Status
Not open for further replies.

kindarthur

Elite Member
Jr. VIP
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
3,760
Reaction score
563
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread Approved

Summary
For the review, @kindarthur provided me with a copy of their business package. The details of my review are below.

Service Highlights
  • To start off, the report I received was well-organised and contained the site URLs, RD, TF, DA, domain age, target keyword, target URL, live links, and date the post was created.
  • I checked the age of the domains in the report, and they were exactly as advertised.
  • *The domain name were registered across six different registrars.
  • The average DA was 20+, just as advertised (most of them were around 20).
  • None of the websites looked the same and they didn't suffer from some of the shared design issues I usually find with these PBNs (e.g., the menu bars all use the same links). In fact, they appeared to have some effort put into them.
  • As for the content that was posted, the articles were decent enough. No issues came up for the articles in Copyscape, the sites all used different articles from what I saw, and I didn't find anything to suggest that the content was spin.
What Could Use Improvement
  • *A little more than half of the domains were registered with one specific registrar.
  • While some of the sites had a social bar, none of them linked to any social media profiles associated with the sites.
Additional Information
  • N/A
For buyers: The quality of the product or service that I receive is what you should expect, or better. If you feel that the quality of the service has dropped significantly, please let us know via the report button.
 
Hi @Zwielicht, thank you so much for approving my thread. I will take a note of improvements which you have mentioned!
Thread Approved

Summary
For the review, @kindarthur provided me with a copy of their business package. The details of my review are below.

Service Highlights
  • To start off, the report I received was well-organised and contained the site URLs, RD, TF, DA, domain age, target keyword, target URL, live links, and date the post was created.
  • I checked the age of the domains in the report, and they were exactly as advertised.
  • *The domain name were registered across six different registrars.
  • The average DA was 20+, just as advertised (most of them were around 20).
  • None of the websites looked the same and they didn't suffer from some of the shared design issues I usually find with these PBNs (e.g., the menu bars all use the same links). In fact, they appeared to have some effort put into them.
  • As for the content that was posted, the articles were decent enough. No issues came up for the articles in Copyscape, the sites all used different articles from what I saw, and I didn't find anything to suggest that the content was spin.
What Could Use Improvement
  • *A little more than half of the domains were registered with one specific registrar.
  • While some of the sites had a social bar, none of them linked to any social media profiles associated with the sites.
Additional Information
  • N/A
For buyers: The quality of the product or service that I receive is what you should expect, or better. If you feel that the quality of the service has dropped significantly, please let us know via the report button.

Don't ask for review copies over here. We have already done the review copies for selected BHWians. They will review the service shortly.

EARLY-BIRD-LOGO-300x209.png


FLAT 52% DISCOUNT TOP PACKAGE and 42% DISCOUNT on OTHER PACKAGES
(ONLY FOR FIRST 5 ORDERS)

FIRST COME! FIRST SERVED!!

COUPON CODE - GRANDPBN

PLACE YOUR ORDER HERE
 
Hi,

I got a free pre-launch review from the seller. My review below:

I was offered two blog posts as a part of this service. Stats for both the sites below:

TF 31 and 20
DA 17 and 47
RD 17 and 1994

Domain age 11 years and 1 year. Unique IP, different blog setup, and a mix of hosts. So, the metrics and RD's came as promised for the most part.

Both articles were handwritten (very readable) with relevant images and placed on high-quality blogs that were relevant to my site. The chosen sites had good authority to them. They looked clean and real. There is no way you could tell that the chosen sites were used for PBN. They looked good with nice themes, were well-designed with relevant pages such as contact, us, about me, etc. So, thumbs up to the site quality.

I hardly get nice articles when I order PBN service. So I can state that the the content delivered on these blog posts were reasonably good for a PBN service. The length of the article was also very satisfactory, and the links are already indexed in Google.

Finally, the report was very nicely organized and the communication throughout was good.

On the whole, I couldn't be happier with what was delivered to my email.

Good luck to the OP!
 
I got a review copy from OP.

I was offered 2 PBN links. Domain metrics were as mentioned below.

TF - 18, 20
DA - 18, 39
RD - 87, 68
Domain Age - 1 Year, 1 Months & 8 Years, 1 Months

So, Domain metrics matches as mentioned in the sales thread.

The report was nicely organized in a pdf file.

