Is Porn upload méthode Stills working?

LordCameltoe said:
You guys do realize that Adrian posted that method just to get referrals right? Its not something you're going to make any long term money with.
Click to expand...
Is not his method and reupload work for long term as video get shared.
 
Advertise on BHW
lookzor said:
Nope you fully misunderstood me, and those that help run programs aren't always that clued into what's possible and what isn't, been doing this myself years too. Specifically, if you re-upload you aren't just going to earn beer money, provided you do it correctly. Not necessarily a new twist but do so in a manner that your videos stick across all tube sites.

Granted, I'm assuming you're directing it at the many who do it wrong, spam accounts, have no forward thinking and generally get accounts banned or don't best use the traffic they do get properly (send them to CPA smartlinks). They don't match up the niche, they don't send to revshare programs or their own, and look for a quick buck.

What I meant is that the porn re-upload method in its essence isn't dead (watermarking, it does drive traffic, does it not?). I also referenced content partners in the sense that they become content partners for the rights to take up real estate on the pages they occupy on tube sites, much like you try as a porn re-uploader as much as possible by watermarking, plugging it in the title and description if possible (plus intro/outro's) to take up some real estate yourself. Meaning, if it didn't work to drive traffic they wouldn't be doing it.

Now, if you mean porn re-uploading the way Adrian specifically explains it is much harder to do and scale nowadays, then sure I agree, but not impossible either.

But, again if we strip it down to its most basic form:

Upload porn > watermark (title/description if possible) > traffic goes to said address > $$$. It works. The issue comes if you get accounts banned and lose videos or don't use the traffic to profit long term from it.

Do you not agree?
Click to expand...

You are right. I am directing it towards those that create spam accounts. The topic of this thread is Adrian's method. My argument is that those that are doing it are wasting their time. I agree with you that if you go about it the smart way (and add a great twist), it can make decent money. However, that is not what most people on this board will do.
 
LordCameltoe said:
You are right. I am directing it towards those that create spam accounts. The topic of this thread is Adrian's method. My argument is that those that are doing it are wasting their time. I agree with you that if you go about it the smart way (and add a great twist), it can make decent money. However, that is not what most people on this board will do.
Click to expand...
There's no money for "most people" in all methods. 1000 people working on this method. 5-10 will make decent money. They have their own twists. it's the same with Dropshipping, Building niche site, Amazon FBA....
 
LordCameltoe said:
You are right. I am directing it towards those that create spam accounts. The topic of this thread is Adrian's method. My argument is that those that are doing it are wasting their time. I agree with you that if you go about it the smart way (and add a great twist), it can make decent money. However, that is not what most people on this board will do.
Click to expand...

That I can agree on :) If they stick to doing it specifically the way he explains!
 
loopoo said:
How much is "decent money" from this method for both of you?
Click to expand...

Back in 2010 & 2011, I knew a guy making $50k a month spamming tubes. He eventually got banned everywhere. I'm not sure if he is still actively doing uploads today.

Today, I can only think of a few clever affiliates that might make $20k a month or more with the porn re-upload method. Others are making beer money ($100 or less). There is a HUGE earning gap between the top level uploaders and the rest who are spamming.
 
LordCameltoe said:
Back in 2010 & 2011, I knew a guy making $50k a month spamming tubes. He eventually got banned everywhere. I'm not sure if he is still actively doing uploads today.

Today, I can only think of a few clever affiliates that might make $20k a month or more with the porn re-upload method.
Click to expand...
They have some private soft, right? Because doing this manually or with market soft is unreal.
Indeed 10 years ago this was a gold mine, cause tubes were unprepared for this, now they have a lot of antispam crap.
What CPA this 50k dude used?
 
loopoo said:
They have some private soft, right? Because doing this manually or with market soft is unreal.
Indeed 10 years ago this was a gold mine, cause tubes were unprepared for this, now they have a lot of antispam crap.
What CPA this 50k dude used?
Click to expand...

Yeah he had his own custom software. He used multiple monetization solutions.
 
$30 (3 days) - good result! What the problem? Try to improve this method. Maybe you can do $30 a day.
 
nowadays, it is getting very tough to re upload, i think $30/ day is also handsome earning.
 
$30 is good for the beginning.... if you keep uploading and working in the end you will earn much more.
it's not realistic to get rich from this method overnight
 
lookzor said:
Nope you fully misunderstood me, and those that help run programs aren't always that clued into what's possible and what isn't, been doing this myself years too. Specifically, if you re-upload you aren't just going to earn beer money, provided you do it correctly. Not necessarily a new twist but do so in a manner that your videos stick across all tube sites.

Granted, I'm assuming you're directing it at the many who do it wrong, spam accounts, have no forward thinking and generally get accounts banned or don't best use the traffic they do get properly (send them to CPA smartlinks). They don't match up the niche, they don't send to revshare programs or their own, and look for a quick buck.

What I meant is that the porn re-upload method in its essence isn't dead (watermarking, it does drive traffic, does it not?). I also referenced content partners in the sense that they become content partners for the rights to take up real estate on the pages they occupy on tube sites, much like you try as a porn re-uploader as much as possible by watermarking, plugging it in the title and description if possible (plus intro/outro's) to take up some real estate yourself. Meaning, if it didn't work to drive traffic they wouldn't be doing it.

Now, if you mean porn re-uploading the way Adrian specifically explains it is much harder to do and scale nowadays, then sure I agree, but not impossible either.

But, again if we strip it down to its most basic form:

Upload porn > watermark (title/description if possible) > traffic goes to said address > $$$. It works. The issue comes if you get accounts banned and lose videos or don't use the traffic to profit long term from it.

Do you not agree?
Click to expand...

For those interested I created an entire thread about set up and best practices if anybody is having problems with it:

https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/re-upload-porn-method-best-practices.1062732/
 
I making 100 usd per day with adult upload method
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top