UN-BANNABLE LinkedIn Bot?

[CanuckHat]

Is there any bot there that allows me to mass-send automatic connection requests (with personal notes attached) + auto-follow ups, all WITHOUT getting suspended or them finding out I have a bot?

My niche has 40,000 profiles between USA, Canada, Australia, UK. There's 3 of my Co-Founders.

But are there any bots that could speed up the process by doing the above automatically WITHOUT getting us banned?

 

[Wilson Grant Fisk]

No bot is 100% safe, even manually you will be banned if you are too aggressive.

 

[deedee1whoa]

Didn't you already decide in your other threat you're gonna go with the paid web-based service which knows LI's limits and makes sure your account stays safe?

 

[i_code]

If automation is the route you want to go i would suggest a custom bot,Something you have complete control of.

 

[CanuckHat]

Didn't you already decide in your other threat you're gonna go with the paid web-based service which knows LI's limits and makes sure your account stays safe?

Yes, its called LinkMe Tool. But these bots made in 2nd and 3rd world countries where developers don't have empathy for the end-consumer who has "lots of money anyways" like to do White Lies about their product. So I don't know if I can trust them knowing the daily limits or not.

I've had my LI account for FIVE years! I don't want to get banned

Its a risk and I might go with it, just fishing for alternatives.

No bot is 100% safe, even manually you will be banned if you are too aggressive.

https://linkmetool.com/?How-many-Li...e-a-list-of-4-700-people-I-would-like-to-add#

What about that one?

If automation is the route you want to go i would suggest a custom bot,Something you have complete control of.

https://linkmetool.com/?How-many-Li...e-a-list-of-4-700-people-I-would-like-to-add#

What are your thoughts on this one

 

[webtechz]

is that even possible an unbannable bot? linkedin update if needed

 

[CanuckHat]

is that even possible an unbannable bot? linkedin update if needed

Dude, what I mean is something that goes undetected from LinkedIn's bot-detector. As in, it stays within LinkedIn's levels of appropriate activity (eg. if LinkedIn says 200+ messages a day sets off the bot alarm, then the bot does 199 messages a day)

You get me, bro?

 

[appProgrammer]

You need someone to make you a custom bot that acts like a real person. I suggest you look over in the higher a freelancer section. These sorts of tools are easy to create. Just think, would a real person attempt to connect with 40k people in one day? The answer is no. You need to have the bot browse the site, the profiles of the people you want to connect with etc. It needs to have random delays etc. My tools even take breaks when a normal person would be sleeping. It is very easy to spot a fake account if it is connecting with people 24/7..

 

[CanuckHat]

You need someone to make you a custom bot that acts like a real person. I suggest you look over in the higher a freelancer section. These sorts of tools are easy to create. Just think, would a real person attempt to connect with 40k people in one day? The answer is no. You need to have the bot browse the site, the profiles of the people you want to connect with etc. It needs to have random delays etc. My tools even take breaks when a normal person would be sleeping. It is very easy to spot a fake account if it is connecting with people 24/7..

I agree with you.

With that said, I don't want to fork out $500 on a freelancer if there is already a subscription-based SAAS product out there (eg. LinkMe Tool above which I'm looking into).

Good points about making your bot act human. After all, that's the goal right? Having a replacement for an 8 hour a day working human. But even then, you can still get banned. I read that LI says even MANUALLY they don't want you connecting with "a massive amount of profiles each day".

So there's that.

It also depends on what % of Requests accept.

LinkedIn has a BROWSER-EXTENSION MONITOR that detects Chrome Extensions that it has flagged in its system (Eg. Prospect.io, LinkedHelper, etc).

Important for the ideal bot to act human, abide by LinkedIn's bot detector limits, AND not be detected by their Chrome Extension Monitor.

You know any available SAAS tools?

