Why are websites 2.0 not indexing?

[Deleted member 657006]

Google dont like these web 2.0s anymore.

how can you say that what facebook and others ?

heigh web 2.0 are used for indexing heigh , why say google dont like them clealy not true

web 2.0 are only thing left for backlinking really so dont no why you say that .

 

[Bigblast]

Are they not indexing or just not ranking? People often say their pages are not indexing, but what they really mean is that they are not ranking.

How are you checking if they are indexed?

 

[bartosimpsonio]

I suspect that some popular web 2.0's leave do-follow links as bait but they cloak a restrictive robots.txt and/or other noindex directives that you don't see (IP/agent cloaking).

 

[Rachmaninoff]

Are you finding that 1-page sites still index?

Yes all the time.

 

[Scorpion Ghost]

I read half of this thread and glanced through the rest. Why didn't anyone mention webmaster tools?

Submit your web 2.0 site to google webmaster tools. Sitemap too. Also find online ping sites, ping your website homepage as well as any post you publish. And share your website on Twitter/Google+/Facebook etc.

Should get you indexed.

Why didn't anyone mention google webmaster tools? Am i missing something?

 

[Lightproxies]

Other than those that have been discussed above, you can always build backlinks to your web2.0 and that is the better way to getting those indexed for the long run.
Using an instant link indexing service can get your links indexed within 8-24 hours if they are good, but they may fall out within 2-4 weeks time from the index.
Using a link indexing software can also get the link indexed, but just like the instant link indexing service, it can fall out anytime from the index.
Building good links to those web2.0 will ensure that they get indexed for the long run.

 

[RankUp]

Just need to be patient. Build safe tier two. Make everything look natural, even set a few Twitter accounts up for them.

I like using social media and making it look natural as this is what a "real" site would do. Think about a new business that just opened up, how would they promote it? Copy that line of thinking for initial set up

 

[bArAsc]

I suspect that some popular web 2.0's leave do-follow links as bait but they cloak a restrictive robots.txt and/or other noindex directives that you don't see (IP/agent cloaking).

Can you share some samples of this type web 2.0 @bartosimpsonio ?

 

[Aira Wedding]

Have you built tier 2 links to your properties?

 

[Scritty]

Google now deliberately delay indexing free WEB2.0 sites.
It's not an accident. It isn't lack of indexing resources. It is deliberate.

WEB2.0 was getting a bad name and Google told Tumblr (of all the terrible toxic sites) that it was simply going to stop indexing it becasue it was full of spam. The whole site.
Tumblr and other big WEB2.0 sites said "Give us a chance to fix it" so Google's response was "Ok, we will delay indexing on any new subdomains for "x" time to give you the chance to filter out and delete the spam"

Tim O Reilly has posted some detail about this. Google "WEB 2.0 delay indexing Tim O'Reilly" for tyhe details

 

[Poker Rakeback Mafia]

I read half of this thread and glanced through the rest. Why didn't anyone mention webmaster tools?

Submit your web 2.0 site to google webmaster tools. Sitemap too. Also find online ping sites, ping your website homepage as well as any post you publish. And share your website on Twitter/Google+/Facebook etc.

Should get you indexed.

Why didn't anyone mention google webmaster tools? Am i missing something?

Because if you are using the web 2.0's to link to your money site, then you are trying to make Google think that the 2.0's belong to somebody else who is linking to your site. The last thing that you want to do is tell Google that you own them.

Or am I missing something?

 

[Scorpion Ghost]

Because if you are using the web 2.0's to link to your money site, then you are trying to make Google think that the 2.0's belong to somebody else who is linking to your site. The last thing that you want to do is tell Google that you own them.

Or am I missing something?

You have or you create a new Gmail/Google account, therefore new Webmaster tools that's in no way linked to your original Google account, and you submit your site there.

Or am I missing something?

 

[Poker Rakeback Mafia]

Yeah, you could do that. And obviously, use a VPN for the IP's. It just becomes more work and another complication for a single backlink.
Any web 2.0 will need a tier 2 of links, and they will get it indexed just fine. I don't see any need to complicate things any further.

 

[Scorpion Ghost]

Right. Use a proxy, a VPN, the neighbor's internet, starfucks, you figure it out.

Yeah you're probably right. But the OP asked about getting indexed, and I told him the first thing I'd do. Also submit on Bing/Yahoo and Yandex webmasters, just for good measure

 

[Poker Rakeback Mafia]

Yes all the time.

With good content, or spun garbage?

 

[Rachmaninoff]

With good content, or spun garbage?

Both. It doesn’t matter the quality of the content. It’s all about your tier 2 and indexing.

 

[Bigblast]

After last update google have problems with indexing

Ping tools - dontt work Google webmaster (sitemap, view as googlebot) - dontt work Add to google (in search page)- dontt work Mobile friendly & AMP tester- dontt work Just one things work right now it`s (video sitemap submission) you can use 301 redirect from website with video sitemap for indexing. From one domain you can index up to 5 url

 

[bartosimpsonio]

Can you share some samples of this type web 2.0 @bartosimpsonio ?

I don't have proof because I can't test them as googlebot. So no...

 

[elias880810]

The length of the content has nothing to do with indexing. Have you built tier 2 links to your properties yet?

not yet created any Tier 2, before it was not necessary to do it, now it seems that it is mandatory.

 

[elias880810]

Are they not indexing or just not ranking? People often say their pages are not indexing, but what they really mean is that they are not ranking.

How are you checking if they are indexed?

They are not indexed, I know what you mean. simple I use the footprint site: url