Don't say again web 2.0 not indexing

[Array Experts]

I saw many guys complaining web 2.0 not indexing..
Have a look this pls

​

I just built tier links only.
No indexing or pinging service used for indexing

 

[lifehero]

ive never had a problem with weeblys indexing. its tumblr, wordpress, and few others that don't index for me

 

[proxified]

I guess most people were havibg trouble indexing their own sites, not sure if someone had trouble with web 2.0

 

[hadron]

when you build gsa links to web 2 they index pretty fast and fine. no big invention over there.

 

[Univa]

ive never had a problem with weeblys indexing. its tumblr, wordpress, and few others that don't index for me

Wordpress naah they index pretty fast.
Its those Tumblrs that take time to index and even after they are index they get deindex too sometimes.

 

[Array Experts]

ive never had a problem with weeblys indexing. its tumblr, wordpress, and few others that don't index for me

Wordpress, tumblr, page.tl, zohosites also index pretty fast
bravesites, jigsy little slow but they also index 2-3 days after building tiers links

I guess most people were havibg trouble indexing their own sites, not sure if someone had trouble with web 2.0

when you build gsa links to web 2 they index pretty fast and fine. no big invention over there.

i know not big invention i saw threads on forum about web 2.0 not indexing that's why posted this

 

[DEFINE]

Is web 2.0 one platform? Claiming that they are indexing within 12 hours based on one platform is pretty stupid. Some index faster, some index longer and some never index. Not all of us are in the same niches as well. I had some makeup niches that never indexed and yet some other niches regarding fashion did index.

 

[Array Experts]

Is web 2.0 one platform? Claiming that they are indexing within 12 hours based on one platform is pretty stupid. Some index faster, some index longer and some never index. Not all of us are in the same niches as well. I had some makeup niches that never indexed and yet some other niches regarding fashion did index.

Oh come on man google don't have any niche wise restriction

Have a look these web 2.0 built on 17th May

​

 

[adsassist]

Never had a problem indexing web2.0's. They get index quicker if you content is good.

 

[terrycody]

I build a new site, and contents are average to good, but 1 week already, no index lol, wtf with Google.

 

[sathish2493]

very few of the web 2.0's are indexed.

 

[710fla]

Yeah just build tier 2 and they will index. They're high authority sites

 

[MisterF]

Yeah just build tier 2 and they will index. They're high authority sites

Found I get better results by using some Tier 2 too, the Web 2.0s seem to index quicker.

 

[Poker Rakeback Mafia]

Out of interest, are you guys just using any old GSA spam?
Sure, it gets them indexed quickly, but in the long run, does it ever get them penalised?

 

[JamaicanMoose]

Handwritten blog comments on blog posts that have decent traffic will get most links indexed quickly.

 

[jamie3000]

Out of interest, are you guys just using any old GSA spam?
Sure, it gets them indexed quickly, but in the long run, does it ever get them penalised?

I'm also interested in what's being built to them

 

[antihero11]

Out of interest, are you guys just using any old GSA spam?
Sure, it gets them indexed quickly, but in the long run, does it ever get them penalised?

Wordpress or Tumblr cant be penalized with GSA or something like that. They are too big

 

[Cryptokid]

Building tier 2 links does index the web2.0s quickly. However I find the indexing rate very slow. I would prefer a good indexer any day.

 

[Array Experts]

I build a new site, and contents are average to good, but 1 week already, no index lol, wtf with Google.

Build few high authority link & social signals helps to quick index

very few of the web 2.0's are indexed.

very few web 2.0's aren't index

Out of interest, are you guys just using any old GSA spam?
Sure, it gets them indexed quickly, but in the long run, does it ever get them penalised?

Do you imagine google can ever panalyze any wikipedia page due to link spam?
Google can't panalyze web 2.0's because of high authority.

 

[Poker Rakeback Mafia]

Do you imagine google can ever panalyze any wikipedia page due to link spam?
Google can't panalyze web 2.0's because of high authority.

In my previous experience and observation, Google doesn't quite work like that.

I have seen subdomains of normal websites penalised or de-indexed, while other subdomains of the same website were ranking just fine.

I remember a guy who used subdomains to churn and burn, and after a month or two when the subdomain, for example, 1.website, got de-indexed, he would move the whole website to 2.website, and 301 re-direct the links, and the new website would rank almost immediately.
Then 2 months later when 2.website got de-indexed, he would move the whole thing to 3.website and it would rank again, etc.

So it seems to me that Google treats different subdomains as different websites, and could, in fact, penalise cars.wordpress, while not penalising bikes.wordpress.

So what I'm asking is, do you guys actually point 500,000 spam GSA links at your web 2.0's, and does it increase their power, and do they ever get penalised?