Getting easy backlinks

[nossie]

These blogs where TLJ posts need more serious linkjuice. You should focus on improving that rockingrobin. All those blogs have "not yet ranked by google" (pr0) or are sandboxed/not indexed.

I'm using this service for 2-3 months now and seeing very little to no results for very low competitive keywords. (sites that only use TLJ).

 

[rockinrobin]

These blogs where TLJ posts need more serious linkjuice. You should focus on improving that rockingrobin.

This is an area of focus. Having said that, for the most part it is the PR of the page not the site that counts. A post on a high PR blog but that has no page rank on the page is not worth more than a post on a low PR blog. There are posts on hellodaddio.com that are ranking quite well for their keyword.

All those blogs have "not yet ranked by google" (pr0) or are sandboxed/not indexed.

Not indexed and PR0 are not the same thing. We have pages that rank well for their keywords that have no PR.

I'm using this service for 2-3 months now and seeing very little to no results for very low competitive keywords. (sites that only use TLJ).

There are far too many variables for you to pin this on one of them. There are also several accounts on this thread by users with very good results using only or mostly TLJ. For example: http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...39-getting-easy-backlinks-10.html#post1161465
If you contact support so we know who you are, we can look at your campaigns and maybe make some suggestions.

Also, here is a good video on the subject of backlink checking:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRUfHLfMqGU

 

[HeyJay29]

At the risk of helping direct competitors I will add to this discussion that I virtually never check backlinks in this context. The algos are purposely flawed and I know this even without watching the above video. We also know that every link carries a different ranking value and that value probably varies week to week even within the same search engine.

The bottom is line is do your rankings improve? Is your site seo'd properly to take advantage of the links? (I've seen some pretty stupid stuff out there! You probably have, too.) Personally I ignore backlinks being shown. I go by results and I have clients that are very, very happy. TLJ is one of my major tools.

Now I go back into hiding. My clients don't want more knowledgeable competition.

 

[smartalex4]

Since rockinrobin used my post an example of the merits of TLJ, I wanted to post a follow up on my results.

I am no longer #7 on page 1...I am now #5 out of 22,600,000 results!

 

[TayaTaya]

hm... sounds interesting...
but it has PR 0... IMHO, don't you think it would be wise to promote yourself first? I mean that would make sense to me... or show an example of a blog that the founder of the application had such a great success with ...
plus only 2 links indexed on google? One from DPF and one from warriorforums?
The idea sounds interesting anyway... Thanks.

 

[rockinrobin]

Some unwarranted assumptions are being made here.
1) You are assuming that PR has anything to do with anything. It doesn't.
2) The founder is busy improving his product. He makes picks and shovels. He is too busy helping his customers dig for gold to do any digging himself.
3) You do not know how many links are indexed by Google. No one does. Less than 1% of them show up in a link query.
4) You are assuming that it should be possible to find or locate any links created by TLJ. Why so? 80% of them are indirect.

The only thing that matters is results. The rest is idle speculation. Your post was intersting anyway... Thanks.

hm... sounds interesting...
but it has PR 0... IMHO, don't you think it would be wise to promote yourself first? I mean that would make sense to me... or show an example of a blog that the founder of the application had such a great success with ...
plus only 2 links indexed on google? One from DPF and one from warriorforums?
The idea sounds interesting anyway... Thanks.

 

[Thewhere]

I'm on board so far it was pretty easy setting up. My only thing is Spyntax. Any Spyntax experts wanna make edits to my articles so they spin well?? Let me know.

 

[bosserik]

I'm on board so far it was pretty easy setting up. My only thing is Spyntax. Any Spyntax experts wanna make edits to my articles so they spin well?? Let me know.

Yes, same here. I just don't have the time to write my campaigns. If I could outsource this, the service would be a hit for me. Are there any good writers out there that are willing to manage campaigns like this?

 

[rockinrobin]

I can't help you with actually writing your campaign text, but I strongly urge you to consider Magic Article Rewriter to create the spyntax. It lists synomyms and creates correct spyntax, even nested spyntax by just pointing and clicking.

 

[Abstroose]

I'm very interested in using this service, however I was previously considering using a Link Wheel service to build backlinks for my blog. Am I right to assume that using TLJ will pretty much make a Link Wheel ineffective?

Also, could I create seperate campaigns to produce deep links? Since my blog covers various diverse topics. IE.

Campaign#1 - site.com/sports
Campaign#2 - site.com/music
Campaign#3 - site.com/poetry

Would this be possible?

