Which is better PBN or web 2.0?

Depend on factors, rank for PBN and web 2.0

If web 2.0s are old, ranked. I will love web 2.0

Because we know BPN can die anytime
 
Pbn, fresh web 2.0 have very little ranking juice unless you boost them
 
aged Web 2.0 for sure, it's all for free, all you need is scrapebox.
 
Quality PBN with Good Da will boost your site
 
your own PBN that is not based on web 2.0!

boosting: treating your PBN as your money site. send relevant backlinks to it. what ever you do not ever use scrapebox or gsa to send backlinks to tier 1 (PBN).

also, building social media accounts for your PBN really helps. you can then send shitty backlinks (GSA) to those social media accounts. Or better yet create url shortners towards your social media account and then blast those url shortners with scrapebox and gsa.

follow threads from @Ozzyzig . he has a service for this and also he has a case study on this few years ago. those url shortners do really help when they used correctly in your arsenal.
 
Last edited:
Web2.0 is good if you treat them like real sites with up to date content and backlinks more importantly the traffic :). Where as PBN is risky and give instant boost but the best practice is to use all types of effective backlinks to make your ,money site last long and you can handle the penality lateron whether manual or algo based.

Just my 2 cents :)
 
i managed to rank local sites with only aged web 2.0's. more competitive niches however would require a powered PBN
 
Back
Top