 

[webtechz]

Dude, what I mean is something that goes undetected from LinkedIn's bot-detector. As in, it stays within LinkedIn's levels of appropriate activity (eg. if LinkedIn says 200+ messages a day sets off the bot alarm, then the bot does 199 messages a day)

You get me, bro?

Yep i got you brother!

 

[Bots-Scrapers]

You can use any browser engine or selenium - browser based bots are not easy to detect.

 

[Elon Snup]

With that said, I don't want to fork out $500 on a freelancer if there is already a subscription-based SAAS product out there (eg. LinkMe Tool above which I'm looking into).

Good points about making your bot act human. After all, that's the goal right? Having a replacement for an 8 hour a day working human. But even then, you can still get banned. I read that LI says even MANUALLY they don't want you connecting with "a massive amount of profiles each day".

Important for the ideal bot to act human, abide by LinkedIn's bot detector limits, AND not be detected by their Chrome Extension Monitor.

LinkedIn have terms & rules, just like any other social network. You have to understand that bots are against these rules.

If you're not willing to spend $500 on an "undetectable" bot (which remains cheap imho) - then you can't at the same times have high expectations for a SaaS bot.

The day a $50 bot can get you out of any trouble is not today and not tomorrow. In Internet marketing and mass use market, you can't have it both: cheap and reliable.

My 2 cents: Learn what's the limit, decrease it and configure the bot following those new limits and you'll remain safe.

 

[CanuckHat]

LinkedIn have terms & rules, just like any other social network. You have to understand that bots are against these rules.

If you're not willing to spend $500 on an "undetectable" bot (which remains cheap imho) - then you can't at the same times have high expectations for a SaaS bot.

The day a $50 bot can get you out of any trouble is not today and not tomorrow. In Internet marketing and mass use market, you can't have it both: cheap and reliable.

My 2 cents: Learn what's the limit, decrease it and configure the bot following those new limits and you'll remain safe.

I think you're being biased. Just like Taxi Drivers hate Uber or how Banks hate Bitcoin. These "$50 SAAS Bots" are your "Bitcoin" or your "Uber".

The site explicitly states it is undetected by LinkedIn's limits. Look yourself with an UNBIASED view and let me know please:

https://linkmetool.com/?How-many-Li...e-a-list-of-4-700-people-I-would-like-to-add#

(Bottom of page)

 

[Elon Snup]

I think you're being biased. Just like Taxi Drivers hate Uber or how Banks hate Bitcoin. These "$50 SAAS Bots" are your "Bitcoin" or your "Uber".

The site explicitly states it is undetected by LinkedIn's limits. Look yourself with an UNBIASED view and let me know please:

https://linkmetool.com/?How-many-Li...e-a-list-of-4-700-people-I-would-like-to-add#

(Bottom of page)

It's not a biased view and your metaphore is out of context. We're talking about a $50 bot against a $26.6Bn company. It's a game of cat and mouse. That bot is working today, it won't tomorrow simply because there are people working at LinkedIn, on a payroll, for that kind of situation. Anything that is mass distributed end up being flagged.

A good metaphore would be the RAT. Make your own, use it alone and you can pass 5 years being undetected by malware scanner. Offer it for sale and 2 weeks later it will be flagged in all antivirus.

What Linkme tool is doing is just setting up limit, having an extension that does the work for you. It works today, and it's set at $50. I don't know what exactly you're waiting for.

Sellers, affiliates and user will tell you "it works great, it's perfect use it". Until it doesn't. Linked might lower their limits or just flag the chrome extention. You will not find any soft with guarantee over time. It's just not those tools work.

 

[deedee1whoa]

It's not a biased view and your metaphore is out of context. We're talking about a $50 bot against a $26.6Bn company. It's a game of cat and mouse. That bot is working today, it won't tomorrow simply because there are people working at LinkedIn, on a payroll, for that kind of situation. Anything that is mass distributed end up being flagged.

A good metaphore would be the RAT. Make your own, use it alone and you can pass 5 years being undetected by malware scanner. Offer it for sale and 2 weeks later it will be flagged in all antivirus.