 

[ecavalli]

It seems to be a great work. I'll trying it soon.

 

[MoGreen]

So what is the reason behind each member having to create 10 accounts? couldn't you guys just do this yourself and changing ip's?

 

[truthgladiator]

I've been a member for about 3 months. It does work. It's one of the few products online that I've come across that actually does what it advertises. I've got one site that has been as high as #2 in Google. I have now a number of #1 rankings on long-tail keywords and my main money site went from about #165 to #13. It now hovers around #11 and #15 although it's been as high as #8 in Google.

Yes, it really does work. I recommend it. It's also brain-dead easy to set up. If you follow the directions, you'll be fine. Trust me, it's not complicated.

BTW, there is no reason it would not work for ecommerce sites. Plus, deep linking is something I do too. I link to a site page within the site on many campaigns and it works great. Again, trust me, it's not complicated. Setting up the campaigns, if you do it right, takes some time and care, but from then on, it's automatic.

 

[kodiak255]

linkjuicer website appears to be down


nm - back up now

 

[callmybluff]

just signed up for linkjuicer and instantly deactivated my subscription...way to complicated for me

 

[alamada]

Thanks...

 

[tomoenage]

On the site it mentions that you can get sandboxed for building to many links. As far what ive always been advised is that you can get sanboxed/banned for building to many links to a site. If it was possible then you could easily have a competitor sandboxed/banned by sending them 1000s of spammed low quality links. Im a bit concenred that the TLJ says that. this is not too say that is not better to builds like naturally, but I dont see how building them "unnaturally" could lead to real penalties?

 

[cwongwh]

any discounts for bhw members?
Posted via Mobile Device

 

[rockinrobin]

Thanks for pointing this out. It is not properly explained on that page, and besides I've learned a lot since I wrote that. I will correct it.

First you cannot damage your site trough links according to the most recognized experts for the reasons you mentioned. All you can do is get zero value from those links. What can happen is you get value from the links, then one day G sees what is going on and you don't get value. Your ranking drops from page 1 to page X.

There is a social media slap according to some experts and this is what the paragraph in question is referring to. If ALL your links are from SM sites, G will discount them heavily, but I no longer believe that it will get you sandboxed. I did get a site deindexed after two weeks of page 1, and all the links were from SM sites. I may never know why.

Finally, what I am trying to get across is that natural is better. The more natural your link building appears, more unique text, more unique sm accounts lots of non-sm links, natural link velocity etc etc the better it is. TLJ does its best to enforce this by limiting the daily links per url and encouraging proper use of spyntax. Still some users get it and some don't. Again, thanks for your input.

On the site it mentions that you can get sandboxed for building to many links. As far what ive always been advised is that you can get sanboxed/banned for building to many links to a site. If it was possible then you could easily have a competitor sandboxed/banned by sending them 1000s of spammed low quality links. Im a bit concenred that the TLJ says that. this is not too say that is not better to builds like naturally, but I dont see how building them "unnaturally" could lead to real penalties?

 

[sparksue]

Thanks for pointing this out. It is not properly explained on that page, and besides I've learned a lot since I wrote that. I will correct it.

First you cannot damage your site trough links according to the most recognized experts for the reasons you mentioned. All you can do is get zero value from those links. What can happen is you get value from the links, then one day G sees what is going on and you don't get value. Your ranking drops from page 1 to page X.

There is a social media slap according to some experts and this is what the paragraph in question is referring to. If ALL your links are from SM sites, G will discount them heavily, but I no longer believe that it will get you sandboxed. I did get a site deindexed after two weeks of page 1, and all the links were from SM sites. I may never know why.

Finally, what I am trying to get across is that natural is better. The more natural your link building appears, more unique text, more unique sm accounts lots of non-sm links, natural link velocity etc etc the better it is. TLJ does its best to enforce this by limiting the daily links per url and encouraging proper use of spyntax. Still some users get it and some don't. Again, thanks for your input.

Hey rockinrobin!

Really thanks for solving one of my biggest question on sandbox or even devalue the link! I think what you say really hit me and take alot of sense.

Especially - "All you can do is get zero value from those links." This does make sense which is why competition can't really kill you unless we did something wrong.

This speak the reason why my site ranking drop alot without getting sandbox. I think if they notice the pattern are the same. They will totaly devalue of what you been doing instead of sandboxed your site.

Will be taking note of this in my iphone so that i can re-read and remember this important point. Thanks a million!!