Both websites were uniquely designed with a unique logo, themes, Layout. There were also pages like privacy policy, about us, contact us. There were social media buttons but no profile linked with them.

Both Articles were readable and passed copyscape. There were 2-3 images inserted in the article.

Both articles were already indexed in google. I am also seeing some improvements in keyword.

The communication was good and he also offered to revise an article if there was any problem.

Overall, It is a nice service.
 
I recieved a Review copy from OP, this is my Review reply to this thread.

The seller was very friendly and communicative. Everything has worked out fine and the communication was on point. Pluspoint to that!

I recieved 2 PBN links. At first i thought this was just some scraped bullshit text and it would've been just Input my keywords. However OP has actually made a very good article, for a foreign keyword. This article is perfect and awesomely fits my niche. Very surprised with how it turned it to be and you can be definetely sure that i will be purchasing more links from him in the future. Again, thanks op for choosing me to let me Review your package, I highly recommend it!

TF 14 DA 24 RD 86
TF 35 DA 18 RD 39
 
My review

I was fortunate enough to get a review copy for 2 blog posts.

TF 26 DA 20 RD 111 age about 1 year
TF 19 DA 22 RD 55 age about 8 years

The communication with seller was perfect. I got a nice detailed report, but it seems for some reason all metrics were different from what was in the report.

The content was high quality spun, so not too bad but not as good as human writing, but decent for this type of pbn. The content covered exactly my niche so relevancy was there.

The best part for me was the website designs, as some efforts were made for a nice real look, a unique logo, with plenty of images, a nice header, real looking ads, TOS page, etc. It is better looking than most PBN in this price range.

Overall, it is a good service at this price.
 
Last edited:
Re-Review copy time :D

Content quality:

I got 600+ words unique article posted on each blog that passed copyscape just fine. At first, the seller delivered something awful but then fixed it 24 hours later getting a way better and readable article that actually sounded like someone wrote it. No complaints here as the content quality matches the price (some different words could be used here and there but overall okay).

Website:

Ads are "legit" (Asus banner linking to asus website) but one thing that bothered me like with "most" PBN service providers here is ... they used social icons on the site that just link to the root domain (no social profiles). I think the seller will take some of my tips in consideration to fix the PBN. Logos are unique and related to the actual website (some PBN sellers actually had different logos onsite).

Link Stats (its basically what this services is all about) - metric lovers unite.

I got 2 links
with the following metrics:

Link #1
TF = 20
DA = 25
RD = 597

Link #2
TF = 19
DA = 23
RD = 93

Customer Support

He is there on skype to help you out. Nothing else to say here.

I would suggest the seller to put articles in for review to each of their customer before getting them posted just to be sure they are satisfied with it. Can't talk about rank increases but I think it should boost me up a spot or two (competitive niche).
 
:) Superb service I never saw such clean PBN site :)
Yes, this is my review and few of you already saw my reviews on other service providers BST. I am not a kind of person with sweet words :)
But this guy impressed me :)

The websites look clean just like a real blog, the first impression of the website is like it is a real blog or not a PBN site.
Let's move to the content quality; which is good at least compared to other service providers so far...! The content is at least readable & you can understand.
Now let's talk about the metrics; the DA/PA of the 1st website is 25/25 & the second is the 2nd one is 22/19. Now if you want to know about the TF/CF of the 1st website is 12/14 & the 2nd is 20/11.
The age of the 1st domain is 22+ Years and the 2nd one is 8+ years, both domains are hosted on different platforms and with different IP's.

The service looks promising. I personally recommend anyone to try this service. It will surely increase your Authority on Google Searches.

Thanks, @kindarthur for offering me a review copy of your service. I will surely place an order soon.
 
Got 2 live links from Grandiose PBN_Review Copy frame and checked them.First I must say that there was no need of any changes or questions before reviewing the service!
This is a rilliant service, I have never met before (believe me I have tried tons of them)
Thanks and regards to @kindarthur .
 
Just received my report for the 2 links I was offered for a review copy:

  • The report I received was well-organized and contained the site URLs, RD, TF, DA, domain age, target keyword, target URL, live links, and date the post was created.
  • RD: 39,32 TF: 34,27 DA:19,22
  • I have checked the domains and they were exactly as advertised.
  • The 2 websites looked different and they didn't suffer from some of the shared design issues often seen in PBNs, it appears that seller has put some effort into them.
  • As for the content that was posted, the articles were really good. No issues came up for the articles in Copyscape, and content was definitely not pure quality spin.
Overall I'm really impressed with the quality and do believe that there is great value for your money here
 
Review;


I was offered a couple of posts to try out this Grandiose PBN service.

