Shadeofblack
Power Member
- Dec 26, 2011
- 577
- 175
Yo John
Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter jstover77
- Start date
- Status
VeryLuckyI
Junior Member
- Apr 6, 2008
- 101
- 48
Ready to place the order, sent you PM please respond ASAP.
VeryLuckyI
Junior Member
- Apr 6, 2008
- 101
- 48
Order #AFF568DF placed
Unreliable Witness
Senior Member
- Apr 21, 2016
- 837
- 627
REVIEW:
I've been intrigued by this service since it launched (I was the first person to ask for a sample). I held back from ordering because I wasn't entirely sure whether Google would be able to determine that these were paid for.
I bit the bullet about a month ago and ordered 2 RD400 links as a test order.
@jstover77 has been great throughout - quick to respond to questions, helpful in setting up my order, and happy to resend my report after I accidentally deleted it.
Both links are placed on 500 RD domains (according to ahrefs), so I've been given a slight upgrade there.
They have the anchor text I specified, and are on articles that are about the same topic as the target page (very high topical relevance although in a different niche).
The links are in the first few paragraphs of the articles, so a prime position in terms of link juice being passed. There are other links within the articles so mine don't look out of place.
The pages have recently been re-indexed by Google, and the links are showing in Google's cache.
The articles were written a while back (as you would expect) and are unlikely to be read often nowadays. Therefore, these links are unlikely to generate traffic. I knew this when I ordered, and John also mentioned it before I ordered. The reason to use these links is to raise authority and to pass juice from high RD domains.
The TAT was 3 weeks. I would have preferred for it to be less (two would be OK), but I know John wasn't ready for the popularity of this service. I'd hope that in time, he'd be able to reduce the TAT.
I don't believe that Google would be able to tell whether these links were paid for. The anchor text of the links fits within the articles seamlessly. The target page is relevant to the article and could be legitimately linked to.
Nor do I believe that the risk of these links being taken down at a later date is any greater than for traditional guest posts. These are well placed links that (in my opinion) do not detract from the original article.
It is only a week since these were delivered. However, given the topical relevance of the pages on which the links were placed, and the RD of both, I'd be very surprised if I didn't get a SERP rise.
If niche edits can form part of your strategy, I'd highly recommend this service.
I've been intrigued by this service since it launched (I was the first person to ask for a sample). I held back from ordering because I wasn't entirely sure whether Google would be able to determine that these were paid for.
I bit the bullet about a month ago and ordered 2 RD400 links as a test order.
@jstover77 has been great throughout - quick to respond to questions, helpful in setting up my order, and happy to resend my report after I accidentally deleted it.
Both links are placed on 500 RD domains (according to ahrefs), so I've been given a slight upgrade there.
They have the anchor text I specified, and are on articles that are about the same topic as the target page (very high topical relevance although in a different niche).
The links are in the first few paragraphs of the articles, so a prime position in terms of link juice being passed. There are other links within the articles so mine don't look out of place.
The pages have recently been re-indexed by Google, and the links are showing in Google's cache.
The articles were written a while back (as you would expect) and are unlikely to be read often nowadays. Therefore, these links are unlikely to generate traffic. I knew this when I ordered, and John also mentioned it before I ordered. The reason to use these links is to raise authority and to pass juice from high RD domains.
The TAT was 3 weeks. I would have preferred for it to be less (two would be OK), but I know John wasn't ready for the popularity of this service. I'd hope that in time, he'd be able to reduce the TAT.
I don't believe that Google would be able to tell whether these links were paid for. The anchor text of the links fits within the articles seamlessly. The target page is relevant to the article and could be legitimately linked to.
Nor do I believe that the risk of these links being taken down at a later date is any greater than for traditional guest posts. These are well placed links that (in my opinion) do not detract from the original article.
It is only a week since these were delivered. However, given the topical relevance of the pages on which the links were placed, and the RD of both, I'd be very surprised if I didn't get a SERP rise.
If niche edits can form part of your strategy, I'd highly recommend this service.
- Feb 27, 2009
- 3,219
- 4,935
Got it. Assigned.
Responding to all the above.
Got it. Assigned.
Thanks so much for the review guys. Glad you're happy with the service!
VeryLuckyI
Junior Member
- Apr 6, 2008
- 101
- 48
Sent you a question through PM regarding new order I want to place, please respond ASAP
VeryLuckyI
Junior Member
- Apr 6, 2008
- 101
- 48
Placed Order#808593FE
efendyyy35
Regular Member
- Jan 31, 2015
- 439
- 135
sample page for travel niche please
xyzrxyz
Power Member
- Aug 6, 2008
- 679
- 274
is my order finished ? any report?
- Feb 27, 2009
- 3,219
- 4,935
Sent to everyone above.
Got it, assigned.
Sent you a PM.
Sent. Go back a few pages, there are over 10 ranking screenshots of current clients rankings.
xyzrxyz
Power Member
- Aug 6, 2008
- 679
- 274
Thanks for the report...
Chicilikit
Supreme Member
- Dec 21, 2010
- 1,298
- 401
Yo John
NordlandST
Junior Member
- Sep 18, 2016
- 193
- 97
Yo John
Please send me samples of travel niches
Please send me samples of travel niches
- Feb 27, 2009
- 3,219
- 4,935
You got it man.
Sent.
New!
I'm now offering links filtered by DR. You can see them on the buy now page here:
- Status