Stop building black hat links

it is not what you do, it's how you do it. I have been doing all the things you said above and my clients' site still rank well.
 
lol.. This whole "links need traffic thing". It doesn't even make sense from a search engine standpoint. It always comes from people who have no real experience with pbns, but like to read blog posts.

It's a chicken and egg.

Search engine ranks pages with links from other pages with traffic. What comes first? Traffic can't be a ranking factor because traffic IS the reward from other ranking factors. It's programmatically impossible and it would break the entire algorithm in so many ways. It would create loops of unfair advantage for already ranking sites.

And additionally, traffic is irrelevant. You could have an amazing, super strong, super authoritative site in the scientific domain with research papers.. It won't have much traffic. Traffic is related to relevance/content, not strength. There's absolutely no reason why a site couldn't be super authoritative but have almost no traffic.

If Google made traffic a search ranking factor they would be taking a natural system, the world wide web, and applying their own output from that natural system as a way to measure output. It's nonsensical. Traffic is output. Ranking factors are input.
 
Blackhat links still work, do they pose a greater risk than whitehat links? Maybe, but that does not mean they cannot be part of a viable business model, even in today's environment.

Getting links 100% naturally is a very slow and at times expensive process, so while you are waiting years for a project to take off the whitehat way, you me be making money off of another project in 6 months with blackhat methods, while spending less.

The truth is that each method has it cons and pros and different risk levels, both can work, which one you choose is just a matter of personal preference and not a right or wrong way argument.
 
PBNs are not all bad.. It proves helpful when done right. So be cautious while choosing the service provider.
 
WEB 2.0 Links are useful and white hat if you know how to do them well...
 
I learn someone here thanks for Your Details with Some points
 
I'll just keep making money with shitty "SEO packages" and PBN links, thanks anyway.
 
I think I am happy wit shitty links and getting decent results. Thanks for your advice.
 
Good luck spending thousands of dollars on high quality news links and long term SEO strategies to get blown out the water by some one armed black hat SEO guy who outranked you with his 1 page shitty site.

Google can kill your traffic, regardless of whether it is black hat or white hat SEO. Been there, done that.
 
Yes stop and start selling noodles offline. At least you won't make a new thread on every Google update.
 
Strange. I get Millions of visits with duplicated content + pbn shitty links + web 2.0 links. Maybe i'm doing something wrong
are they linked directed to your money site? (i mean the backinks)
 
I kind of agree with the op. long term projects require long term solutions. Not all projects necessarily need a clean whitehat strategy, but a lot do. Its fine if you use blackhat links, but then treat them like they are and don't complain when your site tanks a year later.
 
I kind of agree with the op. long term projects require long term solutions. Not all projects necessarily need a clean whitehat strategy, but a lot do. Its fine if you use blackhat links, but then treat them like they are and don't complain when your site tanks a year later.


I was just about to buy a few of these..., how could this tank the site?

Do you have any recommendations of the most reliable backlink service on BHW?
 
Back
Top