Is Porn upload méthode Stills working?
- Thread starter Rhrich
- Start date
lastsentinel
Newbie
- Jul 19, 2011
- 17
- 5
but for 3 days I've made only $30
LOL some people don't even make this much and you're asking if the method is working??? What's wrong with you
LOL some people don't even make this much and you're asking if the method is working??? What's wrong with you
antihero11
Regular Member
- Mar 25, 2014
- 421
- 133
Off course. Porn is the most evergreen niche
loopoo
Junior Member
- Sep 20, 2016
- 194
- 69
What CPA?
D
Deleted member 719276
Guest
Doesn't matter, could be Adverten, Crakrevenue, imonetizeit etc. these 3 are converting good for me.
mhtro
BANNED
- Dec 3, 2017
- 1,411
- 1,892
You doing porn stuff? Bad doggo!!
D
Deleted member 719276
Guest
no deer NO! it's unicorn stuff no porn
Skankhunt Shwaggins
BANNED
- Jun 3, 2018
- 23
- 20
$30 is already more than most make lol so it's working and now you need to tweak it and scale it. Check out @Billy Batts adult guides in the money section, I'm sure you can use some of that to do some inspiration.
blackh4t
Power Member
- Jan 30, 2009
- 735
- 251
stacksavings
Newbie
- Sep 10, 2018
- 14
- 0
What is that metod i want to try to earn money with that haah
Tositirane
Junior Member
- Oct 27, 2017
- 120
- 18
I don't trust this too. can you sir show us any screenshoot ?
HookUPcom2
Regular Member
- Dec 15, 2009
- 351
- 142
Whether or not this post is real or not, the Adrian method still works! It's not usually an overnight success like this post claims, but it is still very possible to make good monthly earnings...Best of luck!
Legitonuorah
BANNED
- Aug 13, 2018
- 390
- 57
Where do you upload?
LordCameltoe
Power Member
- Mar 2, 2011
- 698
- 466
You guys do realize that Adrian posted that method just to get referrals right? Its not something you're going to make any long term money with.
Whether he did or didn't, I don't know if your sign-up date is real
If videos stick = traffic > cam offer > lifetime revshare. Sounds pretty long term to me. Not that what he shared wasn't already common knowledge, it's just always easier to have the steps written out for you. But in general, the method works. Viewer sees website watermark or text in title/description. Is interested, visits said website. Otherwise all these tube sites wouldn't have a content partner program for all these paysites and watermarks wouldn't exist.
LordCameltoe
Power Member
- Mar 2, 2011
- 698
- 466
Whether he did or didn't, I don't know if your sign-up date is real
But in general, the method works. Viewer sees website watermark or text in title/description. Is interested, visits said website. Otherwise all these tube sites wouldn't have a content partner program for all these paysites and watermarks wouldn't exist.
I don't understand what your jab at my signup date means. But I've been in adult since 2005, have managed multiple adult programs and was one of the people that built Crakrevenue. I talk using facts taken from experience. The porn upload method can work for beer money, but as soon as you try to scale, you'll encounter all the same barriers that stop everyone else. The only workaround is to put a really good twist on things or have one helluva smart automation system.
Also, partner programs are for original content creators, not porn re-uploaders.
Nope you fully misunderstood me, and those that help run programs aren't always that clued into what's possible and what isn't, been doing this myself years too. Specifically, if you re-upload you aren't just going to earn beer money, provided you do it correctly. Not necessarily a new twist but do so in a manner that your videos stick across all tube sites.
Granted, I'm assuming you're directing it at the many who do it wrong, spam accounts, have no forward thinking and generally get accounts banned or don't best use the traffic they do get properly (send them to CPA smartlinks). They don't match up the niche, they don't send to revshare programs or their own, and look for a quick buck.
What I meant is that the porn re-upload method in its essence isn't dead (watermarking, it does drive traffic, does it not?). I also referenced content partners in the sense that they become content partners for the rights to take up real estate on the pages they occupy on tube sites, much like you try as a porn re-uploader as much as possible by watermarking, plugging it in the title and description if possible (plus intro/outro's) to take up some real estate yourself. Meaning, if it didn't work to drive traffic they wouldn't be doing it.
Now, if you mean porn re-uploading the way Adrian specifically explains it is much harder to do and scale nowadays, then sure I agree, but not impossible either.
But, again if we strip it down to its most basic form:
Upload porn > watermark (title/description if possible) > traffic goes to said address > $$$. It works. The issue comes if you get accounts banned and lose videos or don't use the traffic to profit long term from it.
Do you not agree?