What Linkme tool is doing is just setting up limit, having an extension that does the work for you. It works today, and it's set at $50. I don't know what exactly you're waiting for.

Sellers, affiliates and user will tell you "it works great, it's perfect use it". Until it doesn't. Linked might lower their limits or just flag the chrome extention. You will not find any soft with guarantee over time. It's just not those tools work.

I think your logic is the way to go. Safest as you can be, make it for yourself and that's that.

 

[The Undefined]

For Linked In, I don't know a bot or something like that but if you keep your accept rate above 80% everything would be fine. It's just like Instagram without 24hrs ban and higher bot tolerance.

You can use any browser engine or selenium - browser based bots are not easy to detect.

And for clarification, Selenium based bots are simply detectable because of implementing official automation protocol from W3.
You can hide them, but It's a kind of a headache to do so.

 

[Bots-Scrapers]

For Linked In, I don't know a bot or something like that but if you keep your accept rate above 80% everything would be fine. It's just like Instagram without 24hrs ban and higher bot tolerance.


And for clarification, Selenium based bots are simply detectable because of implementing official automation protocol from W3.
You can hide them, but It's a kind of a headache to do so.

Did you try with OTHER BROWSER ENGINES? Like Geckofx or Phantomjs? They should not cause much issuei think.
( no selenium - just the native library for your language)


Thanks

 

[CanuckHat]

It's not a biased view and your metaphore is out of context. We're talking about a $50 bot against a $26.6Bn company. It's a game of cat and mouse. That bot is working today, it won't tomorrow simply because there are people working at LinkedIn, on a payroll, for that kind of situation. Anything that is mass distributed end up being flagged.

A good metaphore would be the RAT. Make your own, use it alone and you can pass 5 years being undetected by malware scanner. Offer it for sale and 2 weeks later it will be flagged in all antivirus.

What Linkme tool is doing is just setting up limit, having an extension that does the work for you. It works today, and it's set at $50. I don't know what exactly you're waiting for.

Sellers, affiliates and user will tell you "it works great, it's perfect use it". Until it doesn't. Linked might lower their limits or just flag the chrome extention. You will not find any soft with guarantee over time. It's just not those tools work.

God damn it. I wish I could pay LESS for MORE in return.

Fine. You make good points.

Can you make the bot? Do you know anyone that could?

I'll make a bot that works for me and is not mass distributed.

I just don't want to go broke!

PS: You mentioned that LinkMeTool works to be within the limits and it works. So why are you suggesting to me to pay a premium to build my own? I don't get it. Please tell me what you suggest with LinkMe if its undetectable.

For Linked In, I don't know a bot or something like that but if you keep your accept rate above 80% everything would be fine. It's just like Instagram without 24hrs ban and higher bot tolerance.


And for clarification, Selenium based bots are simply detectable because of implementing official automation protocol from W3.
You can hide them, but It's a kind of a headache to do so.

DUDE! An 80% acceptance rate on LinkedIn? Are you nuts? Unless you're Barack Obama, I doubt you can get those numbers.

I connection requested 160 people and only 40 accepted. That's 25%!

 

[Wilson Grant Fisk]

OP rather than have the discussion why not test the bot you mention. Personally I always doubt all claims made by software devs, the only way to know for sure is to test.
That is why you always run several accounts so that you can test which bots work for you before trying them on your main accounts.

 

[CanuckHat]

OP rather than have the discussion why not test the bot you mention. Personally I always doubt all claims made by software devs, the only way to know for sure is to test.
That is why you always run several accounts so that you can test which bots work for you before trying them on your main accounts.

Fine, I'll get one of my co-founders to test the account.

My account has been active for 5 years, so I can't risk banning it.

They only JUST made theirs for the. purpose of this business. So why not get 1 of them to test It for 2 weeks? And then add our other 2 accounts onto it if it works.

Good point Mr. Khan!