. If you link to a copy of the content, you will not receive any bonus. Google calculates the difference in meaning, and only if one page is a complement to another in meaning, we can talk about the calculated bonus. However, the relevance of both pages may be the same.
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
if the content is linked to each other without taking into account the vector of development of natural interest in accordance with the nature of decision-making on stereotypes...then it will be regarded by Google as a link spam. You forget that all ranking is based on directed graphs. They reflect these correct vectors of links and correct texts in these links. If you link your sites without taking this into account, you will automatically become a black optimization method. If you have a real site structure and a real business, then you will make all the links in the right places and will not put too much. Everything will correspond to the natural distribution.
- Status