What all you consider as web 2.0 foot prints?

I dont think so, but i dont see why would yo do that.

Well, I do so. And someone told me it's a big footprint his site will be penalized.

If this is true, I believe I have to rethink about my working way.
 
Same video, same pictures, same property name (in URL), same IP

Same YT video, different images, keywords in name of URL, different ip.

Also, if I create a web 2.0 on tumblr from NY, and I create one on yola from NY same ip, how google will identify this?
 
Don't focus too much on this. Web 2.0s have been devaluated a lot. I remember in 2013, where I could make some HQ Web 2.0s and rank my website. Since 2016 thats not working anymore. Don't get me wrong, they are still important and good for link diversity, but don't spend too much time and effort to create them. The effort won't be worth the result.
 
Don't focus too much on this. Web 2.0s have been devaluated a lot. I remember in 2013, where I could make some HQ Web 2.0s and rank my website. Since 2016 thats not working anymore. Don't get me wrong, they are still important and good for link diversity, but don't spend too much time and effort to create them. The effort won't be worth the result.

Did you even read the thread? He runs a Web 2.0 creation service.
 
Don't focus too much on this. Web 2.0s have been devaluated a lot. I remember in 2013, where I could make some HQ Web 2.0s and rank my website. Since 2016 thats not working anymore. Don't get me wrong, they are still important and good for link diversity, but don't spend too much time and effort to create them. The effort won't be worth the result.
You are right, but Web 2.0s are the cheapest(free) quality links that a person could get.

I love em, and atm im warming up like 400 TUMBLRS PA50 before i drop the links.
 
Don't focus too much on this. Web 2.0s have been devaluated a lot. I remember in 2013, where I could make some HQ Web 2.0s and rank my website. Since 2016 thats not working anymore. Don't get me wrong, they are still important and good for link diversity, but don't spend too much time and effort to create them. The effort won't be worth the result.

I feel you don't even tried them in 2019
 
Did you even read the thread? He runs a Web 2.0 creation service.
Oh, just saw the link in his signature. I was only reading the initial question and a few replies.

The biggest footprints are the same ip, same account (like many web 2.0 on the same wordpress/blogger/tumblr/etc. account), the same content (keep it as unique as possible) and the same linking patterns. I wouldn't necessarily say the same videos and images are a footprint, but it should be diversified.

But in my opinion the most important is the velocity. Don't build 30 links in one day. Build a few links per week here and then. Keep everything as natural as possible. I know for a service its kinda difficult.


I feel you don't even tried them in 2019

I tried them, but I didn't expect you to agree with me, since you offer this service. In the end it all comes down to the quality and uniqueness of the web 2.0. For example automated web 2.0 are worth shit and useless.
 
I tried them, but I didn't expect you to agree with me, since you offer this service. In the end it all comes down to the quality and uniqueness of the web 2.0. For example automated web 2.0 are worth shit and useless.

I agree. Quality and authority are two things. Authority of new blogger, tumblr, weebly, yola is neutral these days, like a brand new domain. And I believe that is after 2015-16 update.
 
Back
Top