Easy to fill in order form, painless process. Communication was good when needed, so no problems there.

Report was delivered quickly. It's a downloadable PDF. This gives sites details, metrics and also the URL and acnhor used, plus links through to the actual articles and link on the posts.
Sites look fine, different themes, styles and layouts.


First domain which is a .com is DA 39 and TF 20, it's 8 years, 1 months old
Content on this was fine, a couple of images relevent to the topic were used.

The second domain is 22 years, 3 months with DA 24 and a TF of 16 and is a .Org TLD
This was a much better article, I'm guessing done by a different writer. Of the 3 images used, 2 were of the actual product which was a very good point.

Although the BST mentions authoriative outbound links will also be added, I didn't see any in either of these 2 posts.
I also randomly chcecked 1 social media icon, to click through to FB, sadly got this ;
This page isn't available
The link you followed may be broken, or the page may have been removed

I've attached this screenshot from Ahrefs showing an overview of the sites metrics.

Grandiose PBN Review.png
 
I received my report for 2 links as I was offered a review copy. I've highlighted the metrics below that I found.

Domain 1

Moz DA: 25
Moz PA (the page authority of where the link was placed): 16 (reasonable, although I only use DA/PA as a filter when working with a list of sites too big to currently work with)
Majestic TF: 15

Ahrefs metrics:
DR (Domain Rating out of 100): 1.7
UR (Url Rating of where the link was placed, out of 100): 4

This suggests Ahrefs doesn't currently think much of the website, with a Ahrefs rank of over 45 million. If I was looking for a backlink from a site it would raise a flag, but of course Ahrefs isn't necessarily gospel.

Referring Domains: 105. I go for at least 100, so it just about passed this one.
Organic keywords/traffic: Very low, so going off Ahrefs, it doesn't bring in much natural traffic from Google (which I guess doesn't matter if you're just looking for links for ranking purposes).


Domain 2

Moz DA: 22
Moz PA (the page authority of where the link was placed): 17 (reasonable)
Majestic TF: 20

Ahrefs metrics:

DR (Domain Rating out of 100): 4.6
UR (Url Rating of where the link was placed, out of 100): 5

Like the Domain above, Ahrefs doesn't currently think much of the website. Ahrefs rank is 29.2 million.

Referring Domains: Ahrefs came back with 'no data', so it hasn't yet spidered enough links to give that information.
Organic keywords/traffic: 0, but as above, it doesn't appear as though Ahrefs has got data, or enough data to come back with anything.


Ranking Changes:
The articles were published online just over a week ago, so I've had a look at the ranking changes. Since last week, there's currently been no major changes. For the actual keyword phrase that was used as the link it's moved up from 13th to 12th for google.com and moved down from 15 to 16 for google.co.uk, so I can't read much into that just yet.

I checked the content of the articles, and I'd class it as reasonable. You can tell it wasn't written by somebody where English is their first language. It may be something to consider for a site that is not your main site.
 
Review Time!

I was lucky enough to get a couple of posts to try out this Grandiose PBN service.

Communication with OP was just great. Fast delivery, report was uploaded in PDF format.

I have checked the domains and they were exactly as advertised.
Each domain was a .com. First of 13 years old, second of 19 years old!

As for the content that was posted, the articles were really impressive! No plagiarism was found. A couple of images relevant to the topic were used. English language was just perfect. And it is definitely not spun content.
It's necessary to emphasize that I provided extremely specific key-word, anyway both the articles were absolutely relevant with high quality images.

Overall I'm highly impressed with the quality and speed. Price seems reasonable.
Thanks and regards to kindarthur. I wish you good sales!
 
I got a review copy from OP.

1) The age of the domain checks out.
  • One domain is 19 years
  • One domain is 12 years. Favicon was missing for this domain.
2) Content was nicely written.
  • 3As my content was in the business niche, it requires a certain level of formal english. I think the content that was written suits the niche that I am in.
  • Length of the content was appropriate.
  • Unique content definitely
  • But the same image was used across 2 domains. Could have used unique images.
3) Power of the domain.
  • Both have a decent number of RD
  • Unfortunately, there's no organic traffic for either of the domains.
Overall, I think it's a great for value service considering it's price.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top